Serial Molecular Profiling of Low-grade Prostate Cancer to Assess Tumor Upgrading: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Boonstra | S. Tomlins | A. Sisk | T. Morgan | J. Tosoian | J. Siddiqui | G. Palapattu | L. Kunju | A. Udager | L. Marks | S. Salami | S. Natarajan | Tonye A. Jones | C. Liu | Fuad F. Elkhoury | S. Nallandhighal | K. Plouffe | Scott Brockman | Selena Bazzi | Lauren C. Sumida
[1] J. Brooks,et al. 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Results in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) Cohort. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] K. Macura,et al. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort. , 2020, European urology.
[3] V. Laudone,et al. Role of Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Clinical Stage in Evaluation of Disease Progression for Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance. , 2019, European urology.
[4] A. D'Amico,et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[5] A. D'Amico,et al. Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015 , 2019, JAMA.
[6] G. Pond,et al. Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial. , 2019, European urology.
[7] M. Rubin,et al. Transcriptomic heterogeneity in multifocal prostate cancer. , 2018, JCI insight.
[8] D. Margolis,et al. Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[9] David Gillatt,et al. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[10] K. Macura,et al. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance. , 2017, European urology.
[11] Adam D. DePriest,et al. Intratumoral and Intertumoral Genomic Heterogeneity of Multifocal Localized Prostate Cancer Impacts Molecular Classifications and Genomic Prognosticators. , 2017, European urology.
[12] Wei Li,et al. Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancers Emerge through Branched Evolution of Clonal Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.
[13] S. Tomlins,et al. Molecular Profiling to Determine Clonality of Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies from Men on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.
[14] H. Hricak,et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference , 2016, European Radiology.
[15] M. Cooperberg,et al. Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013. , 2015, JAMA.
[16] Paul D. Williams,et al. Development and Validation of a Scalable Next-Generation Sequencing System for Assessing Relevant Somatic Variants in Solid Tumors12 , 2015, Neoplasia.
[17] Danny Vesprini,et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[18] Geoffrey A. Sonn,et al. Initial experience with electronic tracking of specific tumor sites in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. , 2014, Urologic oncology.
[19] K. Pienta,et al. Frequent discordance between ERG gene rearrangement and ERG protein expression in a rapid autopsy cohort of patients with lethal, metastatic, castration‐resistant prostate cancer , 2014, The Prostate.
[20] Christopher D. Brown,et al. Low-grade prostate cancer diverges early from high grade and metastatic disease , 2014, Cancer science.
[21] Lurdes Y T Inoue,et al. Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study , 2014, Statistics in medicine.
[22] Jennifer R. Rider,et al. Gleason grade progression is uncommon. , 2013, Cancer research.
[23] G. Bubley,et al. Clonal progression of prostate cancers from Gleason grade 3 to grade 4. , 2013, Cancer research.
[24] A. Chinnaiyan,et al. Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangements in prostate core biopsies, including diagnostically challenging cases: ERG staining in prostate core biopsies. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[25] Matthew R Cooperberg,et al. Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[26] S. Varambally,et al. Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangement-positive prostate cancer. , 2010, Neoplasia.
[27] R. Shah,et al. Characterization of TMPRSS2-ETS gene aberrations in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.
[28] R. Shah,et al. Heterogeneity of TMPRSS2 gene rearrangements in multifocal prostate adenocarcinoma: molecular evidence for an independent group of diseases. , 2007, Cancer research.
[29] M. Terris,et al. Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy , 2006, Cancer.
[30] Michael Ittmann,et al. Expression of variant TMPRSS2/ERG fusion messenger RNAs is associated with aggressive prostate cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.
[31] B. Trock,et al. Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[32] E. Crawford,et al. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. , 2003, Urology.
[33] P. Walsh,et al. Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease. , 2001, The Journal of urology.
[34] S. Lipsitz,et al. Variation in the use of active surveillance for low‐risk prostate cancer , 2018, Cancer.
[35] David C. Miller,et al. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer. , 2015, European urology.
[36] A. D'Amico,et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[37] Anthony D'Amico,et al. Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2007, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.