Multiple Testing Versus Multiple Estimation. Improper Confidence Sets. Estimation of Directions and Ratios
暂无分享,去创建一个
0. Summary. The "S-method" of multiple comparison ([5]; [6], Section 3.5) was intended for multiple estimation, possibly combined with multiple testing. It is shown that if only multiple testing is desired a certain "modified S-method" is more powerful. While this result is of some theoretical interest, it is recommended after a discussion of the relative advantages of the two methods, that the new one generally not be used in applications. The multiple testing problems considered are related to estimating the direction of a vector or its unoriented direction-estimation problems which also have an inherent interest. A confidence set for a parameter point is called improper if the probability that it gives a trivially true statement is positive. The problems of estimating the direction and unoriented direction of a vector are reformulated to permit solution by proper confidence sets. In the case of the unoriented direction of a q-dimensional vector the confidence sets yield solutions of the problem of joint estimation of q -1 ratios and the problem of multiple estimation of all ratios in a certain infinite set. Specializing to the case q = 2 yields a proper confidence set as a substitute for Fieller's improper confidence set for a ratio. 1. Introduction. The reader interested only in Fieller's problem of estimating a ratio may proceed directly to the discussion following the Corollary near the end of Section 5. The reader not interested in multiple testing but in the estimation of directions and ratios may read through the sentence containing equation (3) and then skip to Section 3. We use the term "testing" to include the trichotomous procedure where if a hypothesis 0 = 0 is rejected by a two-tailed test we decide on one of the alternatives 0 > 0 or 0 < 0. "Estimation" refers to estimation by confidence intervals or other confidence sets. The problems will be treated under the underlying assumptions Q usually made in the analysis of variance,
[1] C. I. Bliss. THE COMPARISON OF DOSAGE-MORTALITY DATA , 1935 .
[2] E. C. Fieller. The Biological Standardization of Insulin , 1940 .
[3] H. Scheffé. A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1953 .
[4] E. C. Fieller. SOME PROBLEMS IN INTERVAL ESTIMATION , 1954 .
[5] H. Scheffé. The Analysis of Variance , 1960 .
[6] G. S. Watson,et al. Equatorial distributions on a sphere , 1965 .