Using the hydrologic model mike she to assess disturbance impacts on watershed process and responses across the Southeastern U.S.

­­ A clear understanding of the basic hydrologic processes is needed to restore and manage watersheds across the diverse physiologic gradients in the Southeastern U.S. We evaluated a physically based, spatially distributed watershed hydrologic model called MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 to evaluate disturbance impacts on water use and yield across the region. Long­term forest hydrologic data from a southern Appalachian Mountain and a lower coastal plain watershed in South Carolina were used as model inputs. The model captured the temporal and spatial dynamics of shallow groundwater table movement and streamflow. Results suggest climate change and tree removal would have pronounced hydrologic effects; especially during dry periods. We also found that the data parameterization for even small scale distributed watershed­scale modeling remains challenging where spatial subsurface characteristics are often not known. The global change implications on hydrologic processes and response to in the two landscapes are discussed. INTRODUCTION Over half the land mass of the Southeastern U.S. is forested. The region has high biodiversity, and favorable climate for plant and animal growth, and human habitation. However, forest ecosystem services are threatened by global changes that include population growth, urban sprawl, climate change, and other natural and human stressors (Wear and Greis, 2004). These current and future biotic and abiotic changes will have long­term impacts on watershed ecosystems through their direct effects on the water cycle within the region (McNulty and others 1998). Although forested watersheds provide the best water, potential water quantity and water quality degradation from intensive forest management practices, landuse changes, wildfires and other disturbances is of regional concern (Swank and others 2001). Watershed management and restoration practices, such as Best Management Practices (BMPs) require an accurate understanding of the basic controlling factors of hydrologic processes at a watershed­scale across the diverse physiologic gradients in the Southeastern U.S. (Sun and others 2004)

[1]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate [review article] , 2004 .

[2]  G. Sun,et al.  Regional annual water yield from forest lands and its response to potential deforestation across the southeastern United States , 2005 .

[3]  J. B. Mankin,et al.  Simulation of evapotranspiration and drainage from mature and clear‐cut deciduous forests and young pine plantation , 1975 .

[4]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[5]  G. Sun,et al.  A comparison of the watershed hydrology of coastal forested wetlands and the mountainous uplands in the Southern US , 2002 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Atmospheric deposition and forest nutrient cycling. A synthesis of the Integrated Forest Study. , 1992 .

[7]  G. Sun,et al.  Fifty years of forest hydrology in the Southeast , 2004 .

[8]  G. Sun,et al.  Water budgets of two forested watersheds in South Carolina , 2000 .

[9]  S. Durrans,et al.  A REVISED VERSION OF PnET‐II TO SIMULATE THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE IN SOUTHEASTERN FORESTED AREAS 1 , 2002 .

[10]  Ge Sun,et al.  MODELING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM FORESTED WATERSHEDS ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES 1 , 2003 .

[11]  H. Riekerk Influence of silvicultural practices on the hydrology of pine flatwoods in Florida , 1989 .

[12]  Ge Sun,et al.  A COMPARISON OF SIX POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS FOR REGIONAL USE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES 1 , 2005 .

[13]  T. Burt Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta edited by W. T. Swank and D. A. Crossley, Springer‐Verlag, Ecological studies volume 66, 1987, no. of pages: 469 , 1989 .

[14]  G. Sun,et al.  Five hydrologic studies conducted by or in cooperation with the Center for Forested Wetlands Research , 2005 .

[15]  Ge Sun,et al.  Effects of timber management on the hydrology of wetland forests in the southern United States , 2001 .

[16]  K. Kristensen,et al.  A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1975 .

[17]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[18]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[19]  Jianbiao Lu Modeling Hydrologic Responses to Forest Management and Climate Change in Contrasting Watersheds in the Southeastern United States , 2006 .

[20]  G. Sun,et al.  Influences of management of Southern forests on water quantity and quality , 2004 .

[21]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling of a Drained Pine Plantation on Poorly Drained Soils , 2001 .

[22]  Steven G. McNulty,et al.  Loblolly pine hydrology and productivity across the southern United States , 1996 .

[23]  James M. Vose,et al.  Long-term hydrologic and water quality responses following commercial clearcutting of mixed hardwoods on a southern Appalachian catchment , 2001 .

[24]  W. Swank,et al.  Streamflow Greatly Reduced by Converting Deciduous Hardwood Stands to Pine , 1974, Science.

[25]  G. Sun,et al.  Potential water yield reduction due to forestation across China , 2006 .

[26]  Michael Butts,et al.  CHAPTER 10 FLEXIBLE INTEGRATED WATERSHED MODELING WITH , 2005 .