Comparing trained and untrained teachers on their use of LMS tools using the Rasch analysis

Abstract Measuring training outcomes is important given the resources universities invest in staff learning management system (LMS) training. In this paper we show how the effect of LMS training on LMS usage can be evaluated using Rasch analysis of teachers' LMS usage activity logs by making comparisons between teachers who have attended training and those who have not. Our analysis showed that teachers who attended LMS training workshops had higher LMS activity level compared with the untrained teachers. In particular, trained teachers tended to make relatively more use of ‘grade centre’ and of ‘assessment tool’ but relatively less use of ‘content’ in their teaching compared with teachers who did not attend training. The results support Rasch analysis as a useful approach for evaluating the effect of training across a large number of courses and extend understanding from findings from self-report studies of training effectiveness. They also provide insights that inform training practice and highlight its importance for development of online teaching. Implications for professional development of online teaching and the evaluation are discussed.

[1]  The Course Experience Questionnaire as an Institutional Performance Indicator , 2000 .

[2]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Florence Martin,et al.  Evaluating Reactions and Transfer of Skills from Blackboard Training , 2011 .

[4]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[5]  B. Wright,et al.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  T. Guskey Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development , 2002 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Mieke Clement,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Faculty Training Programme: Long‐term and institutional impact , 2007 .

[9]  G. Masters A rasch model for partial credit scoring , 1982 .

[10]  Steven Schneider,et al.  Integrating Literacy and Science in Biology , 2011 .

[11]  D. Cohen,et al.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works , 2001 .

[12]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Staff Development and School Change , 1978, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  M. Fullan Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[14]  T. Guskey Results-Oriented Professional Development: In Search of an Optimal Mix of Effective Practices. , 1994 .

[15]  Rob Phillips Tools used in learning management systems: Analysis of WebCT usage logs , 2006 .

[16]  Rosemary S. Caffarella,et al.  Professional Development for Faculty: A Conceptual Framework of Barriers and Supports , 1999 .

[17]  Ramon Garrote Jurado,et al.  Classification of the features in learning management systems , 2014 .

[18]  Sandy Buczynski,et al.  Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections , 2010 .

[19]  Arthur Eisenkraft,et al.  Teaching and Learning of Energy in K-12 Education , 2014 .

[20]  Defining Teacher Effectiveness on a Continuum: A Rasch Model Approach. , 1988 .

[21]  Rebecca Zwick,et al.  An Empirical Bayes Approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF Analysis. , 1999 .

[22]  A. Lerdal,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale-Rasch analyses of individual responses in a Norwegian stroke cohort. , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  Mesut Akdere,et al.  Clarifying Distance Education Roles and Competencies: Exploring Similarities and Differences Between Professional and Student-Practitioner Perspectives , 2005 .

[24]  H. Kanuka,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and the Online Classroom , 2013 .

[25]  Debbi Weaver The Challenges Facing Staff Development In Promoting Quality Online Teaching. , 2004 .

[26]  David Pedder,et al.  Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning , 2011 .

[27]  Item Response Theory: Overview, Applications, and Promise for Institutional Research , 2014 .

[28]  A psychometric measurement model for adult English language learners: Pearson Test of English Academic , 2012 .

[29]  Ann D. Thompson,et al.  Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers , 2011 .

[30]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Prioritization of online instructor roles: implications for competency‐based teacher education programs , 2009 .

[31]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Numbers Are Not Enough. Why e-Learning Analytics Failed to Inform an Institutional Strategic Plan , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  R. Phelps,et al.  Staff development for online delivery: a collaborative, team based action learning model , 2000 .

[33]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Becoming an Online Teacher: Adapting to a Changed Environment for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 2004 .

[34]  Peter E Williams,et al.  Roles and Competencies for Distance Education Programs in Higher Education Institutions , 2003 .

[35]  Annette Lamb,et al.  Workshops that Work!: Building an Effective, Technology-Rich Faculty Development Program. , 2005 .

[36]  Martin Mulder,et al.  Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[37]  M. Sasaki A comparison of two methods for detecting differential I item functioning in an ESL placement test , 1991 .

[38]  K. Royal,et al.  Measuring Academic Misconduct: Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Exams and Assignments Scale , 2015 .

[39]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  J. Twisk,et al.  Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[41]  C. Fox,et al.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2001 .

[42]  Luke Miratrix,et al.  Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science , 2012 .

[43]  Tasha Calvert Babiar Exploring differential item functioning (DIF) with the Rasch model: a comparison of gender differences on eighth grade science items in the United States and Spain. , 2011, Journal of applied measurement.

[44]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform. , 2003 .

[45]  Linda Bennett,et al.  A review of factors that influence the diffusion of innovation when structuring a faculty training program , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[46]  Jun Sun,et al.  Faculty Training and Student Perceptions: Does Quality Matter? , 2015 .

[47]  Ursula Stickler,et al.  New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online , 2005 .

[48]  Il-Hyun Jo,et al.  Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory , 2017 .

[49]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Doing what matters most : investing in quality teaching , 1997 .

[50]  Ana C. Stephens,et al.  A Successful Professional Development Project's Failure to Promote Online Discussion about Teaching , 2004 .

[51]  Anna Comas-Quinn,et al.  Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: an exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course , 2011, ReCALL.

[52]  Kathleen P. King,et al.  Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[54]  T. Guskey Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .

[55]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[56]  Measurement issues in screening outstanding teachers. , 2001, Journal of applied measurement.

[57]  John M Linacre,et al.  Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. , 2002, Journal of applied measurement.

[58]  M. Fullan The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[59]  Philip Barker,et al.  On Being an Online Tutor , 2002 .

[60]  Peter Van Petegem,et al.  The limits of programmed professional development on integration of information and communication technology in education , 2012 .

[61]  A. Correia,et al.  A professional development framework for online teaching , 2014, TechTrends.

[62]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Experts on super innovators: understanding staff adoption of learning management systems , 2018 .

[63]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[64]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-tivities: the key to active online learning, 2nd ed. , 2002 .

[65]  Elizabeth Stacey,et al.  Online interaction impacts on learning: teaching the teachers to teach online , 2004 .

[66]  Ibis M. Álvarez,et al.  University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience , 2010 .

[67]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .

[68]  Melinda M. Mangin,et al.  Leading Coherent Professional Development: A Comparison of Three Districts , 2005 .

[69]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice , 2010 .

[70]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Competences for online teaching: A special report , 2001 .

[71]  Ana-Paula Correia,et al.  A Faculty Mentoring Experience , 2010 .

[72]  D. Cohen A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier , 1990 .

[73]  Differential item and test functioning. , 2002 .