Mechanical analysis of circular liners with particular reference to composite supports. For example, liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets

Abstract This paper describes a methodology for the mechanical analysis of composite supports, such as liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets. The methodology presented here is based on an established technique of structural analysis commonly referred to as the ‘equivalent section’ approach. This technique consists in treating the composite section of a straight beam as a homogenized section of equivalent mechanical properties. The equations presented in this paper have been derived from application of the theory of elastic shells (or curved beams) and therefore are more appropriate for the analysis of circular tunnel liners. The proposed methodology for the design of liners is based on the construction of capacity diagrams, another established technique of structural analysis and concrete design that can be conveniently extended to the analysis of composite sections for tunnel liners. When applying the theory of elastic shells to derive the equations that conform to the proposed methodology, the problem of determining the mechanical response of semi-circular arches treated with the theory of thin and thick formulations has been re-visited. Observations of practical interest arising from the comparison of results obtained with both approaches are discussed.

[1]  T. Franzén SHOTCRETE FOR UNDERGROUND SUPPORT: A STATE-OF-THE-ART REPORT WITH FOCUS ON STEEL-FIBRE REINFORCEMENT , 1992 .

[2]  Kevin Hewison,et al.  Closing the circle? , 2004 .

[3]  E. Coddington An Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations , 1961 .

[4]  A. M. Muir Wood,et al.  The circular tunnel in elastic ground , 1975 .

[5]  C. Fairhurst,et al.  The elasto-plastic response of underground excavations in rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion , 1999 .

[6]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Rock tunneling with steel supports , 1946 .

[7]  A. Karakas Practical Rock Engineering , 2008 .

[8]  Fritz Leonhardt,et al.  Vorlesungen über Massivbau , 1973 .

[9]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .

[10]  Pierpaolo Oreste,et al.  A numerical approach to the hyperstatic reaction method for the dimensioning of tunnel supports , 2007 .

[11]  H. Einstein,et al.  SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS FOR TUNNEL SUPPORTS , 1979 .

[12]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Ground Response Curves for Rock Tunnels , 1983 .

[13]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Underground excavations in rock , 1980 .

[14]  C. Fairhurst,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE CONVERGENCE-CONFINEMENT METHOD OF TUNNEL DESIGN TO ROCK MASSES THAT SATISFY THE HOEK-BROWN FAILURE CRITERION , 2000 .

[15]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Rock Mechanics: For Underground Mining , 1985 .

[16]  T. D. O'Rourke Guidelines for Tunnel Lining Design , 1984 .

[17]  W. Flügge Stresses in Shells , 1960 .

[18]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Analytical Solutions for Shallow Tunnels in Saturated Ground , 2001 .

[19]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[20]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Fundamentals of rock mechanics , 1969 .

[21]  Pierpaolo Oreste,et al.  Analysis of structural interaction in tunnels using the covergence–confinement approach , 2003 .

[22]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[23]  Kurt H. Gerstle,et al.  Behavior of Concrete Under Biaxial Stresses , 1969 .

[24]  A. R. Forsyth Theory of Differential Equations , 1961 .

[25]  Karl S. Pister,et al.  FAILURE OF PLAIN CONCRETE UNDER COMBINED STRESS , 1957 .