Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees.

OBJECTIVE To study limitations in function and adjustment strategies in lower limb amputees during obstacle crossing. DESIGN Observational cohort study. SUBJECTS Transfemoral and transtibial amputees and able-bodied control subjects. METHODS In a motion analysis laboratory unimpeded and obstacle crossing runs were performed. The subjects stepped over an obstacle of 0.1m height and thickness and 1m width. Outcome measures were gait velocity, hip, knee and ankle joint angles and leading limb preference. RESULTS Whereas able-bodied and transtibial subjects demonstrated an increase in knee flexion during obstacle crossing compared to unimpeded walking, in transfemoral amputees the opposite was seen, namely a decrease in knee flexion. The lack of knee strategy in transfemoral amputees was compensated by circumduction at the hip on the prosthetic side and plantar flexion of the non-affected ankle. Transtibial amputees preferred to cross the obstacle with the prosthetic limb first, while transfemoral amputees preferred the non-affected limb. CONCLUSION The different leading limb strategy in transfemoral and transtibial amputees could be explained by the restricted flexion and propulsion properties of the prosthetic knee. Training of obstacle crossing tasks during rehabilitation and improvement of prosthetic design may contribute to safe obstacle crossing.

[1]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  B. J. McFadyen,et al.  Anticipatory locomotor adjustments for accommodating versus avoiding level changes in humans , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  W. Miller,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  L. Draganich,et al.  Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Understanding the contribution of binocular vision to the control of adaptive locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  A E Patla,et al.  Obstacle crossing in subjects with stroke. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width , 1993 .

[8]  K. Kaufman,et al.  Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[9]  M. Latash,et al.  Anticipatory postural adjustments during standing in below-the-knee amputees. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  A. E. Patla,et al.  The effects of human ankle muscle vibration on posture and balance during adaptive locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  A E Patla,et al.  Altered kinetic strategy for the control of swing limb elevation over obstacles in unilateral below-knee amputee gait. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Mark Speechley,et al.  Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[13]  A. Patla,et al.  Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  L. Draganich,et al.  Stepping over an obstacle increases the motions and moments of the joints of the trailing limb in young adults. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  K R Kaufman,et al.  Motion of the whole body's center of mass when stepping over obstacles of different heights. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[16]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[17]  A. Patla,et al.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  Stephen D Prentice,et al.  Swing phase kinetics and kinematics of knee replacement patients during obstacle avoidance. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[19]  C Kirtley,et al.  Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. , 1985, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[20]  J. Hunter,et al.  A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  Chou,et al.  Increasing obstacle height and decreasing toe-obstacle distance affect the joint moments of the stance limb differently when stepping over an obstacle. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[22]  D Datta,et al.  A pilot study comparing the cognitive demand of walking for transfemoral amputees using the Intelligent Prosthesis with that using conventionally damped knees , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[23]  A. Schultz,et al.  Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[24]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  The influence of multiple obstacles in the travel path on avoidance strategy. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[25]  H. Day,et al.  The assessment and description of amputee activity , 1981, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  P. Crenna,et al.  A motor programme for the initiation of forward‐oriented movements in humans. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Louis F Draganich,et al.  The effects of walking speed on obstacle crossing in healthy young and healthy older adults. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  M. Hahn,et al.  Age-related reduction in sagittal plane center of mass motion during obstacle crossing. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Milad G. Ishac,et al.  Kinematic patterns of participants with a below-knee prosthesis stepping over obstacles of various heights during locomotion , 1997 .