Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area.

In the mid-eighties, computerised tomography (CT) assisted three-dimensional imaging, and modelling of skull structures was introduced into preoperative diagnosis in maxillofacial surgery. This new method is already being used in the preoperative planning of corrections of post-traumatic defects and craniofacial deformities as well as in tumour surgery and implantology. The aim of the present study was to collect information on the reproducibility of a skull model milled from hardened polyurethane foam, and based on the CT data of a real skull. Thirty one measurements were carried out on the model and on the original skull, leading to the result that the model showed a mean inaccuracy of 1.5 mm. The deviations ranged between 0.0 and 3.6 mm. Generally, the model structures, however, tended to be larger than those of the original. As far as the total of all measurements is concerned, the model deviated from the original skull by 1.6%. A convincing aspect of the model, which cannot be obtained by any other method, is its plasticity and the possibility of 3-D orientation on a lifesize model. However, the study indicates that surgeons using this technique should consider the possible discrepancies between the model and the real skull when making preoperative assessments.

[1]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. , 1984, Radiology.

[2]  Golec Ts,et al.  CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants. , 1986 .

[3]  E V Staab,et al.  A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  P. Young,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography for maxillofacial surgery: report of cases. , 1988, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Computer‐Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT‐Based Models , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  G. Witte,et al.  Die dreidimensionale Darstellung computertomographischer Untersuchungen kraniofazialer Anomalien , 1986 .

[7]  Three-dimensional CT reformations in the assessment of congenital and traumatic cranio-facial deformities. , 1987, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  Ehud Artzy,et al.  Display of three-dimensional information in computed tomography , 1979 .

[9]  M W Vannier,et al.  The anatomy of the cranio-orbital deformities of craniosynostosis: insights from 3-D images of CT scans. , 1987, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[10]  G T Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial trauma. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the normal temporomandibular joint. , 1986, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  H K Liu,et al.  Display of Three‐Dimensional Information in Computed Tomography , 1977, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  R. Gagne,et al.  Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. , 1987, Radiology.

[14]  G. Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional display of human organs from computed tomograms , 1979 .