Advances in Embodied Construction Grammar

Abstract This paper describes the continuing goals and present status of the ICSI/UC Berkeley efforts on Embodied Construction Grammar (ECG). ECG is semantics-based formalism grounded in cognitive linguistics. ECG is the most explicitly inter-disciplinary of the construction grammars with deep links to computation, neuroscience, and cognitive science. Work continues on core cognitive, computational, and linguistic issues, including aspects of the mind/body problem. Much of the recent emphasis has been on applications and on tools to facilitate new applications. Extensive documentation plus downloadable systems and grammars can be found at the ECG Homepage.1

[1]  B. Bergen Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning , 2012 .

[2]  Christopher R. Johnson,et al.  Background to Framenet , 2003 .

[3]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[4]  Jerome Feldman,et al.  Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[5]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[7]  Ellen Dodge A deep semantic corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis: A case study of metaphoric conceptualizations of poverty , 2016 .

[8]  Kelly Shen,et al.  Semantically-Driven Coreference Resolution with Embodied Construction Grammar , 2017, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[9]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Exploiting deep semantics and compositionality of natural language for Human-Robot-Interaction , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[10]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Application-Independent and Integration-Friendly Natural Language Understanding , 2016, GCAI.

[11]  Elise Stickles,et al.  Grammar Scaling: Leveraging FrameNet Data to Increase Embodied Construction Grammar Coverage , 2017, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[12]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  From Molecule to Metaphor - A Neural Theory of Language , 2006 .

[13]  John Bryant,et al.  A Best-Fit Approach to Productive Omission of Arguments , 2006 .

[14]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  The Winograd Schema Challenge , 2011, AAAI Spring Symposium: Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning.

[15]  Srinivas Narayanan,et al.  Moving Right Along: A Computational Model of Metaphoric Reasoning about Events , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  L0-The first five years of an automated language acquisition project , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[17]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Mysteries of Visual Experience , 2016, ArXiv.

[18]  Srinivas Narayanan,et al.  Reasoning About Actions in Narrative Understanding , 1999, IJCAI.

[19]  Shweta Narayan,et al.  Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar , 2004 .

[20]  Miriam R. L. Petruck Introduction to MetaNet , 2016 .