Cooperating yet distinct brain networks engaged during naturalistic paradigms: A meta-analysis of functional MRI results

Cognitive processes do not occur by pure insertion and instead depend on the full complement of co-occurring mental processes, including perceptual and motor functions. As such, there is limited ecological validity to human neuroimaging experiments that use highly controlled tasks to isolate mental processes of interest. However, a growing literature shows how dynamic, interactive tasks have allowed researchers to study cognition as it more naturally occurs. Collective analysis across such neuroimaging experiments may answer broader questions regarding how naturalistic cognition is biologically distributed throughout the brain. We applied an unbiased, data-driven, meta-analytic approach that uses k-means clustering to identify core brain networks engaged across the naturalistic functional neuroimaging literature. Functional decoding allowed us to, then, delineate how information is distributed between these networks throughout the execution of dynamical cognition in realistic settings. This analysis revealed seven recurrent patterns of brain activation, representing sensory, domain-specific, and attentional neural networks that support the cognitive demands of naturalistic paradigms. Though gaps in the literature remain, these results suggest that naturalistic fMRI paradigms recruit a common set of networks that that allow both separate processing of different streams of information and integration of relevant information to enable flexible cognition and complex behavior.

[1]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Subspecialization in the human posterior medial cortex , 2015, NeuroImage.

[2]  Tapani Ristaniemi,et al.  Key issues in decomposing fMRI during naturalistic and continuous music experience with independent component analysis , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Angela M. Uecker,et al.  ALE meta‐analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[5]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Cooperating yet distinct brain networks engaged during naturalistic paradigms: A meta-analysis of functional MRI results , 2018, Network Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Clark,et al.  The medial temporal lobe. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Studying the freely-behaving brain with fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Aina Puce,et al.  Viewing the motion of human body parts activates different regions of premotor, temporal, and parietal cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Intrinsic Architecture Underlying the Relations among the Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks of the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Numminen,et al.  Dynamics of brain activity underlying working memory for music in a naturalistic condition , 2014, Cortex.

[11]  Kathrin Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Task-dependent Activation of Face-sensitive Cortex: An fMRI Adaptation Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Angela R Laird,et al.  Brainmap taxonomy of experimental design: Description and evaluation , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  D. Johnson Gray's Anatomy, 37th edition , 1990 .

[14]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[16]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Spatial orienting in complex audiovisual environments , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[17]  M. Bozkurt,et al.  Functional anatomy. , 1980, Equine veterinary journal.

[18]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  The Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: Design and Application , 2011, Neuroinformatics.

[19]  Joshua H. Balsters,et al.  The role of the midcingulate cortex in monitoring others' decisions , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[20]  Allen R. Braun,et al.  Neural correlates and network connectivity underlying narrative production and comprehension: A combined fMRI and PET study , 2014, Cortex.

[21]  Oliver Speck,et al.  A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie , 2014, Scientific Data.

[22]  Kristen A. Lindquist,et al.  The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Ajay B. Satpute,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Neural architecture underlying classification of face perception paradigms , 2015, NeuroImage.

[25]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Sebastian Puschmann,et al.  Mapping the spatiotemporal dynamics of processing task‐relevant and task‐irrelevant sound feature changes using concurrent EEG‐fMRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Christopher J. Honey,et al.  Future trends in Neuroimaging: Neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction , 1996, NeuroImage.

[29]  A D Friederici,et al.  Phonological processing during language production: fMRI evidence for a shared production-comprehension network. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Eye Movements during Auditory Attention Predict Individual Differences in Dorsal Attention Network Activity , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  U. Sailer,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of eye-hand coordination across different tasks , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  The language network , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  Russell A. Epstein Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  G. Roth,et al.  Neural correlates of the empathic perceptual processing of realistic social interaction scenarios displayed from a first-order perspective , 2014, Brain Research.

[36]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Human Hippocampus and Spatial and Episodic Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[37]  O. Sporns,et al.  From regions to connections and networks: new bridges between brain and behavior , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Moors Pieter,et al.  Test-retest reliability. , 2014 .

[40]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Spontaneous mentalizing during an interactive real world task: An fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Joëlle Martineau,et al.  Impaired cortical activation in autistic children: is the mirror neuron system involved? , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[43]  M. Giard,et al.  Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Anjali Krishnan,et al.  Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: Pitfalls and recommendations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[45]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Minimizing within‐experiment and within‐group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta‐analyses , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[46]  Peter Vuust,et al.  Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[49]  Michael Hanke,et al.  A studyforrest extension, simultaneous fMRI and eye gaze recordings during prolonged natural stimulation , 2016, Scientific Data.

[50]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Specialization in the medial temporal lobe for processing of objects and scenes , 2005, Hippocampus.

[51]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  Crossmodal integration enhances neural representation of task-relevant features in audiovisual face perception. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Combining Functional and Anatomical Connectivity Reveals Brain Networks for Auditory Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[53]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Neural foundations of emerging route knowledge in complex spatial environments. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[55]  C. Spence Crossmodal spatial attention , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  K. Zilles,et al.  Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[58]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[59]  Xintao Hu,et al.  Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms , 2016, bioRxiv.

[60]  Jun Liu,et al.  A virtual reality-based FMRI study of reward-based spatial learning , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  NeuroVault.org: A web-based repository for collecting and sharing unthresholded statistical maps of the human brain , 2014, bioRxiv.

[62]  N. Burgess,et al.  The hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  M. Beauregard,et al.  Neural Correlates of Conscious Self-Regulation of Emotion , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[65]  P. Fox,et al.  Functional Segregation of the Human Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  Donna M. Mertens FROM THE COGNITIVE PARADiGM , 2007 .

[67]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Naturalistic fMRI Mapping Reveals Superior Temporal Sulcus as the Hub for the Distributed Brain Network for Social Perception , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  Janne Kauttonen,et al.  Optimizing methods for linking cinematic features to fMRI data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[69]  David M. Mount,et al.  A local search approximation algorithm for k-means clustering , 2002, SCG '02.

[70]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[72]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[73]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[74]  M. Yașargil,et al.  Topographic anatomy of the insular region. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[75]  Michael A. Casey,et al.  High-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI data on the perception of musical , 2016 .

[76]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Neurocognitive Systems Related to Real-World Prospective Memory , 2010, PloS one.

[77]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[78]  Anjali Raja Beharelle,et al.  Frontal and temporal contributions to understanding the iconic co‐speech gestures that accompany speech , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[79]  E. Maguire,et al.  A Temporoparietal and Prefrontal Network for Retrieving the Spatial Context of Lifelike Events , 2001, NeuroImage.

[80]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[81]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: Validation of the Lancaster transform , 2010, NeuroImage.

[82]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[83]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  A Multisensory Cortical Network for Understanding Speech in Noise , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.