Performance Characteristics of Four High-Throughput Immunoassays for Detection of IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2

The role of serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in both the clinical and public health settings, will continue to evolve as we gain increasing insight into our immune response to the virus. Here, we evaluated four high-throughput serologic tests for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, from Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL), Epitope Diagnostics, Inc. (San Diego, CA), Euroimmun (Lubeck, Germany), and Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics (Rochester, NY), using a panel of serially collected serum samples (n = 224) from 56 patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), healthy donor sera from 2018, and a cross-reactivity serum panel collected in early 2020. ABSTRACT The role of serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in both the clinical and public health settings, will continue to evolve as we gain increasing insight into our immune response to the virus. Here, we evaluated four high-throughput serologic tests for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, from Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL), Epitope Diagnostics, Inc. (San Diego, CA), Euroimmun (Lubeck, Germany), and Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics (Rochester, NY), using a panel of serially collected serum samples (n = 224) from 56 patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), healthy donor sera from 2018, and a cross-reactivity serum panel collected in early 2020. The sensitivities of the Abbott, Epitope, Euroimmun, and Ortho-Clinical IgG assays in convalescent-phase serum samples collected more than 14 days post-symptom onset or post-initial positive reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) result were 92.9% (78/84), 88.1% (74/84), 97.6% (82/84), and 98.8% (83/84), respectively. Among unique convalescent patients, sensitivities of the Abbott, Epitope, Euroimmun, and Ortho-Clinical anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays were 97.3% (36/37), 73% (27/37), 94.6% (35/37), and 97.3% (36/37), respectively. Overall assay specificity/positive predictive values based on a 5% prevalence rate were 99.6%/92.8%, 99.6%/90.6%, 98.0%/71.2%, and 99.6%/92.5%, respectively, for the Abbott, Epitope, Euroimmun, and Ortho-Clinical IgG assays. In conclusion, we show high sensitivity in convalescent-phase sera and high specificity for the Abbott, Euroimmun, and Ortho-Clinical anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays. With the unprecedented influx of commercially available serologic tests for detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, it remains imperative that laboratories thoroughly evaluate such assays for accuracy prior to implementation.

[1]  M. Wener,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay and Seroprevalence in Boise, Idaho , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  Yan-ling Ma,et al.  Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  M. Clerici,et al.  Computational Inference of Selection Underlying the Evolution of the Novel Coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 , 2020, Journal of Virology.

[4]  Xinquan Wang,et al.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immunity in COVID-19 Convalescent Individuals , 2020, Immunity.

[5]  Mark S. Anderson,et al.  Test performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  Robert C. Walchak,et al.  Evaluation of Saline, Phosphate-Buffered Saline, and Minimum Essential Medium as Potential Alternatives to Viral Transport Media for SARS-CoV-2 Testing , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Tara C Smith,et al.  Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS–CoV-2/COVID-19 , 2020, mBio.

[8]  S. Esposito,et al.  Effects of Coronavirus Infections in Children , 2010, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  Jonathan E. Schmitz,et al.  Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  T. O'connor,et al.  Prevalence of Antibodies to Four Human Coronaviruses Is Lower in Nasal Secretions than in Serum , 2010, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[11]  O. Tsang,et al.  Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[12]  H. Chi,et al.  Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review. , 2020, Immunity.

[13]  Y. Yazdanpanah,et al.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2−Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients , 2020, Emerging infectious diseases.

[14]  Mei San Tang,et al.  Clinical Performance of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  E. Theel,et al.  The Role of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Is There One? , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.