International consensus criteria for the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Vasoconstriction accompanied by changes in skin color is a normal physiologic response to cold. The distinction between this normal physiology and Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has yet to be well characterized. In anticipation of the 9th International Congress on Autoimmunity, a panel of 12 RP experts from 9 different institutes and four different countries were assembled for a Delphi exercise to establish new diagnostic criteria for RP. Relevant investigators with highly cited manuscripts in Raynaud's-related research were identified using the Web of Science and invited to participate. Surveys at each stage were administered to participants via the on-line SurveyMonkey software tool. The participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of statements using a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) through 9 (extremely appropriate). In the second stage, panel participants were asked to rank rewritten items from the first round that were scored as "uncertain" for the diagnosis of RP, items with significant disagreement (Disagreement Index > 1), and new items suggested by the panel. Results were analyzed using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry (IPRAS) method. A 3-Step Approach to diagnose RP was then developed using items the panelists "agreed" were "appropriate" diagnostic criteria. In the final stage, the panel was presented with the newly developed diagnostic criteria and asked to rate them against previous models. Following the first two iterations of the Delphi exercise, the panel of 12 experts agreed that 36 of the items were "appropriate", 12 items had "uncertain" appropriateness, and 13 items were "inappropriate" to use in the diagnostic criteria of RP. Using an expert committee, we developed a 3-Step Approach for the diagnosis of RP and 5 additional criteria for the diagnosis of primary RP. The committee came to an agreement that the proposed criteria were "appropriate and accurate" for use by physicians to diagnose patients with RP.

[1]  A. Silman,et al.  A two-stage, genome-wide screen for susceptibility loci in primary Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  M. Gutierrez,et al.  Nailfold capillary patterns in healthy subjects: a real issue in capillaroscopy. , 2013, Microvascular research.

[3]  J. Block,et al.  Raynaud's phenomenon , 2001, The Lancet.

[4]  V. Fialka-Moser,et al.  Thermographic parameters in the diagnosis of secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  T. Medsger,et al.  Raynaud's phenomenon: a proposal for classification. , 1992, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[6]  S. L. Nielsen Raynaud phenomena and finger systolic pressure during cooling. , 1978, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[7]  Tim D Spector,et al.  Use of thermographic criteria to identify Raynaud's phenomenon in a population setting. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[8]  W. Kannel,et al.  The Occurrence of Raynaud's Phenomenon in a General Population: The Framingham Study , 1997, Vascular medicine.

[9]  Maricq Hr,et al.  Diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon assisted by color charts. , 1988 .

[10]  J. Belch,et al.  Raynaud's phenomenon: its relevance to scleroderma. , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .

[13]  A. Blann,et al.  Von Willebrand factor, thrombomodulin, thromboxane, beta-thromboglobulin and markers of fibrinolysis in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  T. Moore,et al.  The 'distal-dorsal difference': a thermographic parameter by which to differentiate between primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2007, Rheumatology.

[15]  Tonia Moore,et al.  Computerized nailfold video capillaroscopy--a new tool for assessment of Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  H. Rintamäki,et al.  Finger blood pressure and rewarming rate for screening and diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon in workers exposed to vibration. , 1991, British journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  N. Lassen,et al.  Measurement of digital blood pressure after local cooling. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[18]  M. Bartelink,et al.  A standardized finger cooling test for Raynaud's phenomenon: diagnostic value and sex differences. , 1993, European heart journal.

[19]  A. Herrick Pathogenesis of Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2005, Rheumatology.

[20]  M. Mcilroy,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Peripheral Arterial Obstruction in Raynaud's Phenomenon: Development of a Predictive Model of Obstructive Arterial Cross-Sectional Area and Validation with a Doppler Blood Flow Study , 2000, Angiology.

[21]  M. Weinrich,et al.  Diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon assisted by color charts. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  A. Silman,et al.  VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THREE METHODS USED IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RAYNAUD'S PHENOMENON , 1993 .

[23]  J. Jennings,et al.  Evaluation of treatment efficacy of Raynaud phenomenon by digital blood pressure response to cooling , 2000, Vascular medicine.

[24]  U. Müller-Ladner,et al.  The role of capillaroscopy in differentiation of primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon in rheumatic diseases: a review of the literature and two case reports , 2009, Rheumatology International.

[25]  A. Smit,et al.  Serial nailfold capillary microscopy in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and scleroderma. , 1994, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  N. Harris,et al.  Influence of the cold challenge on the discriminatory capacity of the digital distal-dorsal difference in the thermographic assessment of Raynaud's phenomenon. , 2011, Microvascular research.

[27]  J. Belch,et al.  Raynaud’s Phenomenon: State of the Art 1998 , 1998 .

[28]  Leroy Ec,et al.  Raynaud's phenomenon: a proposal for classification. , 1992 .

[29]  F. Ingegnoli,et al.  [Raynaud's phenomenon]. , 2011, Reumatismo.

[30]  A. Moorthy,et al.  Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  J. Cooke,et al.  Mechanisms of Raynaud’s disease , 2005, Vascular medicine.

[32]  A. Silman,et al.  Validity and reliability of three methods used in the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon. The UK Scleroderma Study Group. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[33]  R. Wise,et al.  Digital Pressure-Flow Relationships in Subjects with Raynaud's Phenomenon , 1985, Angiology.

[34]  F. Wigley Clinical practice. Raynaud's Phenomenon. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  N. Olsen Diagnostic tests in Raynaud's phenomena in workers exposed to vibration: a comparative study. , 1988, British journal of industrial medicine.