Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont

Soil erosion is influenced by factors such as soil properties, slope, ground cover, climatic conditions, and forest management activities, including skid trails. Skid trails typically represent 2% to 10% of a timber harvest's area; therefore, the potential to negatively affect site productivity and water quality as a result of harvesting is of concern. Soil erosion can reduce site nutrient reserves and increase sedimentation of nearby streams. Forestry best management practices (BMPs) are designed to provide effective techniques for maintaining environmental stability. Although BMPs are widely implemented, few data exist regarding the efficacy and costs of different BMP options for skid trail closure. The study objectives were to evaluate erosion control effectiveness and implementation costs of five overland skid trail closure techniques. The closure techniques were (1) waterbar only (Control), (2) waterbar plus seed (Seed), (3) waterbar plus seed and mulch (Mulch), (4) waterbar plus hardwood slash (Hardwood), and (5) waterbar plus pine slash (Pine). Each treatment was installed following harvesting and replicated on four trails to provide twenty experimental erosion plots. Geotextile sediment traps (Dirtbags) were used to filter skid trail sediment. Accumulated sediments were weighed monthly for one year, and erosion rates were determined for each treatment. Two commonly used erosion models, Universal Soil Loss Equation as modified for forests (USLE-Forest) and Water Erosion Prediction Project for Forest Roads (WEPP-Roads), were also applied to each treatment. Sediment collected from traps indicated that the Mulch treatment was the most effective for reducing erosion (3.29 Mg ha−1 y−1 [1.47 tn ac−1 yr−1]), followed by Hardwood (5.08 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.27 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Pine (5.40 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.41 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Seed (13.57 Mg ha−1 y−1 [6.06 tn ac−1 yr−1]), and Control (24.24 Mg ha−1 y−1 [10.82 tn ac−1 yr−1]). Overall, WEPP-Roads estimates were more similar to measured erosion than USLE-Forest estimates, but both models generally agreed with actual erosion trends. The Seed treatment was the least expensive beyond waterbars alone, but it was only moderately effective at limiting erosion. Incorporating slash dispersal and compaction onto overland skid trails during harvesting activities may be the best option for reducing BMP costs and long term soil stability on disturbed soils associated with log skidding.

[1]  M. Bolding,et al.  Stream Crossing Methods, Costs, and Closure Best Management Practices for Virginia Loggers , 2012 .

[2]  Joseph L. Conrad,et al.  Virginia Tech Forest Road and Bladed Skid Trail Cost Estimation Method , 2012 .

[3]  C. R. Wade,et al.  Comparing sediment trap data with the USLE-forest, RUSLE2, and WEPP-road erosion models for evaluation of bladed skid trail BMPs , 2012 .

[4]  M. Chad Bolding,et al.  Potential Soil Erosion following Skyline Yarding versus Tracked Skidding on Bladed Skid Trails in the Appalachian Region of Virginia , 2011 .

[5]  W. Aust,et al.  Operational forest stream crossings effects on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont , 2011 .

[6]  B. G. Lockaby,et al.  Research Gaps Related to Forest Management and Stream Sediment in the United States , 2011, Environmental management.

[7]  R. Feldt,et al.  Sediment trapping by streamside management zones of various widths after forest harvest and site preparation , 2010 .

[8]  Charles Robert Wade Evaluation of Best Management Practices for Bladed Skid Trail Erosion Control and Determination of Erosion Model Accuracy and Applicability , 2010 .

[9]  George G. Ice,et al.  Trends for forestry best management practices implementation. , 2010 .

[10]  Kristof Van Oost,et al.  The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling , 2010 .

[11]  Alan J. Franzluebbers,et al.  Principles of Soil Conservation and Management , 2010 .

[12]  Scott M. Barrett,et al.  Characteristics of Virginia's Logging Businesses in a Changing Timber Market , 2010 .

[13]  Baihua Fu,et al.  A review of surface erosion and sediment delivery models for unsealed roads , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  L. Macdonald,et al.  Frequency and characteristics of sediment delivery pathways from forest harvest units to streams , 2009 .

[15]  J. Edwards,et al.  Reducing Sediments from Skid Roads in West Virginia Using Fiber Mats , 2009 .

[16]  D. Lobb,et al.  Soil properties and productivity as affected by topsoil movement within an eroded landform. , 2009 .

[17]  S. Woods,et al.  Effectiveness of aerial seeding and straw mulch for reducing post-wildfire erosion, North-Western Montana, USA , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew W McBroom,et al.  Water quality effects of clearcut harvesting and forest fertilization with best management practices. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[19]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Application and Effectiveness of Forestry Best Management Practices in West Virginia , 2007 .

[20]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Persistence of road runoff generation in a logged catchment in Peninsular Malaysia , 2007 .

[21]  R. Visser,et al.  Methodology for evaluating post harvest erosion risk for the protection of water , 2007 .

[22]  Johanna M. Bell,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF TIMBER HARVEST PRACTICES FOR CONTROLLING SEDIMENT RELATED WATER QUALITY IMPACTS1 , 2006 .

[23]  L. Macdonald,et al.  Effectiveness of three post‐fire rehabilitation treatments in the Colorado Front Range , 2006 .

[24]  Changyou Sun Welfare effects of forestry best management practices in the United States , 2006 .

[25]  Gwyn Rees,et al.  Contribution from glaciers and snow cover to runoff from mountains in different climates , 2006 .

[26]  James P. Shepard,et al.  Water quality protection in bioenergy production: the US system of forestry Best Management Practices , 2006 .

[27]  David Pimentel,et al.  Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat , 2006 .

[28]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Use and cost of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and BMP-related sustainable forestry initiative guidelines to Arkansas timber producers , 2005 .

[29]  M. G. Ferrick,et al.  Quantifying the effect of a freeze–thaw cycle on soil erosion: laboratory experiments , 2005 .

[30]  Charles R. Blinn,et al.  Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: An overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002) , 2004 .

[31]  C. Jackson,et al.  CONCENTRATED FLOW BREAKTHROUGHS MOVING THROUGH SILVICULTURAL STREAMSIDE MANAGEMENT ZONES: SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT, USA 1 , 2004 .

[32]  G. Ice History of Innovative Best Management Practice Development and its Role in Addressing Water Quality Limited Waterbodies , 2004 .

[33]  Frederick W. Cubbage,et al.  Costs of forestry best management practices in the south: A review , 2004 .

[34]  Todd S. Fredericksen,et al.  Area disturbed and residual stand damage following logging in a Bolivian tropical forest , 2002 .

[35]  M. Madej Erosion and sediment delivery following removal of forest roads , 2001 .

[36]  J. Schuler,et al.  Assessing application and effectiveness of forestry best management practices in New York. , 2000 .

[37]  M. Barker,et al.  Soil disturbance and post-logging forest recovery on bulldozer paths in Sabah, Malaysia , 2000 .

[38]  David Pimentel,et al.  Ecology of Soil Erosion in Ecosystems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[39]  W. M. Aust,et al.  Forestry BMP implementation costs for Virginia , 1998 .

[40]  J. Quinton,et al.  The influence of vegetation species and plant properties on runoff and soil erosion: results from a rainfall simulation study in south east Spain , 1997 .

[41]  R. M. Shaffer,et al.  Evaluation of harvest planning training , 1997 .

[42]  Forest Roads in West Virginia, USA: Identifying Issues and Challenges , 1996 .

[43]  James A. Burger,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Forestry Best Management Practices in Virginia , 1996 .

[44]  T. Dillaha,et al.  Effectiveness of different approaches for controlling sediment and nutrient losses from eroded land , 1994 .

[45]  Frederick W. Cubbage,et al.  Costs of Protecting Water Quality During Harvesting on Private Forestlands in the Southeast , 1992 .

[46]  W. F. Watson,et al.  Intensive Utilization and its Economic Impact on Pine Plantation Establishment , 1992 .

[47]  C. W. Martin Soil Disturbance by Logging in New England̶Review and Management Recommendations , 1988 .

[48]  John D. McKenzie,et al.  Number Cruncher Statistical Systems (NCSS) , 1985 .

[49]  Patrick D. Miles,et al.  Protecting Water Quality in the Midwest: Impact on Timber Harvesting Costs , 1985 .

[50]  E. S. Corbett,et al.  Best management practices for controlling nonpoint-source pollution on forested watersheds , 1985 .

[51]  John J. Garland,et al.  Designated skid trails minimize soil compaction , 1983 .

[52]  Noel S. Yoho,et al.  Forest management and sediment production in the south - a review. , 1980 .

[53]  J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Area in Skidroads, Truck Roads, and Landings in the Central Appalachians , 1977 .

[54]  James H. Patric,et al.  Soil Erosion in the Eastern Forest , 1976 .

[55]  W. Megahan,et al.  Effects of Logging and Logging Roads on Erosion and Sediment Deposition from Steep Terrain , 1972 .

[56]  E. H. Toole,et al.  Temperature and Other Factors Affecting the Germination of Fescue Seed , 1939 .

[57]  H. H. Bennett The Problem of Soil Erosion in the United States , 1931 .

[58]  Weather Roulette,et al.  Climate , 1858, The Sanitary Review and Journal of Public Health.