Identifying Affordances for Modelling Second-Order Emergent Phenomena with the WIT Framework

We explore a means to understand second order emergent social phenomena (EP2), that is, phenomena that involve groups of agents who reason and decide, specifically, about actions – theirs or others’ – that may affect the social environment where they interact with other agents. We propose to model such phenomena as socio-cognitive technical systems that involve, on one hand, agents that are imbued with social rationality (thus socio-cognitive) and, on the other hand, a social space where they interact. For that modelling we rely on the WIT framework that defines such socio-cognitive technical systems as a trinity of aspects (the social phenomenon, the simulation model and the implementation of that model). In this paper we centre our attention on the use of affordances as a useful construct to model socio-cognitive technical systems. We use the example of reputation emergence to illustrate our proposal.

[1]  David-Hillel Ruben,et al.  The Existence of Social Entities , 1982 .

[2]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Electronic Institutions: The EI/EIDE Framework , 2016 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[4]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Modeling agents with a theory of mind: Theory-theory versus simulation theory , 2012, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[5]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  The design of intelligent socio-technical systems , 2012, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[6]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Emergent and Immergent Effects in Complex Social Systems , 2007, AAAI Fall Symposium: Emergent Agents and Socialities.

[7]  C. Castelfranchi Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: Cognitive Architecture and Contents for Social Structures and Interactions , 2005 .

[8]  Julian Padget,et al.  Formalizing a Language for Institutions and Norms , 2001, ATAL.

[9]  John R. Searle,et al.  What is an institution? , 2005, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[10]  Marina De Vos,et al.  InstAL: An Institutional Action Language , 2016 .

[11]  Julian Padget,et al.  Towards a Framework for Socio-Cognitive Technical Systems , 2014, COIN@AAMAS/PRICAI.

[12]  Harko Verhagen,et al.  Towards a Design Framework for Controlled Hybrid Social Games , 2013 .

[13]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems , 2016 .

[14]  Julian Padget,et al.  A Manifesto for Conscientious Design of Hybrid Online Social Systems , 2016, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[15]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[16]  M. Batty Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling , 2008 .

[17]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Beyond Accuracy. Reputation for Partner Selection with Lies and Retaliation , 2008, MABS.

[18]  R. Sun Desiderata for cognitive architectures , 2004 .

[19]  D. Dennett The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[20]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review , 2013, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[21]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Communicating open systems , 2012, Artif. Intell..