The contingent role of interproject connectedness in cultivating open source software projects

Abstract A better understanding of the key to successful open-source software (OSS) development continues to motivate research. Aligned with work that builds on the notion that an OSS development is tightly interrelated with its social environment (i.e., the OSS community), this study examines the relationship between interproject structure and OSS project success. OSS project success is reflected in two forms: popularity and knowledge creation. Extending the extant OSS literature, we theorize a contingent role of interproject connectedness. In particular, we posit three points: (1) an OSS project with more structural holes achieves higher popularity; (2) an OSS project with fewer structural holes yields higher knowledge creation; and (3) these two relationships are enhanced by an increase in project maturity. Using a dataset longitudinally collected from SourceForge.net, we found that OSS projects with widespread connectedness are more popular. This is especially so for those OSS projects in the mid-mature stage. We also found that OSS projects with a cohesive network achieve higher knowledge creation, irrespective of their maturity. Findings from our study can contribute to OSS literature by identifying OSS projects that are more likely to be successful.

[1]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  From Peer Production to Productization: A Study of Socially Enabled Business Exchanges in Open Source Service Networks , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[3]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[5]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation‐as‐experimentation and firm performance: The enabling role of absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[6]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[8]  Li Chen,et al.  Theory and Analysis of Company-Sponsored Value Co-Creation , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Xin Li,et al.  Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Teamwork quality and project success in software development: A survey of agile development teams , 2016, J. Syst. Softw..

[11]  Mark Aberdour.  A people-focused , 2022 .

[12]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  How Peripheral Developers Contribute to Open-Source Software Development , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[14]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[15]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Which ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success , 2003 .

[16]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open source software community , 2011, First Monday.

[18]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Network Analysis of the SourceForge.net Community , 2007, OSS.

[20]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Alan MacCormarck.  Product-Development Practices That Work: How Internet Companies Build Software , 2001 .

[22]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality and the Relationship between Structural Holes and Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[23]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[24]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Hierarchy and centralization in free and open source software team communications , 2006 .

[25]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[26]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The Governance and Control of Open Source Software Projects , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Sherae L. Daniel,et al.  Sourcing knowledge in open source software projects: The impacts of internal and external social capital on project success , 2018, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Shirish C. Srivastava,et al.  Does Superposition Influence the Success of FLOSS Projects? An Examination of Open-Source Software Development by Organizations and Individuals , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Linda Dailey Paulson.  Developers shift to dynamic programming languages , 2007, Computer.

[30]  Wen Wen,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement on Open Source Software Project Success , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Martin Everett,et al.  Ego network betweenness , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[32]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Using Open Innovation to Identify the Best Ideas , 2013 .

[34]  M. Tortoriello.  The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge , 2015 .

[35]  Rishab Ghosh.  CODE : collaborative ownership and the digital economy , 2005 .

[36]  Mikael Holmqvist.  A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning , 2003 .

[37]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[39]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[40]  Michael Smithson,et al.  A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[41]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[42]  Param Vir Singh,et al.  Network Effects: The Influence of Structural Capital on Open Source Project Success , 2011, MIS Q..

[43]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Lock-In Strategy in Software Competition: Open-Source Software vs. Proprietary Software , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development , 2007, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[46]  A. Tsui,et al.  When Brokers May Not Work: The Cultural Contingency of Social Capital in Chinese High-tech Firms , 2007 .

[47]  John Qi Dong,et al.  The faster the better? Innovation speed and user interest in open source software , 2019, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[49]  LindsjørnYngve,et al.  Teamwork quality and project success in software development , 2016 .

[50]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Effects of Diversity in Global, Distributed Collectives: A Study of Open Source Project Success , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[52]  P. Blau.  Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[53]  Gang Peng,et al.  Network ties and the success of open source software development , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[54]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[55]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Emergent Decision-Making Practices in Free/Libre Open Source Software (Floss) Development Teams , 2007, OSS.

[56]  Alex Coad,et al.  Innovation and Firm Growth: Does Firm Age Play a Role? , 2013 .

[57]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .

[58]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[59]  John Riedl,et al.  The Impact and Evolution of Group Diversity in Online Open Collaboration , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[60]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: List of Illustrations , 1994 .

[62]  S. Zahra,et al.  The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[63]  Chandrasekar Subramaniam,et al.  Determinants of open source software project success: A longitudinal study , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[64]  Param Vir Singh,et al.  The small-world effect , 2010, ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol..

[65]  Dominique Thon,et al.  An axiomatization of the Gini coefficient , 1982, Math. Soc. Sci..

[66]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[67]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[68]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations , 2006 .

[69]  J. Coleman.  FREE RIDERS AND ZEALOTS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1988 .

[70]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams , 2007 .

[71]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[72]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The business of open source , 2008, CACM.

[73]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[74]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[75]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Followership in an Open-Source Software Project and its Significance in Code Reuse , 2019, MIS Q..

[76]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Emergence of New Project Teams from Open Source Software Developer Networks: Impact of Prior Collaboration Ties , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..