Printability verification for double-patterning technology

For keeping pace with Moore's Law of reducing the feature sizes on integrated circuits, the driving forces have been reductions in the exposure-tool wavelength, and increases in the lens numerical aperture (NA). With extreme ultra-violet (EUV) lithography and 3rd-generation immersion delayed for production use, these driving forces are now stalled at a wavelength of 193 nm and an NA of 1.35. Therefore, double-patterning technology (DPT) is needed for printing 22 nm device node features. With DPT, a 22 nm layout is split into two patterns. Each pattern is printed using 32 nm node lithography technology, and the original pattern is recovered by a logical summation (the Boolean OR operation) of these two separately exposed patterns. DPT presents several challenges for printability verification. First, the etch target can be very different from the resist target because significant biasing is used to improve the lithography process window. Second, overlaps between the two patterns produce new problems such as sharp-cornered pinching at pattern junctions, and bridging between patterns. Finally, there are additional process variations: misalignment between the two patterns, and twice as many dose and defocus dimensions. We present results from a full-chip DPT-verification tool that addresses these challenges. We also provide examples of lithography problems that are specific to DPT, and describe possible guidance for the resolution enhancement techniques (RET) and design tools.

[1]  Apo Sezginer,et al.  A rigorous method to determine printability of a target layout , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Alfred Kwok-Kit Wong,et al.  Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography , 2001 .

[3]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  ACLV driven double-patterning decomposition with extensively added printing assist features (PrAFs) , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Hatsuyuki Tanaka,et al.  Advanced microlithography process with chemical shrink technology , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Kohji Hashimoto,et al.  A study of mask specification in spacer patterning technology , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[7]  Vincent Wiaux,et al.  Interactions of double patterning technology with wafer processing, OPC and design flows , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Jungchul Park,et al.  Dark field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for 45nm node and beyond , 2006, Photomask Japan.

[9]  Soichi Inoue,et al.  Development of hot spot fixer (HSF) , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Automatic hotspot classification using pattern-based clustering , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  James P. Shiely,et al.  Etch modeling in RET synthesis and verification flow , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[12]  Mireille Maenhoudt,et al.  Alternative process schemes for double patterning that eliminate the intermediate etch step , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Min-Chun Tsai Describing litho-constrained layout by a high-resolution model filter , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[14]  Vincent Wiaux,et al.  Split and design guidelines for double patterning , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.