The Lessons of GIST — PET and PET / CT : A New Paradigm for Imaging

Traditional anatomic tumor response criteria are based on uni- or bidimensional changes in tumor size, and do not take into account changes in tumor metabolism, tumor density, or decrease in the number of intratumoral vessels. These changes are, however, all indicative of response to imatinib therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In these patients, metabolic responses seen on positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) have been shown to be closely related to clinical benefit. Furthermore, these metabolic changes precede by weeks or months significant decrease in tumor size on computed tomography (CT). Conversely, lack of metabolic response on FDG-PET indicates primary resistance to the drug and may help identify patients who would benefit from another therapy, while re-emergence of metabolic activity within tumor sites following a period of therapeutic response indicates secondary resistance to the drug. Newly proposed CT criteria using either no growth in tumor size or a combination of tumor density and size criteria have shown a close correlation with the predictive value results of FDG-PET. Thus, the integration of FDG-PET and CT, as in the combined hybrid PET/CT scanners now available, will not only optimize the evaluation of patients with GIST treated with molecularly targeted drugs, but may ultimately help shorten clinical trials, and accelerate drug development in this disease and other cancers as well.

[1]  C. Jaffe Response assessment in clinical trials: implications for sarcoma clinical trial design. , 2008, The oncologist.

[2]  Haesun Choi,et al.  Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2008, The oncologist.

[3]  J. Manola,et al.  Imaging kinase target inhibition with SU11248 by FDG-PET in patients (pts) with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (I-R GIST) , 2005 .

[4]  Eric P Tamm,et al.  CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: a quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Use of computerized tomography (CT) as an early prognostic indicator of response to imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Effects of cessation of imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy in patients (pts) with IM-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) as visualized by FDG-PET scanning. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Comparison of PET, CT, and dual-modality PET/CT imaging for monitoring of imatinib (STI571) therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Stephanie Green,et al.  Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteria , 1992, Investigational New Drugs.

[9]  D. Podoloff,et al.  The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  D. Podoloff,et al.  The Role of 18 F-FDG PET in Staging and Early Prediction of Response to Therapy of Recurrent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2003 .

[11]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Tuveson,et al.  Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[15]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.