The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000.

BACKGROUND The increased use of medical therapies has led to increased medical costs. To provide insight into the value of this increased spending, we compared gains in life expectancy with the increased costs of care from 1960 through 2000. METHODS We estimated life expectancy in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 for four age groups. To control for the influence of nonmedical factors on survival, we assumed in our base-case analysis that 50 percent of the gains were due to medical care. We compared the adjusted increases in life expectancy with the lifetime cost of medical care in the same years. RESULTS From 1960 through 2000, the life expectancy for newborns increased by 6.97 years, lifetime medical spending adjusted for inflation increased by approximately 69,000 dollars, and the cost per year of life gained was 19,900 dollars. The cost increased from 7,400 dollars per year of life gained in the 1970s to 36,300 dollars in the 1990s. The average cost per year of life gained in 1960-2000 was approximately 31,600 dollars at 15 years of age, 53,700 dollars at 45 years of age, and 84,700 dollars at 65 years of age. At 65 years of age, costs rose more rapidly than did life expectancy: the cost per year of life gained was 121,000 dollars between 1980 and 1990 and 145,000 dollars between 1990 and 2000. CONCLUSIONS On average, the increases in medical spending since 1960 have provided reasonable value. However, the spending increases in medical care for the elderly since 1980 are associated with a high cost per year of life gained. The national focus on the rise in medical spending should be balanced by attention to the health benefits of this increased spending.

[1]  L. Goldman,et al.  The recent decline in mortality from coronary heart disease, 1980-1990. The effect of secular trends in risk factors and treatment. , 1997, JAMA.

[2]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  M C McCormick,et al.  Declining Severity Adjusted Mortality: Evidence of Improving Neonatal Intensive Care , 1998, Pediatrics.

[4]  Ellen Meara,et al.  Trends in medical spending by age, 1963-2000. , 2004, Health affairs.

[5]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  The Health of Nations: The Contribution of Improved Health to Living Standards , 2002 .

[6]  S. Baker,et al.  Secular trends of motor vehicle mortality in the United States, 1910-1994. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  R. Hardy,et al.  The effect of a reduction in leading causes of death: potential gains in life expectancy. , 1978, American journal of public health.

[8]  R. Williams,et al.  Identifying the sources of the recent decline in perinatal mortality rates in California. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  Are the benefits of newer drugs worth their cost? Evidence from the 1996 MEPS. , 2001, Health affairs.

[10]  Anthony J Culyer,et al.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Cutler,et al.  The Technology of Birth: Is It Worth It? , 1999 .

[12]  J. McMurray,et al.  Contribution of modern cardiovascular treatment and risk factor changes to the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in Scotland between 1975 and 1994 , 1999, Heart.

[13]  R. Kliegman,et al.  Neonatal technology, perinatal survival, social consequences, and the perinatal paradox. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[14]  E. Cook,et al.  The decline in ischemic heart disease mortality rates. An analysis of the comparative effects of medical interventions and changes in lifestyle. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  The Technology of Birth: Is it Worth it? , 1999 .

[16]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  The Economic Value of Medical Research , 2000 .

[17]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? , 1992, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[18]  G. Giovino,et al.  Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors--United States, 1900-1994. , 1994, MMWR. CDC surveillance summaries : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. CDC surveillance summaries.

[19]  U. Reinhardt,et al.  Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[20]  David M. Cutler,et al.  Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America's Health Care System , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1: Seeking an Explanation , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  J P Bunker,et al.  Improving health: measuring effects of medical care. , 1994, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  Marina Manca,et al.  The decline of , 2000 .

[24]  J. Bunker Medicine Matters after All , 1995, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[25]  Bunker Jp Medicine matters after all. , 1995 .

[26]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World , 2003 .

[27]  J P Bunker,et al.  The role of medical care in contributing to health improvements within societies. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  Robert F Schoeni,et al.  Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[29]  J. Critchley,et al.  Modelling the decline in coronary heart disease deaths in England and Wales, 1981-2000: comparing contributions from primary prevention and secondary prevention , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  N. Paneth,et al.  Neonatal mortality: an analysis of the recent improvement in the United States. , 1980, American journal of public health.