Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

This topical review on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is provided with the intent of describing the state of the art in terms of technology, results from recent clinical studies, advanced applications, and ongoing efforts to develop multimodality imaging systems that include DBT. Particular emphasis is placed on clinical studies. The observations of increase in cancer detection rates, particularly for invasive cancers, and the reduction in false-positive rates with DBT in prospective trials indicate its benefit for breast cancer screening. Retrospective multireader multicase studies show either noninferiority or superiority of DBT compared with mammography. Methods to curtail radiation dose are of importance. (©) RSNA, 2015.

[1]  I Sechopoulos,et al.  Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. , 2015, Breast.

[2]  Oguzhan Alagoz,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts. , 2015, Radiology.

[3]  Madhavi Raghu,et al.  Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. , 2015, Radiology.

[4]  Yit Yoong Lim,et al.  The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[5]  Daniel F Heitjan,et al.  Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223. , 2014, Medical physics.

[7]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.

[8]  Stefania Montemezzi,et al.  Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Manuela Durando,et al.  Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2014, Anticancer research.

[10]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial. , 2014, Breast.

[11]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. , 2014, Radiology.

[13]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. , 2014, Radiology.

[15]  Pragya A. Dang,et al.  Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations. , 2014, Radiology.

[16]  A. Arieno,et al.  Preliminary Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications , 2013, Journal of clinical imaging science.

[17]  Madhavi Raghu,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. , 2013, Radiology.

[18]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis and the challenges of implementing an emerging breast cancer screening technology into clinical practice. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[19]  J. Cha,et al.  Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[20]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  A. Tagliafico,et al.  'In vivo' average glandular dose evaluation: one-to-one comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[22]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI , 2013, La radiologia medica.

[23]  D. Kopans Digital breast tomosynthesis: a better mammogram. , 2013, Radiology.

[24]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  S. Rose,et al.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  C. Balleyguier,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study , 2013, European Radiology.

[27]  P C Brennan,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging? , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[28]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis , 2013, European Radiology.

[29]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration , 2013, European Radiology.

[30]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[31]  Per Skaane,et al.  Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. , 2013, Breast.

[32]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[33]  D. Darambara,et al.  Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Takaaki Ito,et al.  A newly developed a-Se mammography flat panel detector with high-sensitivity and low image artifact , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[35]  T. Uematsu The emerging role of breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Breast Cancer.

[36]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  C. Waldherr,et al.  Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[39]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.

[40]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Breast Mass Characterization Using 3‐Dimensional Automated Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[41]  G. Bornet,et al.  Stereotactic Vacuum‐Assisted Biopsies on a Digital Breast 3D‐Tomosynthesis System , 2013, The breast journal.

[42]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. , 2013, Radiology.

[43]  E. Halpern,et al.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[44]  R. Edward Hendrick,et al.  Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography , 2013, European Radiology.

[45]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. , 2012, Medical physics.

[46]  C P Lawinski,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[47]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  A digital x-ray tomosynthesis coupled near infrared spectral tomography system for dual-modality breast imaging. , 2012, Optics express.

[48]  T. Kahn,et al.  Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis , 2012, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[49]  T M Svahn,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[50]  Unni Haakenaasen,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[51]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. , 2012, Radiology.

[52]  Federica Zanca,et al.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. , 2012, Radiology.

[53]  David Gur,et al.  Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[54]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach. , 2011, Medical physics.

[55]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. , 2012, Radiology.

[56]  Dominique Van de Sompel,et al.  Regularising limited view tomography using anatomical reference images and information theoretic similarity metrics , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[57]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences. , 2011, Medical physics.

[58]  Sara Gavenonis,et al.  Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2011, The breast journal.

[59]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[60]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: From mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[61]  A Tingberg,et al.  Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis--initial experiences. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[62]  Aili Bloomquist,et al.  Dependence of image quality on geometric factors in breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[63]  U. Bick,et al.  Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[64]  A. Badano,et al.  Oblique incidence effects in direct x-ray detectors: a first-order approximation using a physics-based analytical model. , 2011, Medical physics.

[65]  Howard C. Gifford,et al.  Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[66]  Christer Ullberg,et al.  Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[67]  David Gur,et al.  Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[68]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  On the frontline of screening for breast cancer. , 2011, Seminars in oncology.

[69]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[70]  D. Dance,et al.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[71]  E. Miller,et al.  Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[72]  S. Vecchio,et al.  A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images , 2011, European Radiology.

[73]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[74]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[75]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[76]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[77]  A. Badano,et al.  A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems. , 2010, Medical physics.

[78]  David Gur,et al.  Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[79]  I Andersson,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[80]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[81]  Stanislaw Majewski,et al.  Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis. , 2010, Radiology.

[82]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[83]  James G. Nagy,et al.  Numerical Algorithms for Polyenergetic Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[84]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[85]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[86]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[87]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. , 2009, Radiology.

[88]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[89]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[90]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[91]  P. Skaane Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[92]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[93]  Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results , 2009, European Radiology.

[94]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[95]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[96]  Edward F. Bullard,et al.  Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations. , 2008, Medical physics.

[97]  A. Karellas,et al.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. , 2008, Medical physics.

[98]  Carl J. D'Orsi,et al.  Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[99]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[100]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[101]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[102]  R A Schmidt,et al.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[103]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[104]  John M Boone,et al.  Classification of breast computed tomography data. , 2008, Medical physics.

[105]  J. Veltman,et al.  The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. , 2008, European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[106]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[107]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[108]  Ying Chen,et al.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications. , 2007, Medical physics.

[109]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[110]  Paul L Carson,et al.  Automated Ultrasound Scanning on a Dual‐Modality Breast Imaging System , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[111]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of detector operation and imaging geometry for breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[112]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  A new approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[113]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[114]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[115]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2006, Medical physics.

[116]  Yibin Zheng,et al.  Limited Angle Dual Modality Breast Imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[117]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[118]  Michael P. Kempston,et al.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[119]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Adaptation of Image Quality Using Various Filter Setups in the Filtered Backprojection Approach for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[120]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  High-speed large angle mammography tomosynthesis system , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[121]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[122]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Gaussian frequency blending algorithm with matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) and filtered back projection (FBP) for better digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[123]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[124]  L. Tabár,et al.  Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality from the Organised Service Screening with Mammography: 2. Validation with Alternative Analytic Methods , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[125]  Håkan Jonsson,et al.  Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality from Organized Service Screening with Mammography: 1. Further Confirmation with Extended Data , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[126]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[127]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .

[128]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[129]  Jessica W T Leung,et al.  Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. , 2005, Radiology.

[130]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[131]  Zhenxue Jing,et al.  Image performance of a new amorphous selenium flat panel x-ray detector designed for digital breast tomosynthesis , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[132]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[133]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized Detection of Mass Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Two- and Three Dimensional Radial Gradient Index Segmentation , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[134]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[135]  J.F. Krucker,et al.  Evaluation of thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[136]  A. Kapur,et al.  Combination of Digital Mammography with Semi-automated 3D Breast Ultrasound , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[137]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[138]  E. Miller,et al.  Tomographic optical breast imaging guided by three-dimensional mammography. , 2003, Applied optics.

[139]  David Gur,et al.  Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment. , 2003, Radiology.

[140]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[141]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[142]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[143]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[144]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[145]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[146]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[147]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[148]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[149]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[150]  L. Tabár,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.

[151]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[152]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography. , 1991, Medical physics.

[153]  Richard L. Webber,et al.  Restoration of Digital Multiplane Tomosynthesis by a Constrained Iteration Method , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[154]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[155]  B. G. Ziedses des Plantes,et al.  Eine Neue Methode Zur Differenzierung in der Rontgenographie (Planigraphies) , 1932 .