COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING AND RESEARCHING PRONUNCIATION

Pronunciation, long on the periphery of applied linguistics research and pedagogy, continues to grow in importance because of its central roles in speech recognition, speech perception, and speaker identity. Pronunciation-related issues such as comprehensibility, accent, and the mutual intelligibility of varieties of world Englishes are central to many questions in applied linguistics. This calls for a sophisticated understanding of how technological tools that have long been used to shed light on phonological categories can be applied to teaching. Research into computer-assisted pronunciation teaching (CAPT) suggests that both researchers and pronunciation teachers increasingly make use of technology to answer key questions, to ensure that claims are defensible, and to develop theories and practices that more closely match acoustic reality. This article reviews three key areas where computer technology and pronunciation intersect: (1) appropriate pedagogical goals and the measurement of improvement; (2) the ability of CAPT to give useful, automatic feedback; and (3) the use of technology in diagnosing pronunciation errors. This article concludes with recommendations for key technological competencies needed by any researcher or teacher who examines pronunciation-related issues.

[1]  Janet Anderson-Hsieh.  Interpreting Visual Feedback on English Suprasegmentals in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Instruction , 1994 .

[2]  Ralf Kompe,et al.  Generating non-native pronunciation variants for lexicon adaptation , 2004, Speech Commun..

[3]  Farzad Ehsani,et al.  Speech Technology in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Strengths and Limitations of a New CALL Paradigm. , 1998 .

[4]  B. Cranen,et al.  An aid in language teaching: The visualisation of pitch , 1984 .

[5]  John M. Levis.  Changing Contexts and Shifting Paradigms in Pronunciation Teaching , 2005 .

[6]  A. Peter.  Teaching American English Pronunciation , 1991 .

[7]  Debra M. Hardison,et al.  Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings , 2004 .

[8]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Teaching the pronunciation of Japanese double-mora phonemes using speech recognition technology , 2000, Speech Commun..

[9]  John Burgess,et al.  Phonology and Pronunciation in Integrated Language Teaching and Teacher Education. , 2000 .

[10]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Second Language Accent and Pronunciation Teaching: A Research- Based Approach. , 2005 .

[11]  Rodolfo Delmonte,et al.  SLIM prosodic automatic tools for self-learning instruction , 2000, Speech Commun..

[12]  Mitch Weintraub,et al.  Automatic scoring of pronunciation quality , 2000, Speech Commun..

[13]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Feedback in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training: When technology meets pedagogy , 2002 .

[14]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  The Effects of Pronunciation Instruction on the Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity of L2 Accented Speech. , 2003 .

[15]  C. Lai,et al.  CALLING ON CALL: FROM THEORY AND RESEARCH TO NEW DIRECTIONS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING , 2008, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Automatic detection of frequent pronunciation errors made by L2-learners , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[17]  John M. Murphy.  Phonology Courses Offered by MATESOL Programs in the U.S , 1997 .

[18]  Lou Boves,et al.  Different aspects of expert pronunciation quality ratings and their relation to scores produced by speech recognition algorithms , 2000, Speech Commun..

[19]  Stephen G. Lambacher,et al.  A CALL Tool for Improving Second Language Acquisition of English Consonants by Japanese Learners. , 1999 .

[20]  Hong Kook Kim,et al.  Acoustic Model Adaptation Based on Pronunciation Variability Analysis for Non-Native Speech Recognition , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[21]  Gölge Seferoglu,et al.  Improving students' pronunciation through accent reduction software , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Vassilios Digalakis,et al.  Combination of machine scores for automatic grading of pronunciation quality , 2000, Speech Commun..

[23]  Rebecca Hincks,et al.  Measures and perceptions of liveliness in student oral presentation speech: A proposal for an automatic feedback mechanism , 2005 .

[24]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Reaching over the gap: A review of efforts to link human and automatic speech recognition research , 2007, Speech Commun..

[25]  Donald M. Lance,et al.  Pronunciation , 1885, Science.

[26]  John M. Levis,et al.  Teaching Intonation in Discourse Using Speech Visualization Technology. , 2004 .

[27]  In-Seok Kim,et al.  Automatic Speech Recognition: Reliability and Pedagogical Implications for Teaching Pronunciation , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Patti Price,et al.  VILTS: A Tale of Two Technologies , 1999 .

[29]  Garry Molholt.  Computer-Assisted Instruction in Pronunciation for Chinese Speakers of American English , 1988 .

[30]  Maxine Eskenazi,et al.  USING AUTOMATIC SPEECH PROCESSING FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE PRONUNCIATION TUTORING: SOME ISSUES AND A PROTOTYPE , 1999 .

[31]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners , 1995 .

[32]  Dirk Van Compernolle.  Recognizing speech of goats, wolves, sheep and ... non-natives , 2001, Speech Commun..

[33]  Murray J. Munro,et al.  Computer-Based Training for Learning English Vowel Contrasts. , 2004 .

[34]  John Field.  Intelligibility and the Listener: The Role of Lexical Stress , 2005 .

[35]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Feedback in computer assisted pronunciation training: technology push or demand pull? , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[36]  David Coniam.  Technology as an Awareness-raising Tool for Sensitising Teachers to Features of Stress and Rhythm in English , 2002 .

[37]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study , 2006 .

[38]  Helmer Strik,et al.  ASR corrective feedback on pronunciation: Does it really work? , 2006 .

[39]  Michael Carbonaro,et al.  Does Popular Speech Recognition Software Work with ESL Speech , 2000 .

[40]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Automatic Speech Recognition for second language learning: How and why it actually works , 2003 .

[41]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Selecting segmental errors in non-native Dutch for optimal pronunciation training , 2006 .

[42]  David Coniam,et al.  Voice Recognition Software Accuracy with Second Language Speakers of English. , 1999 .

[43]  D. Ladd.  The structure of intonational meaning , 1978 .

[44]  Yukari Hirata,et al.  Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training for Native English Speakers Learning Japanese Pitch and Durational Contrasts , 2004 .

[45]  J. Morely.  The Pronunciation Component in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. , 1991 .

[46]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Helmer Strik,et al.  ASR-based corrective feedback on pronunciation: does it really work? , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[48]  Helmer Strik,et al.  The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training , 2002 .

[49]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Computer-Aided Pronunciation Pedagogy: Promise, Limitations, Directions* , 1999 .

[50]  Dj Dik Hermes,et al.  Visual Display for the Teaching of Intonation , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[51]  Dorothy M. Chun.  SIGNAL ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR TEACHING DISCOURSE INTONATION , 1998 .

[52]  Steve J. Young,et al.  Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learning , 2000, Speech Commun..

[53]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Pronunciation Teaching Practices in Canada , 2001 .