Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFlSTR Identifiler.

AIM To test the reliability, robustness, and reproducibility of short tandem repeat (STR) profiling of low template DNA (LT-DNA) when employing a defined set of testing and interpretation parameters. METHODS DNA from known donors was measured with a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that consistently detects less than 1 pg/microL of DNA within a factor of 0.3. Extracts were amplified in triplicate with AmpFlSTR Identifiler reagents under enhanced PCR conditions. Replicates were examined independently and alleles confirmed using a consensus approach. Considering observed stochastic effects inherent to LT-DNA samples, interpretation protocols were developed and their accuracy verified through examination of over 800 samples. RESULTS Amplification of 100 pg or less of DNA generated reproducible results with anticipated stochastic effects. Down to 25 pg of DNA, 92% or more of the expected alleles were consistently detected while lower amounts yielded concordant partial profiles. Although spurious alleles were sometimes observed within sample replicates, they did not repeat. To account for allelic dropout, interpretation guidelines were made especially stringent for determining homozygous alleles. Due to increased heterozygote imbalance, stutter filters were set conservatively and minor components of mixtures could not be resolved. Applying the resultant interpretation protocols, 100% accurate allelic assignments for over 107 non-probative casework samples, and subsequently 319 forensic casework samples, were generated. CONCLUSION Using the protocols and interpretation guidelines described here, LT-DNA testing is reliable and robust. Implementation of this method, or one that is suitably verified, in conjunction with an appropriate quality control program ensures that LT-DNA testing is suitable for forensic purposes.

[1]  Ate D Kloosterman,et al.  Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci. , 2003, Journal de la Societe de biologie.

[2]  M. C. Kline,et al.  NON-AMPLIFICATION OF A VWA ALLELE , 1998 .

[3]  Barbara Daniel,et al.  Recovery of DNA and fingerprints from touched documents. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  C. Strom,et al.  Use of nested PCR to identify charred human remains and minute amounts of blood. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  L. Saravo,et al.  Molecular analysis of genomic low copy number DNA extracted from laser-microdissected cells , 2006 .

[6]  A. Urquhart,et al.  DNA fingerprinting from single cells , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Eric Buel,et al.  Development of an Alu-based, real-time PCR method for quantitation of human DNA in forensic samples. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  S. Kwok,et al.  Avoiding false positives with PCR , 1989, Nature.

[9]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[10]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  P Gill,et al.  Application of low copy number DNA profiling. , 2001, Croatian medical journal.

[12]  Maximizing DNA profiling success from sub-optimal quantities of DNA: a staged approach. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  R Higuchi,et al.  Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. , 2013, BioTechniques.

[14]  Kathryn E. Dagnall,et al.  Comparison of the effects of sterilisation techniques on subsequent DNA profiling , 2007, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[15]  Mechthild Prinz,et al.  Optimization of a simple, automatable extraction method to recover sufficient DNA from low copy number DNA samples for generation of short tandem repeat profiles. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[16]  Jim Thomson,et al.  Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  J. Ballantyne,et al.  Whole genome amplification strategy for forensic genetic analysis using single or few cell equivalents of genomic DNA. , 2005, Analytical biochemistry.

[18]  J. Williams.  Basic cell culture : a practical approach , 2002 .

[19]  Mechthild Prinz,et al.  The Application of Ultraviolet Irradiation to Exogenous Sources of DNA in Plasticware and Water for the Amplification of Low Copy Number DNA , 2006, Journal of Forensic Sciences.

[20]  J. Ballantyne,et al.  Simplified Low‐Copy‐Number DNA Analysis by Post‐PCR Purification , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[21]  M. Carvalho,et al.  Low copy number: Interpretation of evidence results , 2006 .

[22]  R. Shaler,et al.  Maximization of STR DNA typing success for touched objects , 2006 .

[23]  Ray A Wickenheiser,et al.  Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  James Curran,et al.  LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[25]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[26]  W Parson,et al.  Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs--results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise. , 2006, Forensic science international.