Observability and sensitivity analysis of lightcurve measurement models for use in space situational awareness

ABSTRACT This paper deals with the observability and sensitivity analysis of the lightcurve measurement for use in the estimation of instantaneous pose (orientation) and shape geometry. Since several reflectance models exist that are typically used in obtaining a synthetic lightcurve measurement, they are compared to assess the observability or/and ‘sensitivity’ to determine the ‘best model’ for use. These measurement models are nonlinear with implicit and non-trivial dependency on the states; a numerical Jacobian as well as an unscented Kalman filter derived observation matrix are synthesized for each choice of the measurement model and compared. As the linearization is about an attitude (orientation) trajectory, distinct cases are considered to elaborate the results. For the cases evaluated here, it is shown that the attitude and shape/size can indeed be estimated from the lightcurve, but this is also dependent upon the initial conditions (subsequent attitude trajectory). Linear observability analysis of a discretized system is also performed with respect to the attitude states and shape/size parameters using the singular value decomposition of the observability matrix synthesized for a batch of measurements. The results are summarized for various initial conditions of the resident space object's attitude and angular velocity states.

[1]  I. Bar-Itzhack,et al.  Observability analysis of piece-wise constant systems with application to inertial navigation , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Kamesh Subbarao,et al.  Inverse problem formulation coupled with Unscented Kalman filtering for state and shape estimation of space objects , 2012 .

[3]  H. Klinkrad,et al.  Detecting, tracking and imaging space debris , 2002 .

[4]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  A Reflectance Model for Computer Graphics , 1987, TOGS.

[5]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Experimental analysis of BRDF models , 2005, EGSR '05.

[6]  Chris Sabol,et al.  Angles-Only Orbit Updates for Low-Earth-Orbit Satellites , 2007 .

[7]  Moriba Jah,et al.  Attitude Determination from Light Curves , 2009 .

[8]  Mikko Kaasalainen,et al.  Interpretation of lightcurves of atmosphereless bodies. I : General theory and new inversion schemes , 1992 .

[9]  Paul J. Cefola,et al.  Refining Space Object Radiation Pressure Modeling with Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Functions , 2014 .

[10]  Karri Muinonen,et al.  Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion. II. The Complete Inverse Problem , 2001 .

[11]  Kamesh Subbarao,et al.  Inverse problems in unresolved space object identification , 2011 .

[12]  M. Kaasalainen,et al.  Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion: I. Shape Determination , 2001 .

[13]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear controllability and observability , 1977 .

[14]  Bernard Friedland,et al.  Controllability Index Based on Conditioning Number , 1975 .

[15]  James F. Blinn,et al.  Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures , 1977, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  J. Junkins,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems , 2004 .

[17]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Non-linear approximation of reflectance functions , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Peter Shirley,et al.  An Anisotropic Phong BRDF Model , 2000, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[19]  S. F. Schmidt,et al.  Application of State-Space Methods to Navigation Problems , 1966 .

[20]  M. Kaasalainen,et al.  Optimization methods for asteroid lightcurve inversion , 1999 .

[21]  Aubrey B. Poore,et al.  Orbit Determination and Data Fusion in GEO , 2011 .

[22]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A comprehensive physical model for light reflection , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[23]  J. Ďurech,et al.  Shape Determination of the Asteroid (6053) 1993 BW3 , 2002 .

[24]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  David Geisler-Moroder,et al.  A New Ward BRDF Model with Bounded Albedo , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[26]  Taeyoung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear Observability for Relative Orbit Determination with Angles-Only Measurements , 2016 .

[27]  Long Rui,et al.  Observable Degree Analysis of SINS Initial Alignment Based on Singular Value Decomposition , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling Workshop.

[28]  I. Bar-Itzhack,et al.  Observability analysis of piece-wise constant systems. I. Theory , 1992 .

[29]  Chris Sabol,et al.  A Fresh Look at Angles-Only Orbit Determination , 2004 .

[30]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  Daniel O. Fulcoly,et al.  Determining Basic Satellite Shape from Photometric Light Curves , 2012 .

[32]  John L. Crassidis,et al.  Astrometric and Photometric Data Fusion for Resident Space Object Orbit, Attitude, and Shape Determination Via Multiple-Model Adaptive Estimation , 2010 .

[33]  Arne Dür,et al.  An Improved Normalization for the Ward Reflectance Model , 2006, J. Graph. Tools.

[34]  Mikko Kaasalainen,et al.  Interpretation of lightcurves of atmosphereless bodies. II - Practical aspects of inversion , 1992 .

[35]  Kamesh Subbarao,et al.  ‘Inverse Crime’ and Model Integrity in Lightcurve Inversion applied to unresolved Space Object Identification , 2017 .