PPSM: A Privacy-Preserving Stackelberg Mechanism: Privacy Guarantees for the Coordination of Sequential Electricity and Gas Markets

This paper introduces a differentially private mechanism to protect the information exchanged during the coordination of the sequential market-clearing of electricity and natural gas systems. The coordination between these sequential and interdependent markets represents a classic Stackelberg game and relies on the exchange of sensitive information between the system agents, including the supply and demand bids in each market or the characteristics of the systems. The paper is motivated by the observation that traditional differential privacy mechanisms are unsuitable for the problem of interest: The perturbation introduced by these mechanisms fundamentally changes the underlying optimization problem and even leads to unsatisfiable instances. To remedy such limitation, the paper introduces the Privacy-Preserving Stackelberg Mechanism (PPSM), a framework that enforces the notions of consistency and fidelity of the privacy-preserving information to the original problem objective. The PPSM has strong properties: It complies with the notion of differential privacy and ensures that the outcomes of the privacy-preserving coordination mechanisms are close-to-optimality for each agent. The fidelity property is analyzed by providing theoretical guarantees on the cost of privacy of PPSM and experimental results on several gas and electricity market benchmarks based on a real case study demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.

[1]  J. Lang,et al.  A Combined Equivalenced-Electric, Economic, and Market Representation of the Northeastern Power Coordinating Council U.S. Electric Power System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Optimality of the Laplace Mechanism in Differential Privacy , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Differentially Private Data Release through Multidimensional Partitioning , 2010, Secure Data Management.

[4]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets , 2012 .

[6]  Úlfar Erlingsson,et al.  Building a RAPPOR with the Unknown: Privacy-Preserving Learning of Associations and Data Dictionaries , 2015, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[7]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Constrained-Based Differential Privacy: Releasing Optimal Power Flow Benchmarks Privately - Releasing Optimal Power Flow Benchmarks Privately , 2018, CPAIOR.

[8]  Ninghui Li,et al.  PriView: practical differentially private release of marginal contingency tables , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[9]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems , 2012, CCS.

[10]  P. Van Hentenryck,et al.  Joint Electricity and Natural Gas Transmission Planning With Endogenous Market Feedbacks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  J. Cruz,et al.  On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero-sum games , 1973 .

[12]  Aaron Roth,et al.  The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy , 2014, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Zhao Yuan,et al.  Hierarchical coordination of TSO-DSO economic dispatch considering large-scale integration of distributed energy resources , 2017 .

[14]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[15]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Broadening the Scope of Differential Privacy Using Metrics , 2013, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[16]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation of Critical Infrastructure Networks , 2019, IJCAI.

[17]  Andrew McGregor,et al.  Optimizing linear counting queries under differential privacy , 2009, PODS.

[18]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Differential Privacy for Power Grid Obfuscation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[19]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Differentially private data release for data mining , 2011, KDD.

[20]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Selling privacy at auction , 2015, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  Ashwin Machanavajjhala,et al.  Principled Evaluation of Differentially Private Algorithms using DPBench , 2015, SIGMOD Conference.

[22]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Unlocking the Value of Privacy: Trading Aggregate Statistics over Private Correlated Data , 2018, KDD.

[23]  Sonja Wogrin,et al.  Retail Pricing: A Bilevel Program for PEV Aggregator Decisions Using Indirect Load Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Coordination of Interdependent Natural Gas and Electricity Infrastructures for Firming the Variability of Wind Energy in Stochastic Day-Ahead Scheduling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[25]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Optimal coupling of heat and electricity systems: A stochastic hierarchical approach , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS).

[26]  Ali Hassan,et al.  Energy Storage Siting and Sizing in Coordinated Distribution and Transmission Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[27]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  A Bid-Validity Mechanism for Sequential Heat and Electricity Market Clearing , 2019, ArXiv.

[28]  Adam D. Smith,et al.  The price of privately releasing contingency tables and the spectra of random matrices with correlated rows , 2010, STOC '10.

[29]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Dependable Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Stackelberg Game Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[30]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Towards fully renewable energy systems - Experience and trends in Denmark , 2017 .