Determination of fetal body volume measurement at term with magnetic resonance imaging: effect of various factors

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate various factors that potentially influence the fetal body volume (FBV) measurement using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to analyze whether the technique of measurement could be simplified. Materials and methods: In 20 singleton pregnancies scheduled for a planned delivery, FBV measurements were performed by two independent operators on sagittal, axial and coronal planes and with various slice thickness and intersection gap, totalizing 100 examinations. MR estimation of fetal weight (MR-EFW) was calculated based on the equation developed by Baker. The relative error of MR-EFW was calculated in function of birth weight (BW). Regression analysis was used to investigate the effect on the relative error of MR-EFW of different variables but also to investigate the effect on the measurement time of the FBV of various factors. Results: The mean relative error of MR-EFW was 1.96% and was significantly associated only with patient’s BMI but not with the type of MR sequence used or other variables. Type of MR sequence used and BW were significantly associated with the measurement time of FBV. Conclusion: Using MRI, the time for FBV measurement can be significantly reduced using thicker slices or intersection gap, with similar accuracy.

[1]  P. Mansfield,et al.  Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, The Lancet.

[2]  P Ryymin,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  A. Liao,et al.  [Ultrasonographic accuracy of fetal weight estimation and influence of maternal and fetal factors]. , 2011, Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia.

[4]  N Roberts,et al.  Estimation of fetal volume by magnetic resonance imaging and stereology. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  D. Levine.  Three-dimensional fetal MR imaging: will it fulfill its promise? , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  C. Barnewolt,et al.  Fetal lung volume measurements: determination with MR imaging--effect of various factors. , 2006, Radiology.

[8]  G. Marchal,et al.  Prenatal prediction of survival in isolated diaphragmatic hernia using observed to expected total fetal lung volume determined by magnetic resonance imaging based on either gestational age or fetal body volume , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  J. Wyatt,et al.  The neurodevelopmental outcome of term infants with different intrauterine growth characteristics. , 1999, Early human development.

[10]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Fetal body volume at MR imaging to quantify total fetal lung volume: normal ranges. , 2008, Radiology.

[11]  R. Tamura,et al.  Ultrasonic Prediction of Birth Weight in Preterm Fetuses: Which Formula Is Best? , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Twickler,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound in the estimation of birth weight at term. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  I. K. Rossavik.  The effect of maternal obesity on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  E. Baracat,et al.  Biópsia com agulha grossa guiada por ultrassonografia para o diagnóstico dos tumores fibroepiteliais da mama , 2011 .

[15]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Fetus and uteroplacental unit: fast MR imaging with three-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry--feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  N Roberts,et al.  Fetal and fetal organ volume estimations with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  G. Marchal,et al.  Fetal body volume: use at MR imaging to quantify relative lung volume in fetuses suspected of having pulmonary hypoplasia. , 2006, Radiology.

[19]  T. Farrell,et al.  The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation , 2002, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  J. Minogue,et al.  Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  A. Papageorgiou,et al.  Outcome of small-for-gestational age and appropriate-for-gestational age infants born before 27 weeks of gestation. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[22]  H. Hricak,et al.  Normal and hypoplastic fetal lungs: volumetric assessment with prenatal single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR imaging. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  B. Vohr,et al.  Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age. , 1993, The Journal of pediatrics.

[24]  Galán Sebastián Manzanares,et al.  Abnormal maternal body mass index and obstetric and neonatal outcome , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[25]  R. Schild,et al.  Gender-Specific Weight Estimation of Fetuses between 2,501 and 3,999 g – New Regression Formulae , 2008, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[26]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. , 1984, Radiology.