Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production

Abstract Languages are subject to phonotactic constraints—restrictions on sound sequences. An implicit learning paradigm examined whether participants could acquire constraints at two levels of representation through exposure to a set of syllables. Participants were exposed to categorical segment-level constraints (e.g., /f/ only in onset, /s/ only in coda) as well as gradient featural-level constraints (e.g., labiodental fricatives /v/ and /f/ occurred in onset position 75% of the time, coda 25%). Speech errors revealed that participants encoded constraints at both levels of representation. By biasing errors towards a single syllable position, segmental constraints strengthened the tendency of errors to preserve target syllable position (e.g., virtually no /s/ errors occurred in onset). In contrast, since the featural constraint allowed errors to occur in both syllable positions, encoding it weakened the tendency to preserve target syllable position (e.g., /f/ errors, influenced by featural as well as segmental constraints, surfaced in coda more often than /s/ errors surfaced in onset). Finally, participants in a second study failed to learn featural constraints for dorsal stop consonants. The implications of these results for the representation and processing of features are discussed.

[1]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[2]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Structural constraints in the perception of English stop‐sonorant clusters , 2001 .

[3]  Jeri J. Jaeger,et al.  Speech errors and the representation of tone in Mandarin Chinese , 1998, Phonology.

[4]  C. Romani,et al.  Syllabic Constraints in the Phonological Errors of an Aphasic Patient , 1998, Brain and Language.

[5]  G. Dell,et al.  Representation of serial order in speech: evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  S. Frisch,et al.  The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic , 2001 .

[7]  T. Hartley,et al.  A Linguistically Constrained Model of Short-Term Memory for Nonwords ☆ , 1996 .

[8]  John Coleman,et al.  Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability , 1997, SIGMORPHON@EACL.

[9]  G. Clements.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .

[10]  H. W. Dechert,et al.  Temporal variables in speech : studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler , 1980 .

[11]  V. Fromkin.  Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue , 1982 .

[12]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[13]  T. Berg,et al.  Redundant-feature coding in the mental lexicon , 1991 .

[14]  R. Treiman,et al.  The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters☆ , 1986 .

[15]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[16]  E. Söderpalm,et al.  Speech errors in normal and pathological speech , 1979 .

[17]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[18]  J. Stemberger.  Wordshape errors in language production , 1990, Cognition.

[19]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  The tongue slips into patterns , 1969 .

[20]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Similarity Avoidance and the OCP , 2004 .

[21]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[22]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[23]  D. G. MacKay.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[25]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[26]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Stefan Frisch,et al.  Against underspecification in speech errors , 1997 .

[28]  José E. García-Albea,et al.  Movement errors and levels of processing in sentence production , 1989 .

[29]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology: An Introduction , 1992 .

[30]  D. J. Guest,et al.  Phonetic Features in Language Production: An Experimental Examination of Phonetic Feature Errors , 2002 .

[31]  R A Mowrey,et al.  Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[33]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[34]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Joseph Paul Stemberger.  Phonological rule ordering in a model of language production , 1985 .

[36]  Harlan D. Harris,et al.  Holographic Reduced Representations for Oscillator Recall: A Model of Phonological Production , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[37]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[38]  Hassan R. Abd-El-Jawad,et al.  Slips of the tongue in Arabic and their theoretical implications , 1987 .

[39]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm , 2003 .

[40]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[41]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[42]  H. Gross.  Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand , 1983 .

[43]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The tongue slips into (recently learned) patterns , 2004 .

[45]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[46]  John Laver,et al.  Slips of the tongue as neuromuscular evidence for a model of speech production , 1980 .

[47]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Limited Use of Distinctive Features and Markedness in Speech Production: Evidence from Speech Error Data. , 1979 .

[49]  G. Dell,et al.  Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Similarity and phonotactics in Arabic , 1997 .

[51]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  41 Peggy Babcock'S Relatives , 1980 .

[53]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Consonant features in speech errors , 1980 .

[54]  David S. Touretzky,et al.  A Parallel Licensing Model of Normal Slips and Phonemic Paraphasias , 1997, Brain and Language.

[55]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  D. G. MacKay.  The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech , 1972 .

[57]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Asymmetries in the perception of speech production errors , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[58]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  Radical underspecification in language production , 1991, Phonology.