Sexual motivation in relation to social rank in pair-housed sows.

The influence of social subordination on sexual motivation during oestrus was studied using 36 sows of which 24 treatment sows were housed in pairs and 12 control sows were housed individually in 12 and 6 m(2) pens, respectively. Video recordings were made from 07:00 h to 19:00 h during the first 2 days after grouping, which took place 3 days after weaning of the piglets. Based on the aggressive interactions between the pair-housed sows, their rank was determined. From day 4 after weaning, a test for sexual proceptive behaviour was carried out twice daily and back-pressure test was carried out four times daily in order to detect standing oestrus. When standing oestrus had occurred, transrectal ultrasonographical scans were also carried out in order to determine if ovulation took place. The proceptivity test took place in a T-maze with a 2 m x 10 m runway ending in two 1.5 m x 1.5 m goal boxes each adjacent to a stimulus compartment. One compartment contained an adult sexually experienced boar and the other was empty. Latency to and duration of time spent close to the boar and time spent presenting were recorded during the 10-min test period. On the first day that standing oestrus had been detected, a test for sexual receptivity was also carried out by introducing the sow to a mature boar in his home pen (9 m(2)). Sexual- and fear-related behaviour of sow and boar were recorded until mating was terminated or the sow had spent 5 min in the pen without mating being initiated. During oestrus the proceptivity test showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the time spent standing close to the boar and in presenting for single-housed sows and for pair-housed dominant sows, but not for subordinate sows. During oestrus subordinate sows spent significantly less time standing close to the boar than the dominant sows (P = 0.01) and the same tended to be the case for presenting (P = 0.07). In the receptivity test more subordinate sows than dominant sows fled (40% versus 0%, P = 0.001) and more subordinate sows than dominant sows squealed (58% versus 15%, P = 0.02) as a response to boar stimulation. In both tests, the single-housed sows differed neither from the dominant nor the subordinate sows. There was however no difference between the groups in the weaning to oestrous interval, duration of oestrus and number of piglet born. In addition, all the sows ovulated. The results indicate that social subordination can have significant consequences for sexual motivation in sows. Subordinate sows showed fear-related behaviour in response to boar stimulation even when they were in standing oestrus. Thus, both heat detection and mating may be impaired in subordinate sows. The results emphasise the importance to alleviate the social stress experienced by subordinates as well as the need for stock people to pay special attention to these animals when they are to be mated or inseminated.

[1]  D. Beersma,et al.  SINGLE SOCIAL DEFEAT IN MALE-RATS INDUCES A GRADUAL BUT LONG LASTING BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE - A MODEL OF DEPRESSION , 1990 .

[2]  N. Sachser Short-term responses of plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, glucocorticoid and testosterone titers to social and non-social stressors in male guinea pigs of different social status , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  M. Ruis Social stress as a source of reduced welfare in pigs , 2001 .

[4]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Does frustration induce aggression in pigs , 1980 .

[5]  H. Dobson,et al.  Effect of transport on pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized ewes with or without prior steroid exposure at different times of year. , 1999, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[6]  E. Kanitz,et al.  Effects of dominance and familiarity on behaviour and plasma stress hormones in growing pigs during social confrontation. , 1999, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[7]  P. Jensen,et al.  An analysis of agonistic interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows — Aggression regulation through an “avoidance order” , 1982 .

[8]  B. Kemp,et al.  Assessment of the duration of ovulation in sows using ultrasonography. , 1991 .

[9]  J. Signoret Reproductive behaviour of pigs. , 1970, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[10]  H. Dobson,et al.  Effect of transport on pituitary responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in intact ewes. , 1999, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[11]  H. Dobson,et al.  Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone on gonadotrophin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone secretion in vitro. , 1997, Animal reproduction science.

[12]  Harold W. Gonyou,et al.  Integration of newly introduced and resident sows following grouping , 1993 .

[13]  E. Keverne,et al.  Suppression of oestrogen-induced LH surges by social subordination in talapoin monkeys , 1978, Nature.

[14]  M. Mendl,et al.  Physiological and reproductive correlates of behavioural strategies in female domestic pigs , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  C. F. Hansen,et al.  Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. II. Effects of space allowance , 1986 .

[16]  R. Liptrap,et al.  Steroid concentrations in follicular fluid of sows treated with dexamethasone , 1991 .

[17]  Stig Einarsson,et al.  Postweaning grouped sows: effects of aggression on hormonal patterns and oestrous behaviour , 1993 .

[18]  G. Moberg,et al.  Disruption of estrous behavior in ewes by dexamethasone or management-related stress. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[19]  S. Wasser,et al.  Reproductive control in wild baboons measured by fecal steroids. , 1996, Biology of reproduction.

[20]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Proceptive and receptive aspects of oestrus behaviour in gilts , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[21]  G. Moberg,et al.  Repeated acute stress during the follicular phase and luteinizing hormone surge of dairy heifers. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Andrew Steptoe,et al.  Stress, personal control and health. , 1989 .

[23]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  The effect of agonistic interactions on the heart rate of group-housed sows , 1995 .

[24]  J. Hodges,et al.  Social status controls LH secretion and ovulation in female marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). , 1988, The Journal of endocrinology.

[25]  J. Ray,et al.  Styles of dominance and their endocrine correlates among wild olive baboons (Papio anubis) , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[26]  R. Littell SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[27]  Lene Juul Pedersen,et al.  The Influence of Housing-Systems for Pregnant Sows on the Reproductive Behaviour at Oestrus , 1989 .

[28]  Ford Jj Reevaluation of the role of progesterone in stimulating sexual receptivity in estrogen-treated gilts. , 1985 .

[29]  H. Dobson,et al.  Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo. , 1999, Animal reproduction science.

[30]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[31]  D. Abbott,et al.  Sensory cues and the suppression of reproduction in subordinate female marmoset monkeys, Callithrix jacchus. , 1993, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[32]  Richard M. Sibly,et al.  Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer-controlled feeder , 1988 .

[33]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ON WELFARE STATUS AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR OF FEMALE PIGS. I. EFFECTS OF GROUP SIZE , 1986 .

[34]  Greg M. Cronin,et al.  Effects of pen size/shape and design on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs , 1993 .

[35]  N. Bennett,et al.  Anovulation in non-reproductive female Damaraland mole-rats (Cryptomys damarensis) , 2000 .

[36]  J J McGlone,et al.  A quantitative ethogram of aggressive and submissive behaviors in recently regrouped pigs. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[37]  G. B. Meese,et al.  The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig , 1973 .

[38]  C. Barb,et al.  Inhibition of ovulation and LH secretion in the gilt after treatment with ACTH or hydrocortisone. , 1982, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[39]  C. Shively,et al.  Behavior and physiology of social stress and depression in female cynomolgus monkeys , 1997, Biological Psychiatry.

[40]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[41]  R. Hinde Animal behaviour : a synthesis of ethology and comparative psychology , 1968 .

[42]  C. Packer,et al.  Reproductive constraints on aggressive competition in female baboons , 1995, Nature.

[43]  J. Koolhaas,et al.  Housing familiar male wildtype rats together reduces the long-term adverse behavioural and physiological effects of social defeat , 1999, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[44]  N. C. Mount,et al.  A study of aggression when group housed sows are mixed , 1993 .

[45]  J. Weisz,et al.  Preovulatory levels of luteinizing hormone, the critical period and ovulation in rats. , 1973, The Journal of endocrinology.

[46]  A. Mcneilly,et al.  Inhibition of ovarian function in subordinate female marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus jacchus). , 1981, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility.

[47]  Koolhaas,et al.  Long‐Lasting Deficient Dexamethasone Suppression of Hypothalamic‐Pituitary‐Adrenocortical Activation Following Peripheral CRF Challenge in Socially Defeated Rats , 1999, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[48]  N. V. Poll,et al.  The influence of Estrogen, Testosterone and Progesterone on partner preference, receptivity and proceptivity , 1986, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  K. H. Jensen,et al.  Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group-housing systems with electronic sow feeding: a field trial. , 2000 .

[50]  P. Moehlman,et al.  Jackal helpers and pup survival , 1979, Nature.

[51]  K. Brüssow,et al.  Agonistic interactions and physiological reactions of top- and bottom-ranking pigs confronted with a familiar and an unfamiliar group: Preliminary results , 1997 .

[52]  A. Marchlewska-Koj Sociogenic Stress and Rodent Reproduction , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[53]  H. Dobson,et al.  Suppression of LH response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone or oestradiol by ACTH(1-24) treatment in anoestrous ewes. , 1988, The Journal of endocrinology.

[54]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Pre- and Postpubertal LH and Estradiol Pattern in Gilts Subjected to Intermittent Inescapable Electroshock , 1996, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[55]  V. Wiegant,et al.  Effect of restraint stress on the preovulatory luteinizing hormone profile and ovulation in the rat. , 1995, European journal of endocrinology.

[56]  G. Hulse,et al.  Reversal of the anti-ovulatory action of stress in rats by prior administration of naloxone hydrochloride. , 1982, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[57]  Greg M. Cronin,et al.  Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs , 1992 .

[58]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[59]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Oestrus and mating behaviour in gilts during boar induced puberty in relation to stress and housing , 1997 .

[60]  J. Stookey,et al.  Effect of group composition and pen size on behavior, productivity and immune response of growing pigs , 1994 .

[61]  Erkens,et al.  Behavioural and physiological consequences of acute social defeat in growing gilts: effects of the social environment. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[62]  H. Dobson,et al.  Stress and Subfertility , 1998 .

[63]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.