The Usefulness and Safety of the Introducer Technique Using a Bumper-Button–Type Device as Compared With the Pull Method for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Purpose: To describe our initial experiences with the standardized introducer technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and to compare clinical outcomes and complications with the pull technique. Methods: The introducer technique was used on 91 patients. The clinical outcomes of procedures were retrospectively collected and compared with those of 22 patients who had procedures using the pull technique. Results: Mean operation time was significantly longer in the introducer technique group as compared with the pull technique group. Increased inflammation markers (body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein) were observed in the pull technique group as compared with the introducer technique group. Incidences of peristomal infection and pneumonia were lower in the introducer method group than in the pull method group. Conclusions: The introducer technique is a useful and safe method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in terms of reduced incidences of peristomal infection, pneumonia, pain, and discomfort.

[1]  M. Turchi,et al.  Effect of the introducer technique compared with the pull technique on the peristomal infection rate in PEG: a meta-analysis. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  M. Turchi,et al.  Assessment of safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an experience with 435 cases , 2009, BMC gastroenterology.

[3]  Toshiharu Yamaguchi,et al.  Reduced risk of peristomal infection of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: comparison with the pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  A. Horiuchi,et al.  Prospective randomized trial comparing the direct method using a 24 Fr bumper-button-type device with the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy , 2008, Endoscopy.

[5]  S. Galandiuk,et al.  Meta‐analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy , 2007, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[6]  R. Martindale,et al.  ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  I. Maetani,et al.  PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  J. Rey,et al.  Endoscopic management of a retrogastric abscess complicating laparoscopic appendectomy. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[9]  A. Axon,et al.  Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (E.S.G.E.) antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[10]  Williams Cn,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy , 2009, Gut.

[11]  R. Kozarek,et al.  Placement of a feeding button ("one-step button") as the initial procedure. , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  J. Ponsky,et al.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. , 1980, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  Glotzer Dj,et al.  Percutaneous reestablishment of feeding gastrostomies. , 1979 .

[14]  Amy Wang,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  K. Hashiba [Technic for opening a gastrostomy under endoscopic control and manipulation]. , 1980, Revista paulista de medicina.

[16]  D. J. Glotzer,et al.  Percutaneous reestablishment of feeding gastrostomies. , 1979, Surgery.