The Evaluation of Advice in Supportive Interactions: Facework and Contextual Factors.

Perceptions of advice in supportive interactions are known to be influenced by the threat advice poses to a recipient's face. However, research has given little attention to factors that may moderate the influence of face concerns on advice evaluations. This study examined how evaluator sex, target responsibility and effort, and advice content influenced evaluations of advice given bluntly, with aggravating facework, or with mitigating facework. Participants (N = 305) evaluated advice directed at a student depicted as upset about failing an exam. The student's responsibility and effort with regard to the failure was manipulated within scenarios. Facework was found to have a substantial main effect on evaluations of advice, with mitigating facework producing the most positive evaluations. This effect was moderated to varying degrees by each of the contextual factors examined.

[1]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Victims' perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom? , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[3]  Carlos G. Aleman,et al.  Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Revised Analysis of Face-Threatening Acts and Application to Seeking Compliance with Same-Sex Friends. , 1998 .

[4]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  The role of facework in younger and older adults’ evaluations of social support messages , 1999 .

[5]  Wendy Samter,et al.  Men's and Women's Evaluations of Communication Skills in Personal Relationships: When Sex Differences Make a Difference and when they don't , 1996 .

[6]  K. Karasawa.  The Effects of Onset and Offset Responsibility on Affects and Helping Judgments1 , 1991 .

[7]  Richard Bello,et al.  Interpretations of Messages: The Influence of Equivocation, Face Concerns, and Ego-Involvement. , 2001 .

[8]  Erina L. MacGeorge,et al.  The Impact of Politeness and Relationship on Perceived Quality of Advice about a Problem. , 2000 .

[9]  Brant R. Burleson,et al.  Assessing Explanations for Sex Differences in Emotional Support A Test of the Different Cultures and Skill Specialization Accounts , 1999 .

[10]  D. Goldsmith,et al.  Sex Differences and Similarities in the Communication of Social Support , 1997 .

[11]  T. Holtgraves.  Interpreting Questions and Replies: Effects of Face-Threat, Question Form, and Gender* , 1991 .

[12]  Developmental Changes in the Influence of Sex-Role Stereotypes on Person Perception. , 1984 .

[13]  B. Weiner.  Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct , 1995 .

[14]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[15]  Wendy Samter.  How gender and cognitive complexity influence the provision of emotional support: A study of indirect effects , 2002 .

[16]  Brant R. Burleson,et al.  The Impact of Situational Variables on Helpers' Perceptions of Comforting Messages , 1997 .

[17]  D. Goldsmith,et al.  Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat , 2000 .

[18]  Erina L. MacGeorge,et al.  Support providers' interaction goals: the influence of attributions and emotions , 2001 .