How can accelerated development of bioenergy contribute to the future UK energy mix? Insights from a MARKAL modelling exercise

BackgroundThis work explores the potential contribution of bioenergy technologies to 60% and 80% carbon reductions in the UK energy system by 2050, by outlining the potential for accelerated technological development of bioenergy chains. The investigation was based on insights from MARKAL modelling, detailed literature reviews and expert consultations. Due to the number and complexity of bioenergy pathways and technologies in the model, three chains and two underpinning technologies were selected for detailed investigation: (1) lignocellulosic hydrolysis for the production of bioethanol, (2) gasification technologies for heat and power, (3) fast pyrolysis of biomass for bio-oil production, (4) biotechnological advances for second generation bioenergy crops, and (5) the development of agro-machinery for growing and harvesting bioenergy crops. Detailed literature searches and expert consultations (looking inter alia at research and development needs and economic projections) led to the development of an 'accelerated' dataset of modelling parameters for each of the selected bioenergy pathways, which were included in five different scenario runs with UK-MARKAL (MED). The results of the 'accelerated runs' were compared with a low-carbon (LC-Core) scenario, which assesses the cheapest way to decarbonise the energy sector.ResultsBioenergy was deployed in larger quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with the LC-Core scenario. In the electricity sector, solid biomass was highly utilised for energy crop gasification, displacing some deployment of wind power, and nuclear and marine to a lesser extent. Solid biomass was also deployed for heat in the residential sector from 2040 in much higher quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with LC-Core. Although lignocellulosic ethanol increased, overall ethanol decreased in the transport sector in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario due to a reduction in ethanol produced from wheat.ConclusionThere is much potential for future deployment of bioenergy technologies to decarbonise the energy sector. However, future deployment is dependent on many different factors including investment and efforts towards research and development needs, carbon reduction targets and the ability to compete with other low carbon technologies as they become deployed. All bioenergy technologies should become increasingly more economically competitive with fossil-based technologies as feedstock costs and flexibility are reduced in line with technological advances.

[1]  Lee R. Lynd,et al.  Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass , 2009 .

[2]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[3]  André Faaij,et al.  Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices , 2006 .

[4]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Scenarios and Sensitivities on Long-term UK Carbon Reductions using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL-Macro Energy System Models , 2008 .

[5]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Accelerated Development of Low Carbon Energy Supply Technologies, UKERC Energy 2050 Research Report 2 , 2009 .

[6]  J. Eastham.  UK Department Of Trade And Industry - European Funding Seminar. , 2001 .

[7]  N. Stern.  What is the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[8]  Marie E. Walsh,et al.  U.S. bioenergy crop economic analyses: status and needs. , 1998 .

[9]  L. Gomez,et al.  Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing's on the walls. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[10]  Sheryl A. Martin,et al.  Breaking the Biological barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda , 2006 .

[11]  Gail Taylor.  Bioenergy for heat and electricity in the UK , 2006 .

[12]  C. Marrison,et al.  COST VERSUS SCALE FOR ADVANCED PLANTATION-BASED BIOMASS ENERGY SYSfEMS IN . THE U . s . , 2005 .

[13]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[14]  Dilys Williams,et al.  Promoting sustainable Indian textiles: final report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), London, UK , 2010 .

[15]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[16]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[17]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Short-rotation forestry – operations, productivity and costs based on experience gained in the UK , 1999 .

[18]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Technological learning and cost reductions in wood fuel supply chains in Sweden , 2005 .

[19]  Pete Smith,et al.  Energy crops: current status and future prospects , 2006 .

[20]  J. Scurlock,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[21]  J. Houghton,et al.  Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda , 2006 .

[22]  Map Taylor,et al.  NEW AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[23]  John Brammer,et al.  Opportunities for biomass-derived "bio-oil" in European heat and power markets , 2006 .