Optimized Design of Concrete Structures considering Environmental Aspects

This contribution describes a formulation of the optimized design of structures using the probability-based optimization method. The Monte Carlo simulation method, modified by the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method, was used for the calculation of the reliability of a designed structure. Efficient design procedures can achieve not only cost savings during construction (materials and energy), erection, servicing, maintenance, disassembly and material recycling but also a more favourable environmental impact. To find the best possible design for a structure an original optimization method was used. Therefore, the economical and ecological aspects (acquisition costs, CO2 and SO2 emissions and embodied energy associated with concrete member production) were taken into account in the objective function. A design example – a prestressed spun concrete pole made from reinforced concrete or alternatively from reinforced fibre concrete is presented.

[1]  Petr Hájek,et al.  fib Bulletin 47. Environmental design of concrete structures – general principles , 2008 .

[2]  Pavel Popela,et al.  Deterministic and Reliability Based Structural Optimization of Concrete Cross-section , 2007 .

[3]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost* , 2007 .

[4]  D. Novák,et al.  Small-sample probabilistic assessment-FREET software , 2003 .

[5]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[6]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  The use of lifetime functions in the optimization of interventions on existing bridges considering maintenance and failure costs , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimization in Structural Engineering , 1994 .

[8]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Cost Optimization of Structures: Fuzzy Logic, Genetic Algorithms, and Parallel Computing , 2006 .

[9]  Victor Yepes,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of Concrete Frames by Simulated Annealing , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Ivana Laníková,et al.  Fully probabilistic design: the way for optimizing of concrete structures , 2011 .

[11]  D. Novák,et al.  CORRELATION CONTROL IN SMALL-SAMPLE MONTE CARLO TYPE SIMULATIONS I: A SIMULATED ANNEALING APPROACH , 2009 .

[12]  Petr Hájek,et al.  Life cycle assessments of concrete structures – a step towards environmental savings , 2011 .

[13]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Probabilistic Lifetime-Oriented Multiobjective Optimization of Bridge Maintenance: Combination of Maintenance Types , 2006 .

[14]  Pavel Popela,et al.  Optimum beam design via stochastic programming , 2010, Kybernetika.

[15]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Life-cycle performance, management, and optimisation of structural systems under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges 1 , 2011, Structures and Infrastructure Systems.

[16]  David Lehký,et al.  ANN inverse analysis based on stochastic small-sample training set simulation , 2006, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  C. R. Sundararajan,et al.  Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook: Theory and Industrial Applications , 1995 .

[18]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Cost Optimization of Concrete Structures , 1999 .

[19]  J. Roupec,et al.  Scenario Generation And Analysis by Heuristic Algorithms , 2007 .

[20]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[21]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Structural Reliability Assessment Using Latin Hypercube Sampling , 1990 .

[22]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Approximate reanalysis in topology optimization , 2009 .

[23]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Reliability-Based Lifetime Performance Prediction Using Simulation , 2005 .

[24]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimum Structural Design , 1995 .