Blackout mitigation assessment in power transmission systems

Electric power transmission systems are a key infrastructure and blackouts of these systems have major direct and indirect consequences on the economy and national security. Analysis of North American Electrical Reliability Council blackout data suggests the existence of blackout size distributions with power tails. This is an indication that blackout dynamics behave as a complex dynamical system. Here, we investigate how these complex system dynamics impact the assessment and mitigation of blackout risk. The mitigation of failures in complex systems needs to be approached with care. The mitigation efforts can move the system to a new dynamic equilibrium while remaining near criticality and preserving the power tails. Thus, while the absolute frequency of disruptions of all sizes may be reduced, the underlying forces can still cause the relative frequency of large disruptions to small disruptions to remain the same. Moreover, in some cases, efforts to mitigate small disruptions can even increase the frequency of large disruptions. This occurs because the large and small disruptions are not independent but are strongly coupled by the dynamics.

[1]  Drossel,et al.  Self-organized critical forest-fire model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[2]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[3]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Dynamics, criticality and self-organization in a model for blackouts in power transmission systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  E. Bonabeau How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality (copernicus) , 1997 .

[5]  J. L. Corwin,et al.  Impact assessment of the 1977 New York City blackout. Final report , 1978 .

[6]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Customer demand for service reliability: A synthesis of the outage costs literature: Final report , 1989 .

[7]  K. K. Kariuki,et al.  Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load , 1996 .

[8]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Evidence for self-organized criticality in electric power system blackouts , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Initial evidence for self-organized criticality in electric power system blackouts , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Examining criticality of blackouts in power system models with cascading events , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[12]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Evidence for self-organized criticality in a time series of electric power system blackouts , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[13]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[14]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Analysis of electric power system disturbance data , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality , 1998 .

[16]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[17]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Self-organized criticality , 1999 .

[18]  Ian Dobson,et al.  An initial model fo complex dynamics in electric power system blackouts , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  D. E. Newman,et al.  AN INITIAL COMPLEX SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF THE RISKS OF BLACKOUTS IN POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[20]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Modeling blackout dynamics in power transmission networks with simple structure , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[22]  R. Billinton,et al.  Comparison of Two Alternate Methods to Establish an Interrupted Energy Assessment Rate , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.