Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends

BackgroundPoint of care ultrasonography has been the focus of extensive research over the past few decades. Miniaturised, wireless systems have been envisaged for new application areas, such as capsule endoscopy, implantable ultrasound and wearable ultrasound. The hardware constraints of such small-scale systems are severe, and tradeoffs between power consumption, size, data bandwidth and cost must be carefully balanced.MethodsIn this work, two receiver architectures are proposed and compared to address these challenges. Both architectures uniquely combine low-rate sampling with synthetic aperture beamforming to reduce the data bandwidth and system complexity. The first architecture involves the use of quadrature sampling to minimise the signal bandwidth and computational load. Synthetic aperture beamforming (SAB) is carried out using a single-channel, pipelined protocol suitable for implementation on an FPGA/ASIC. The second architecture employs compressive sensing within the finite rate of innovation framework to further reduce the bandwidth. Low-rate signals are transmitted to a computational back-end (computer), which sequentially reconstructs each signal and carries out beamforming.ResultsBoth architectures were tested using a custom hardware front-end and synthetic aperture database to yield B-mode images. The normalised root-mean-squared-error between the quadrature SAB image and the RF reference image was $$13\%$$13% while the compressive SAB error was $$22\%$$22% for the same degree of spatial compounding. The sampling rate is reduced by a factor of 2 (quadrature SAB) and 4.7 (compressive SAB), compared to the RF sampling rate. The quadrature method is implemented on FPGA, with a total power consumption of $$4.1 $$4.1 mW, which is comparable to state-of-the-art hardware topologies, but with significantly reduced circuit area.ConclusionsThrough a novel combination of SAB and low-rate sampling techniques, the proposed architectures achieve a significant reduction in data transmission rate, system complexity and digital/analogue circuit area. This allows for aggressive miniaturisation of the imaging front-end in portable imaging applications.

[1]  Toby Xu,et al.  Single-chip CMUT-on-CMOS front-end system for real-time volumetric IVUS and ICE imaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[2]  Haim Azhari,et al.  Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers: Azhari/Ultrasound , 2010 .

[3]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging for small scale systems , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Martin O. Culjat,et al.  Wearable Ultrasound Array for Point-of-Care Imaging and Patient Monitoring , 2016, MMVR.

[5]  S.B. Park,et al.  Phase-error-free quadrature sampling technique in the ultrasonic B-scan imaging system and its application to the synthetic focusing system , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Gerard C. M. Meijer,et al.  A programmable analog delay line for Micro-beamforming in a transesophageal ultrasound probe , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology.

[7]  T. Blumensath,et al.  Theory and Applications , 2011 .

[8]  O. Oralkan,et al.  An endoscopic imaging system based on a two-dimensional CMUT array: real-time imaging results , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[9]  Kyusun Choi,et al.  CMOS Ultrasound Transceiver Chip for High-Resolution Ultrasonic Imaging Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[10]  Paul E. Hasler,et al.  An Analog Integrated Circuit Beamformer for High-Frequency Medical Ultrasound Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[11]  Jae Jin Lee,et al.  A System-on-Chip Solution for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Imaging Systems: Architecture and ASIC Implementation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[12]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Sampling signals with finite rate of innovation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  K. Ranganathan,et al.  Direct sampled I/Q beamforming for compact and very low-cost ultrasound imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Yangmo Yoo,et al.  A single FPGA-based portable ultrasound imaging system for point-of-care applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  P. Acevedo,et al.  Image Quality Improvement Performance Using the Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique Data , 2011 .

[16]  Chao Chen,et al.  A front-end ASIC with receive sub-array beamforming integrated with a 32 × 32 PZT matrix transducer for 3-D transesophageal echocardiography , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits (VLSI-Circuits).

[17]  H. Azhari.  Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers , 2010 .

[18]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[19]  Byungsub Kim,et al.  A Single-Chip 32-Channel Analog Beamformer With 4-ns Delay Resolution and 768-ns Maximum Delay Range for Ultrasound Medical Imaging With a Linear Array Transducer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[20]  Nico de Jong,et al.  A Front-End ASIC With Receive Sub-array Beamforming Integrated With a $32 \times 32$ PZT Matrix Transducer for 3-D Transesophageal Echocardiography , 2017, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[21]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Innovation Rate Sampling of Pulse Streams With Application to Ultrasound Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Paul Hasler,et al.  An analog beamformer for integrated high-frequency medical ultrasound imaging , 2011, 2011 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).