Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language.

Early deafness in humans provides a unique opportunity to examine the perceptual consequences of altered sensory experience. In particular, visual perception in the deaf may be altered as a result of their auditory deprivation and/or because the deaf rely heavily upon a visual language (American Sign Language, or ASL, in the US). Recently, we found that deaf, but not hearing, subjects exhibit a right visual field/left hemisphere advantage on a low-level direction of motion task, a finding that has been attributed to the deaf's experience with ASL [Psychol. Sci. 10 (1999) 256; Brain Res. 405 (1987) 268]. In order to determine whether this visual field asymmetry generalizes to other low-level visual functions, in this study we measured contrast sensitivity in deaf and hearing subjects to moving stimuli over a range of speeds (0.125-64 degrees /s). We hypothesized that if ASL use drives differences between hearing and deaf subjects, such differences may occur over a restricted range of speeds most commonly found in ASL. In addition, we tested a third group, hearing native signers who learned ASL early from their deaf parents, to further assess whether potential differences between groups results from ASL use. These experiments reveal no overall differences in contrast sensitivity, nor differences in visual field asymmetries, across subject groups at any speed tested. Thus, differences previously observed between deaf and hearing subjects for discriminating the direction of moving stimuli do not generalize to contrast sensitivity for moving stimuli, a result that has implications for the neural level at which plastic changes occur in the visual system of deaf subjects.

[1]  K. Miller,et al.  Is the development of orientation selectivity instructed by activity? , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[2]  C. Shatz,et al.  Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits , 1996, Science.

[3]  J. Stiles-Davis,et al.  Spatial cognition : brain bases and development , 1988 .

[4]  M. Paré,et al.  Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects , 1998, Nature.

[5]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory spatial tuning of cortical neurons is sharpened in cats with early blindness. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Enhanced Facial Diserimination: Effects of Experience With American Sign Language , 1997 .

[8]  D. H. Kelly Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  D. Frost,et al.  Visual responses of neurons in somatosensory cortex of hamsters with experimentally induced retinal projections to somatosensory thalamus. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Hutton,et al.  Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for ASL signs and english words: Differences between imageable and abstract forms , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Do Deaf People See Better? Texture Segmentation and Visual Search Compensate in Adult but Not in Juvenile Subjects , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Auditory Localization in the Congenitally Blind , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults , 1983, Brain Research.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  M. Sur,et al.  Rewiring cortex: the role of patterned activity in development and plasticity of neocortical circuits. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[19]  E. Carlier,et al.  Enhancement of visual responses on the primary auditory cortex of the cat after an early destruction of cochlear receptors , 1977, Brain Research.

[20]  A W Roe,et al.  Visual projections routed to the auditory pathway in ferrets: receptive fields of visual neurons in primary auditory cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Karen R. Dobkins,et al.  Visual Field Asymmetries for Motion Processing in Deaf and Hearing Signers , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  M. Steiner,et al.  Increased regional cerebral blood flow in inferior occipital cortex and cerebellum of early blind humans , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Language, modality and the brain , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  H. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language , 1987, Brain Research.

[26]  M. Cynader,et al.  Abolition of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1976, Science.

[27]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language , 1996, Nature.

[28]  A J King,et al.  Improved auditory spatial acuity in visually deprived ferrets , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Wing Hong Lore,et al.  Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals , 1991 .

[30]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans , 1997, Nature.

[31]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Pattern and motion vision in cats with selective loss of cortical directional selectivity , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Mice Deficient in Cellular Glutathione Peroxidase Show Increased Vulnerability to Malonate, 3-Nitropropionic Acid, and 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-Tetrahydropyridine , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  David H. Peterzell,et al.  What covariance mechanisms underlie green/red equiluminance, luminance contrast sensitivity and chromatic (green/red) contrast sensitivity? , 2000, Vision Research.

[35]  D. Frost,et al.  Induction of functional retinal projections to the somatosensory system , 1985, Nature.

[36]  C Raphel,et al.  Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[38]  M Bross,et al.  Residual Sensory Capacities of the Deaf: A Signal Detection Analysis of a Visual Discrimination Task , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[39]  M. Sur,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity in cortical development: differentiation and specification of sensory neocortex , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[40]  Alessandra Angelucci,et al.  Induction of visual orientation modules in auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[41]  S. Levänen,et al.  Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult , 1998, Current Biology.

[42]  C Muchnik,et al.  Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. , 1991, Scandinavian audiology.

[43]  H. Poizner,et al.  Temporal processing in deaf signers , 1987, Brain and Language.

[44]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  F Rösler,et al.  Different cortical activation patterns in blind and sighted humans during encoding and transformation of haptic images. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[46]  H. Sauerwein,et al.  Signal Detection Analysis of Visual Flicker in Deaf and Hearing Individuals , 1980, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies , 1989, Vision Research.

[48]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers , 1993, Cognition.

[49]  Virginia Volterra,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for sign language , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[51]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory Localization Behaviour in Visually Deprived Cats , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[52]  M. Sur,et al.  Experimentally induced visual projections into auditory thalamus and cortex. , 1988, Science.

[53]  C. Mills Perception of visual temporal patterns by deaf and hearing adults , 1985 .

[54]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Mental rotation within linguistic and non-linguistic domains in users of American sign language , 1998, Cognition.

[55]  U. Bellugi,et al.  The linguistic basis of left hemisphere specialization. , 1992, Science.

[56]  F. Sengpiel,et al.  Influence of experience on orientation maps in cat visual cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  Reynolds Hn,et al.  Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects. , 1993 .

[58]  Karen R. Dobkins,et al.  Left-Hemisphere Dominance for Motion Processing in Deaf Signers , 1999 .

[59]  F Rösler,et al.  Topographic differences of slow event-related brain potentials in blind and sighted adult human subjects during haptic mental rotation. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Enhanced Image Generation Abilities in Deaf Signers: A Right Hemisphere Effect , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[61]  J. Rauschecker Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[62]  S. McCullough,et al.  Face processing by deaf ASL signers: evidence for expertise in distinguished local features. , 1997, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[63]  M. Hallett,et al.  Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects , 1996, Nature.

[64]  K. Dobkins,et al.  Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing , 2001, Vision Research.

[65]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory compensation for early blindness in cat cerebral cortex , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[66]  Edward L. Shaughnessy Abstracts , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[67]  M. Sur,et al.  Visual behaviour mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway , 2000, Nature.

[68]  M. Sur,et al.  A map of visual space induced in primary auditory cortex. , 1990, Science.

[69]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans , 1999, Nature.

[70]  CONCEPTUAL CROSS-MODAL TRANSFER IN DEAF AND HEARING CHILDREN , 1966 .

[71]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[72]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[73]  C. Schor A directional impairment of eye movement control in strabismus amblyopia. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[74]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Sensory mapping in a congenitally deaf subject: MEG and fRMI studies of cross‐modal non‐plasticity , 1997, Human brain mapping.