Does Tempo of Resistance Exercise Impact Training Volume?

Abstract Volume and intensity of exercise are the basic components of training loads, having a direct impact on adaptive patterns. Exercise volume during resistance training has been conventionally evaluated as a total number of repetitions performed in each set, regardless of the time and speed of performing individual exercises. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of varied tempos i.e. regular (REG) 2/0/2/0, medium (MED) 5/0/3/0 and slow (SLO) 6/0/4/0 during resistance exercise on training volume, based on the total number of performed repetitions (REPsum1-5) and time under tension (TUTsum1-5). Significant differences in TUT (s) were found in particular sets for each tempo of 2/0/2/0, 5/0/3/0 and 6/0/4/0 (p < 0.001). The ANOVA also revealed substantial differences in the REP for individual sets (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed that TUT for each set and total TUTsum1-5 were significantly higher in the 5/0/3/0 and 6/0/4/0 tempos compared to 2/0/2/0 (p < 0.001). REP was significantly higher for the 2/0/2/0 tempo compared to 5/0/3/0 and 6/0/4/0 tempo in each set. Total REPsum1-5, TUTsum1-5 between 5/0/3/0 and 6/0/4/0 tempos were not significantly different. The main finding of this study is that the movement tempo in strength training impacts training volume, both in terms of repetitions and total time under tension.

[1]  G. Hunter,et al.  Comparison of Metabolic and Heart Rate Responses to Super Slow Vs. Traditional Resistance Training , 2003, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  Frank E. Marino,et al.  Designing Resistance Training Programmes to Enhance Muscular Fitness , 2005, Sports medicine.

[3]  A. Fry,et al.  The Role of Resistance Exercise Intensity on Muscle Fibre Adaptations , 2004, Sports medicine.

[4]  P. Stastny,et al.  Optimizing post activation potentiation for explosive activities in competitive sports , 2016, Journal of human kinetics.

[5]  W. Reid,et al.  The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[6]  Justin W. L. Keogh,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Different Resistance Training Techniques in the Bench Press , 1999 .

[7]  K. Sugg,et al.  TGF-&bgr; Superfamily Signaling in Muscle and Tendon Adaptation to Resistance Exercise , 2015, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  Akihiro Sakamoto,et al.  EFFECT OF MOVEMENT VELOCITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAINING LOAD AND THE NUMBER OF REPETITIONS OF BENCH PRESS , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  J. Tufano,et al.  Physiological responses to different neuromuscular movement task during eccentric bench press. , 2018, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[10]  P. Stastny,et al.  A New Approach to EMG Analysis of Closed-Circuit Movements Such as the Flat Bench Press , 2018, Sports.

[11]  Jon E. Goodwin,et al.  EMG analysis and modelling of Flat Bench Press using artificial neural networks , 2016 .

[12]  W. Kraemer,et al.  Effects of Lifting Tempo on One Repetition Maximum and Hormonal Responses to a Bench Press Protocol , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  K. Häkkinen,et al.  THE IMPACT OF VELOCITY OF MOVEMENT ON PERFORMANCE FACTORS IN RESISTANCE EXERCISE , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  Stuart M Phillips,et al.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Jesper Augustsson,et al.  The Influence of Frequency, Intensity, Volume and Mode of Strength Training on Whole Muscle Cross-Sectional Area in Humans , 2007, Sports medicine.

[16]  R A Winett,et al.  Effects of regular and slow speed resistance training on muscle strength. , 2001, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[17]  H. Hoppeler,et al.  Chronic eccentric exercise: improvements in muscle strength can occur with little demand for oxygen. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[18]  B. Schoenfeld,et al.  Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[19]  Joshua G. A. Cashaback,et al.  Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  K. Häkkinen,et al.  Detraining Produces Minimal Changes in Physical Performance and Hormonal Variables in Recreationally Strength‐Trained Men , 2002, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[21]  Paul Keim,et al.  Do muscles function as adaptable locomotor springs? , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  P. D. di Prampero,et al.  The concept of lactate threshold. A short review. , 1995, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[23]  A. Knicker,et al.  High force development augments skeletal muscle signalling in resistance exercise modes equalized for time under tension , 2014, Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology.

[24]  J. Grgic,et al.  Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  M. Rennie,et al.  Enhanced amino acid sensitivity of myofibrillar protein synthesis persists for up to 24 h after resistance exercise in young men. , 2011, The Journal of nutrition.

[26]  B. Fernhall,et al.  Early‐Phase Adaptations of Traditional‐Speed vs. Superslow Resistance Training on Strength and Aerobic Capacity in Sedentary Individuals , 2001, Journal of strength and conditioning research.