When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners

Abstract This paper explains the institutional logics of academia, and of practitioners within industry and government, as well as the alignment and misalignment that occurs when these actors collaborate. This is achieved by building on the theories on alignment and misalignment and institutional logics, whilst conducting an explorative case study of a circular economy cluster from the Tampere Region of Finland. This paper offers three main contributions: First, convergence and divergence of institutional logics by industry, government, and academic actors can lead to alignment and misalignment at three levels: actor-type, relationship, and system levels. Second, partial alignment and misalignment are found to be in-between modes of alignment, which challenges the idea that alignment and misalignment are dichotomous. Instead, alignment and misalignment should be seen as the two ends of a continuum. Third, alignment and misalignment are dynamic by nature, because institutional logics change and modify during collaboration. For practice, this paper gives advice on how collaboration between academia and practitioners can be advanced to achieve alignment and avoid misalignment.

[1]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[2]  David Soskice,et al.  An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[3]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[4]  Candace Jones,et al.  Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005 , 2010 .

[5]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[6]  Christina Öberg,et al.  Divergent and convergent logic of firms: Barriers and enablers for development and commercialization of innovations , 2014 .

[7]  Thomas Hoholm,et al.  Studying innovation processes in real-time: The promises and challenges of ethnography , 2011 .

[8]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care , 2000 .

[10]  Tommy Shih,et al.  State actors’ mobilisation of resources for innovation : a case study of a Chinese vaccine , 2016 .

[11]  Aino Halinen,et al.  Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks , 2005 .

[12]  E. Jaakkola,et al.  How to manage innovation processes in extensive networks: A longitudinal study , 2017 .

[13]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  Strategies of Multiple Triangulation , 2017 .

[14]  P. Ritala,et al.  Institutionalization Process of Service Innovation: Overcoming Competing Institutional Logics in Service Ecosystems , 2018, Handbook of Service Science, Volume II.

[15]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Firm-brand community value co-creation as alignment of practices , 2015 .

[17]  E. Baraldi,et al.  Controlling the commercialisation of science across inter-organisational borders: Four cases from two major Swedish universities , 2014 .

[18]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[19]  Sylvie Lacoste Sustainable value co-creation in business networks , 2016 .

[20]  A. Cox Business relationship alignment: on the commensurability of value capture and mutuality in buyer and supplier exchange , 2004 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[22]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[23]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Picture this: Managed change and resistance in business network settings , 2009 .

[24]  Daniela Corsaro,et al.  Alignment and Misalignment in Business Relationships , 2011 .

[25]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Sense and sensibility: Two approaches for using existing theory in theory-building qualitative research , 2010 .

[26]  Christopher J. Medlin,et al.  Time and process in business network research , 2012 .

[27]  Todd Saxton,et al.  The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics On Alliance Outcomes , 1997 .

[28]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[29]  K. Artto,et al.  New value creation in business networks: The role of collective action in constructing system-level goals , 2017 .

[30]  A. Varga,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Regional Innovation Systems , 2002 .

[31]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Collaboration as a pathway for sustainability , 2007 .

[32]  Enrico Baraldi,et al.  Controlling and combining resources in networks — from Uppsala to Stanford, and back again: The case of a biotech innovation , 2009 .

[33]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[34]  David E. Avison,et al.  Using and validating the strategic alignment model , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Amir Saman Kheirkhah,et al.  Fuzzy logic in manufacturing: A review of literature and a specialized application , 2011 .

[36]  Kevin Wilson,et al.  Assessing and strengthening internal alignment of new marketing units: An interpretative tool Original Research Article , 2013 .

[37]  L. Coote,et al.  Interfirm behavior and goal alignment in relational exchanges , 2007 .

[38]  Daniela Corsaro,et al.  Actors' Heterogeneity in Innovation Networks , 2012 .

[39]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[40]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  From the Critics' Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System , 2005 .

[41]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications , 2014 .

[42]  Heléne Lundberg,et al.  Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish context , 2012 .

[43]  Patricia H. Thornton The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics , 2002 .