To Do or Not to Do: The Neural Signature of Self-Control

Voluntary action is fundamental to human existence. Recent research suggests that volition involves a specific network of brain activity, centered on the fronto-median cortex. An important but neglected aspect of intentional action involves the decision whether to act or not. This decision process is crucial in daily life because it allows us to form intentions without necessarily implementing them. In the present study, we investigate the neural correlates of intentionally inhibiting actions using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Our data show that a specific area of the fronto-median cortex is more strongly activated when people prepare manual actions but then intentionally cancel them, compared with when they prepare and then complete the same actions. Our results suggest that the human brain network for intentional action includes a control structure for self-initiated inhibition or withholding of intended actions. The mental control of action has an enduring scientific interest, linked to the philosophical concept of “free will.” Our results identify a candidate brain area that reflects the crucial decision to do or not to do.

[1]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition , 2006, Brain Research.

[2]  M. Brass,et al.  Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[5]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Neural correlates of frustration , 2005, Neuroreport.

[6]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Volition and Conflict in Human Medial Frontal Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[8]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Walton,et al.  Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  B. Libet Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness , 2004 .

[11]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. Passingham,et al.  Attention to Intention , 2004, Science.

[13]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Elliott,et al.  Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Ewald Moser,et al.  The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The Roles of Timing and Task Order during Task Switching , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Bjork,et al.  Two models of impulsivity: relationship to personality traits and psychopathology , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  L. Deecke,et al.  The Preparation and Execution of Self-Initiated and Externally-Triggered Movement: A Study of Event-Related fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. Petrides,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Revisited: Distinct Neural Circuits Participating in Different Stages of the Task Identified by Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  Robert W. Kentridge Review: The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness , 2000 .

[23]  R. Passingham,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  B. Feige,et al.  The Role of Higher-Order Motor Areas in Voluntary Movement as Revealed by High-Resolution EEG and fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[25]  Julie J. Exline,et al.  Virtue, personality, and social relations: self-control as the moral muscle. , 1999, Journal of personality.

[26]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  A. Damasio The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[29]  M. Jahanshahi,et al.  The mode of movement selection Movement-related cortical potentials prior to freely selected and repetitive movements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  C. Marsden,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation can influence the selection of motor programmes. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[35]  G. Goldberg Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  D. Pandya,et al.  Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses , 1985 .

[37]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[40]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .