Stereopsis from contrast envelopes

We report two experiments concerning the site of the principal nonlinearity in second-order stereopsis. The first exploits the asymmetry in perceiving transparency with second-order stimuli found by Langley et al. (1998) (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 1837-1845) i.e. the product of a positive-valued contrast envelope and a mean-zero carrier grating can be seen transparently only when the disparities are consistent with the envelope appearing in front of the carrier. We measured the energy at the envelope frequencies that must be added in order to negate this asymmetry. We report that this amplitude can be predicted from the envelope sidebands and not from the magnitude of compressive pre-cortical nonlinearities measured by other researchers. In the second experiment, contrast threshold elevations were measured for the discrimination of envelope disparities following adaptation to sinusoidal gratings. It is reported that perception of the envelope's depth was affected most when the adapting grating was similar (in orientation and frequency) to the carrier, rather than to the contrast envelope. These results suggest that the principal nonlinearity in second-order stereopsis is cortical, occurring after orientation- and frequency-selective linear filtering.

[1]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions , 1981 .

[2]  D. Kersten.  Transparency and the cooperative computation of scene attributes , 1991 .

[3]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Scale selection for second-order (non-linear) stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[4]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[5]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Evidence for non-linear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. , 1973, Vision research.

[6]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational models of visual processing , 1991 .

[7]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Linear and nonlinear transparencies in binocular vision , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Linear filtering precedes nonlinear processing in early vision , 1996, Current Biology.

[9]  H. Wilson,et al.  Neural models of stereoscopic vision , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Differences in Processing Time for Stereoscopic Inclination and Slant , 1997 .

[11]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.

[12]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[13]  A. Papoulis.  Signal Analysis , 1977 .

[14]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  Mary M. Conte,et al.  Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  F Metelli,et al.  The perception of transparency. , 1974, Scientific American.

[18]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[19]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[20]  T. Poggio,et al.  The analysis of stereopsis. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  S. Laughlin.  Matching coding, circuits, cells, and molecules to signals: General principles of retinal design in the fly's eye , 1994, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[22]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  The perception of transparency with achromatic colors , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  S M Würger,et al.  Depth Interpolation with Sparse Disparity Cues , 1989, Perception.

[24]  R D Freeman,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Stereopsis: How Do Simple Cells in the Visual Cortex Encode Binocular Disparity? , 1995, Perception.

[25]  D. Hubel.  Eye, brain, and vision , 1988 .

[26]  Keith Langley.  Degenerate Models of Additive and Multiplicative Motion Transparency , 1997, BMVC.

[27]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Weinshall.  Seeing “ghost” planes in stereo vision , 1991, Vision Research.

[30]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[31]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis , 1994, Vision Research.

[32]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Perception of transparency in man and machine , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[33]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Halpern,et al.  Stereopsis from motion-defined contours , 1991, Vision Research.

[35]  Hibbard Pb,et al.  Linear and non-linear mechanisms in the perception of stereoscopic slant and transparency. , 1998 .

[36]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detection of spatial beats: Non-linearity or contrast increment detection? , 1986, Vision Research.

[37]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Evidence for disparity detecting neurones in the human visual system , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  Mischa Schwartz,et al.  Information transmission, modulation, and noise , 1959 .

[39]  P. Lennie,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[40]  R.N. Bracewell,et al.  Signal analysis , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[41]  Keith Langley,et al.  Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[42]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Mayhew,et al.  The Relationship between Apparent Depth and Disparity in Rivalrous-Texture Stereograms , 1978, Perception.

[44]  L. Cormack,et al.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing , 1991, Vision Research.

[45]  A. Pantle,et al.  On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast variations: Velocity discrimination , 1989, Vision Research.

[46]  A. Parker,et al.  Stereo, surfaces and shape , 1991 .

[47]  J. Beck.  Perception of transparency in man and machine , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.