Feedback In Voluntary Closing Arm Prostheses

High rejection rates indicate that prosthetic users are not satisfied with the performance of their arm prostheses. In theory, one of the advantages of shoulder controlled prosthesis, compared to myoelectric prostheses, is that the user receives direct proprioceptive feedback about the opening width and pinch force of his prosthetic hand. However, the operating forces that commercially available voluntary closing prostheses require are too high, which leads to discomfort and disturbs the direct proprioceptive feedback. The purpose of this study was to find an optimal operation force, at which the prosthetic user receives optimum force feedback during comfortable prosthesis operation. During experimental research, subjects were asked to reproduce a certain reference force, with and without a visual representation of the force produced. The subject’s performances of blind generated forces regarding the reproducibility, stability and repeatability were evaluated to find an optimal cable force. The performances of male and female subjects, as well as the performances of subjects with and without arm defects were compared. As a result the optimal operation force level is found between 20 and 30 N for male and female subjects without arm defects. No differences in stability and repeatability performance are found between subjects with and without an arm defects. However, subjects with arm defects are found to have difficulties reproducing high force levels. In line with this, the reproducibility optimum is found between 10 and 20 N for subjects with arm defects. It is concluded that of today’s commercially available arm prostheses only one is capable of creating pinch forces at the optimal cable activation force level of 20-30 N. The created pinch forces of this prosthesis are not sufficient to handle objects in daily life. Future prosthesis design should not exceed cable forces of 30 N when realizing the desired pinch forces for daily activities. Therefore transmission ratios or servo mechanisms might be needed to optimize prosthesis design.

[1]  J. Herder,et al.  Improving feedback in body powered protheses , 1995 .

[2]  David A. Abbink,et al.  A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Human Limbs and Their Substitutes , 1969 .

[4]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  H. Cotta [On the physiology of joints]. , 1966, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie.

[6]  Just L. Herder,et al.  Voluntary closing: A promising opening in hand prosthetics , 2003 .

[7]  Frans C T van der Helm,et al.  Sensory Weighting of Force and Position Feedback in Human Motor Control Tasks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 2000 .

[9]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[10]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Efficiency of Prosthetic Cable and Housing , 1995 .

[11]  Joseph A. Doeringer,et al.  Performance of above elbow body-powered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  D. H. Plettenburg Basic requirements for upper extremity prostheses: the WILMER approach , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[14]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: Method and theory , 1976 .

[15]  M LeBlanc Current evaluation of hydraulics to replace the cable force transmission system for body-powered upper-limb prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[16]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Electroactive polymeric sensors in hand prostheses: bending response of an ionic polymer metal composite. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[18]  H Monod,et al.  Contractility of muscle during prolonged static and repetitive dynamic activity. , 1985, Ergonomics.