Matrix‐rich and associated matrix‐poor sandstones: Avulsion splays in slope and basin‐floor strata

A common facies observed in deep‐water slope and especially basin‐floor rocks of the Neoproterozoic Windermere Supergroup (British Columbia, Canada) is structureless, coarse‐tail graded, medium‐grained to coarse‐grained sandstone with from 30% to >50% mud matrix content (i.e. matrix‐rich). Bed contacts are commonly sharp, flat and loaded. Matrix‐rich sandstone beds typically form laterally continuous units that are up to several metres thick and several tens to hundreds of metres wide, and commonly adjacent to units of comparatively matrix‐poor, scour‐based sandstone beds with large tabular mudstone and sandstone clasts. Matrix‐rich units are common in proximal basin‐floor (Upper Kaza Group) deposits, but occur also in more distal basin‐floor (Middle Kaza Group) and slope (Isaac Formation) deposits. Regardless of stratigraphic setting, matrix‐rich units typically are directly and abruptly overlain by architectural elements comprising matrix‐poor coarse sandstone (i.e. channels and splays). Despite a number of similarities with previously described matrix‐rich beds in the literature, for example slurry beds, linked debrites and co‐genetic turbidites, a number of important differences exist, including the stratal make‐up of individual beds (for example, the lack of a clean sandstone turbidite base) and their stratigraphic occurrence (present throughout base of slope and basin‐floor strata, but most common in proximal lobe deposits) and accordingly suggest a different mode of emplacement. The matrix‐rich, poorly sorted nature of the beds and the abundance and size of tabular clasts in laterally equivalent sandstones imply intense upstream scouring, most probably related to significant erosion by an energetic plane‐wall jet or within a submerged hydraulic jump. Rapid energy loss coupled with rapid charging of the flow with fine‐grained sediment probably changed the rheology of the flow and promoted deposition along the margins of the jet. Moreover, these distinctive matrix‐rich strata are interpreted to represent the energetic initiation of the local sedimentary system, most probably caused by a local upflow avulsion.

[1]  P. Talling.  Hybrid submarine flows comprising turbidity current and cohesive debris flow: Deposits, theoretical and experimental analyses, and generalized models , 2013 .

[2]  I. Kane,et al.  Submarine transitional flow deposits in the Paleogene Gulf of Mexico , 2012 .

[3]  Esther J. Sumner,et al.  Subaqueous sediment density flows: Depositional processes and deposit types , 2012 .

[4]  R. Arnott.  Turbidites, and the Case of the Missing Dunes , 2012 .

[5]  A. Pugin,et al.  An alternative model of producing topography in the crest region of deep-water levees , 2011 .

[6]  J. Best,et al.  Depositional processes, bedform development and hybrid bed formation in rapidly decelerated cohesive (mud–sand) sediment flows , 2011 .

[7]  R. Arnott,et al.  Stratal attributes and evolution of asymmetric inner- and outer-bend levee deposits associated with an ancient deep-water channel-levee complex within the Isaac Formation, southern Canada , 2011 .

[8]  R. Arnott,et al.  Stratal Architecture and Temporal Evolution of a Passive Margin Mass-Transport Deposit, Neoproterozoic Isaac Formation, Cariboo Mountains, British Columbia, Canada , 2011 .

[9]  R. Wynn,et al.  How Did Thin Submarine Debris Flows Carry Boulder-Sized Intraclasts for Remarkable Distances Across Low Gradients to the Far Reaches of the Mississippi Fan? , 2010 .

[10]  P. Haughton,et al.  Hybrid sediment gravity flow deposits – Classification, origin and significance , 2009 .

[11]  D. Hodgson.  Distribution and origin of hybrid beds in sand-rich submarine fans of the Tanqua depocentre, Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[12]  D. Jennette,et al.  Geometry and architectural associations of co-genetic debrite–turbidite beds in basin-margin strata, Carboniferous Ross Sandstone (Ireland): Applications to reservoirs located on the margins of structurally confined submarine fans , 2009 .

[13]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposits of flows transitional between turbidity current and debris flow , 2009 .

[14]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Turbulent characteristics of a shallow wall-bounded plane jet: experimental implications for river mouth hydrodynamics , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Jeff Peakall,et al.  A Phase Diagram for Turbulent, Transitional, and Laminar Clay Suspension Flows , 2009 .

[16]  Jeff Peakall,et al.  Mean Flow and Turbulence Structure of Sediment‐Laden Gravity Currents: New Insights using Ultrasonic Doppler Velocity Profiling , 2009 .

[17]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposit Structure and Processes of Sand Deposition from Decelerating Sediment Suspensions , 2008 .

[18]  J. Best,et al.  The dynamics of turbulent, transitional and laminar clay-laden flow over a fixed current ripple. , 2008 .

[19]  P. Haughton,et al.  Development of Rheological Heterogeneity in Clay-Rich High-Density Turbidity Currents: Aptian Britannia Sandstone Member, U.K. Continental Shelf , 2008 .

[20]  R. Schiebel,et al.  Onset of submarine debris flow deposition far from original giant landslide , 2007, Nature.

[21]  R. Arnott.  Stratal architecture and origin of lateral accretion deposits (LADs) and conterminuous inner-bank levee deposits in a base-of-slope sinuous channel, lower Isaac Formation (Neoproterozoic), East-Central British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[22]  R. Arnott,et al.  Anatomy and Evolution of a Slope Channel-Complex Set (Neoproterozoic Isaac Formation, Windermere Supergroup, Southern Canadian Cordillera): Implications for Reservoir Characterization , 2007 .

[23]  P. Talling,et al.  Anatomy of turbidites and linked debrites based on long distance (120 × 30 km) bed correlation, Marnoso Arenacea Formation, Northern Apennines, Italy , 2006 .

[24]  S. Leclair,et al.  Parallel Lamination Formed by High-Density Turbidity Currents , 2005 .

[25]  Z. Sylvester,et al.  Textural trends in turbidites and slurry beds from the Oligocene flysch of the East Carpathians, Romania , 2004 .

[26]  R. Wynn,et al.  Beds comprising debrite sandwiched within co‐genetic turbidite: origin and widespread occurrence in distal depositional environments , 2004 .

[27]  P. Haughton,et al.  ‘Linked’ debrites in sand‐rich turbidite systems – origin and significance , 2003 .

[28]  A. Palfrey,et al.  Facies of slurry‐flow deposits, Britannia Formation (Lower Cretaceous), North Sea: implications for flow evolution and deposit geometry , 2003 .

[29]  S. Leclair,et al.  Coarse-Tail Graded, Structureless Strata: Indicators of an Internal Hydraulic Jump , 2003 .

[30]  R. Wynn,et al.  Characterization and recognition of deep-water channel-lobe transition zones , 2002 .

[31]  G. Ross,et al.  Dextral strike-slip faulting in the Cariboo Mountains, British Columbia: a natural example of wrench tectonics in relation to Cordilleran tectonics , 2002 .

[32]  J. Best,et al.  Turbulence Modulation in Clay-Rich Sediment-Laden Flows and Some Implications for Sediment Deposition , 2002 .

[33]  J. Alexander,et al.  The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits , 2001 .

[34]  D. Lowe,et al.  Slurry‐flow deposits in the Britannia Formation (Lower Cretaceous), North Sea: a new perspective on the turbidity current and debris flow problem , 2000 .

[35]  D. Stow,et al.  Deep-water massive sands: nature, origin and hydrocarbon implications , 2000 .

[36]  Michael J. Branney,et al.  Sustained high‐density turbidity currents and the deposition of thick massive sands , 1995 .

[37]  H. Krouse,et al.  Neoproterozoic strata of the southern Canadian Cordillera and the isotopic evolution of seawater sulfate , 1995 .

[38]  Richard N. Hiscott,et al.  Loss of capacity, not competence, as the fundamental process governing deposition from turbidity currents , 1994 .

[39]  G. Ross.  Tectonic setting of the Windermere Supergroup revisited , 1991 .

[40]  B. Hand,et al.  Bedforms, primary structures and grain fabric in the presence of suspended sediment rain , 1989 .

[41]  D. Murphy.  Suprastructure/infrastructure transition, east-central Cariboo Mountains, British Columbia: geometry, kinematics and tectonic implications , 1987 .

[42]  C. Rees,et al.  Structural Transition and Stratigraphy in the Cariboo Mountains, British Columbia , 1983 .

[43]  D. Lowe.  Sediment Gravity Flows: II Depositional Models with Special Reference to the Deposits of High-Density Turbidity Currents , 1982 .

[44]  G. Middleton.  Subaqueous sediment transport and deposition by sediment gravity flows , 1976 .

[45]  E. Mountjoy,et al.  Geology of McBride map-area, British Columbia (93H) , 1972 .

[46]  Arnold H. Bouma,et al.  Sedimentology of some Flysch deposits : a graphic approach to facies interpretation , 1962 .

[47]  E. McKee,et al.  TERMINOLOGY FOR STRATIFICATION AND CROSS-STRATIFICATION IN SEDIMENTARY ROCKS , 1953 .