Neurons sense nanoscale roughness with nanometer sensitivity

The interaction between cells and nanostructured materials is attracting increasing interest, because of the possibility to open up novel concepts for the design of smart nanobiomaterials with active biological functionalities. In this frame we investigated the response of human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) to gold surfaces with different levels of nanoroughness. To achieve a precise control of the nanoroughness with nanometer resolution, we exploited a wet chemistry approach based on spontaneous galvanic displacement reaction. We demonstrated that neurons sense and actively respond to the surface nanotopography, with a surprising sensitivity to variations of few nanometers. We showed that focal adhesion complexes, which allow cellular sensing, are strongly affected by nanostructured surfaces, leading to a marked decrease in cell adhesion. Moreover, cells adherent on nanorough surfaces exhibit loss of neuron polarity, Golgi apparatus fragmentation, nuclear condensation, and actin cytoskeleton that is not functionally organized. Apoptosis/necrosis assays established that nanoscale features induce cell death by necrosis, with a trend directly related to roughness values. Finally, by seeding SH-SY5Y cells onto micropatterned flat and nanorough gold surfaces, we demonstrated the possibility to realize substrates with cytophilic or cytophobic behavior, simply by fine-tuning their surface topography at nanometer scale. Specific and functional adhesion of cells occurred only onto flat gold stripes, with a clear self-alignment of neurons, delivering a simple and elegant approach for the design and development of biomaterials with precise nanostructure-triggered biological responses.

[1]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[2]  Kazuhiko Ishihara,et al.  Protein adsorption and cell adhesion on cationic, neutral, and anionic 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine copolymer surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[3]  W. Hong,et al.  Autoantigen Golgin-97, an effector of Arl1 GTPase, participates in traffic from the endosome to the trans-golgi network. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Zheng Jing,et al.  Focal adhesions regulate Abeta signaling and cell death in Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  A. Ito,et al.  Cell-patterning using poly (ethylene glycol)-modified magnetite nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  A. Emons,et al.  Boekbespreking: Molecular biology of the cell, B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Robers, D.J. Watson. Garland Publ., New York. 1989. , 1990 .

[10]  Toshio Igarashi,et al.  Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts , 2009, Biomedical materials.

[11]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase‐dependent regulation of adhesive forces involves vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions , 2010, Biology of the cell.

[12]  S. Dedhar,et al.  Integrin-linked kinase – essential roles in physiology and cancer biology , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[13]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Physical approaches to biomaterial design. , 2009, Nature materials.

[14]  C. Cotman,et al.  Cooperation between nerve growth factor and laminin or fibronectin in promoting sensory neuron survival and neurite outgrowth. , 1988, Brain research.

[15]  R. Cingolani,et al.  Micro/nanoscale patterning of nanostructured metal substrates for plasmonic applications. , 2009, ACS nano.

[16]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  T. Ebendal,et al.  Differential outgrowth of retinal neurites on purified extracellular matrix molecules , 1988, Journal of neuroscience research.

[18]  F. Rosei,et al.  Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. , 2009, Nano letters.

[19]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Manipulation of selective cell adhesion and growth by surface charges of electrically polarized hydroxyapatite. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  M. Brocco,et al.  Survival and process regrowth of purified chick retinal ganglion cells cultured in a growth factor lacking medium at low density. Modulation by extracellular matrix proteins. , 1999, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[21]  M. Ehlers,et al.  Dual Modes of Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Golgi Transport in Dendrites Revealed by Live-Cell Imaging , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  S. Itzkovitz,et al.  Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  David R Critchley,et al.  The structure and regulation of vinculin. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[25]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[26]  A. Athanassiou,et al.  Microscale patterning of hydrophobic/hydrophilic surfaces by spatially controlled galvanic displacement reactions. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[28]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Molecular engineering of cellular environments: cell adhesion to nano-digital surfaces. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[30]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: implications for nanomedical devices. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[31]  D. Brunette,et al.  The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  Christoph Ballestrem,et al.  Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  P. Favia,et al.  Behaviour of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line grown in different media and on different chemically modified substrates. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[34]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[35]  E. Chan,et al.  Fragmentation of Golgi complex and Golgi autoantigens during apoptosis and necrosis , 2002, Arthritis research.

[36]  G. Tanentzapf,et al.  Multiple factors contribute to integrin-talin interactions in vivo , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[37]  K. El Kirat,et al.  Characterization of biomaterials polar interactions in physiological conditions using liquid-liquid contact angle measurements: relation to fibronectin adsorption. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[38]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[39]  Benjamin M. Wu,et al.  Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.