Comparison of parabolic filtration methods for 3D filtered back projection in pulsed EPR imaging.

Pulse electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (Pulse EPRI) is a robust method for noninvasively measuring local oxygen concentrations in vivo. For 3D tomographic EPRI, the most commonly used reconstruction algorithm is filtered back projection (FBP), in which the parabolic filtration process strongly influences image quality. In this work, we designed and compared 7 parabolic filtration methods to reconstruct both simulated and real phantoms. To evaluate these methods, we designed 3 error criteria and 1 spatial resolution criterion. It was determined that the 2 point derivative filtration method and the two-ramp-filter method have unavoidable negative effects resulting in diminished spatial resolution and increased artifacts respectively. For the noiseless phantom the rectangular-window parabolic filtration method and sinc-window parabolic filtration method were found to be optimal, providing high spatial resolution and small errors. In the presence of noise, the 3 point derivative method and Hamming-window parabolic filtration method resulted in the best compromise between low image noise and high spatial resolution. The 3 point derivative method is faster than Hamming-window parabolic filtration method, so we conclude that the 3 point derivative method is optimal for 3D FBP.

[1]  Gareth R Eaton,et al.  Comparison of maximum entropy and filtered back-projection methods to reconstruct rapid-scan EPR images. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[2]  S. Deans The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , 1983 .

[3]  Rizwan Ahmad,et al.  EPR oximetry in three spatial dimensions using sparse spin distribution. , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. 1997 : Print).

[4]  Howard J Halpern,et al.  Object dependent sweep width reduction with spectral-spatial EPR imaging. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[5]  Howard J Halpern,et al.  Simulation of 4D spectral-spatial EPR images. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[6]  Howard J Halpern,et al.  Comparison of local and global angular interpolation applied to spectral-spatial EPR image reconstruction. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  Howard J Halpern,et al.  Principal component analysis enhances SNR for dynamic electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of cycling hypoxia in vivo , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Douglas Faires,et al.  Numerical Analysis , 1981 .

[9]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Fourth Edition , 2022 .

[10]  Rizwan Ahmad,et al.  A parametric approach to spectral-spatial EPR imaging. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Howard J Halpern,et al.  Spatially uniform sampling in 4-D EPR spectral-spatial imaging. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[12]  Colin Mailer,et al.  Spin echo spectroscopic electron paramagnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Computer-Based Approach , 1997 .

[14]  Rizwan Ahmad,et al.  Enhanced resolution for EPR imaging by two-step deblurring. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[15]  H. Halpern,et al.  Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of a rabbit tumor using localized spin probe delivery. , 2010, Medical physics.

[16]  Colin Mailer,et al.  Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  Howard J. Halpern,et al.  Imaging radio frequency electron‐spin‐resonance spectrometer with high resolution and sensitivity for in vivo measurements , 1989 .