My neighbourhood, my country or my planet? The influence of multiple place attachments and climate change concern on social acceptance of energy infrastructure

Abstract Research on place attachments and identities has made an important contribution to understanding social acceptance of low carbon infrastructure, which are often objected to by local communities. However, a focus on local attachments predominates in studies to date, neglecting the potential role of national and global attachments and identities on energy beliefs and attitudes, despite the fact that large energy infrastructures are not only local in significance or function. To investigate this, survey data was collected from a representative sample of UK adults (N = 1519), capturing place attachments at local, national and global levels, climate change concern, beliefs about power lines and support for energy system change. Findings show significant differences in infrastructure beliefs and attitudes depending upon relative strength of attachments at different levels, controlling for personal characteristics. Analyses of variance revealed that individuals with stronger national than local or global attachments were less likely to support European grid integration; those with relatively stronger global attachment were most likely to support decentralised energy and those with relatively stronger local attachment were most likely to protest against a nearby power line. In addition, those with strong attachments at local, national and global levels were most willing to reduce energy demand, and those with weak attachments were least likely to trust grid companies. Relatively stronger global than national attachment was positively associated with support for decentralised energy, with this effect partially mediated by climate change concern. Explanations for the findings and implications for future research are discussed.

[1]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Social representations of electricity network technologies: exploring processes of anchoring and objectification through the use of visual research methods. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[2]  National and Local Attachments in a Changing World System: Evidence from an International Survey , 2005 .

[3]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Energy Colonialism and the Role of the Global in Local Responses to New Energy Infrastructures in the UK: A Critical and Exploratory Empirical Analysis , 2017 .

[4]  Gerd Blindheim Jacobsen,et al.  The role of (de-)essentialisation within siting conflicts: An interdisciplinary approach , 2015 .

[5]  M. Woods.  Contesting Rurality: Politics in the British Countryside , 2005 .

[6]  J. Barry,et al.  Environment and Social Theory , 1999 .

[7]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism , 2011 .

[8]  T. Cresswell,et al.  Place: A Short Introduction , 2012 .

[9]  Nick Eyre,et al.  Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy , 2013 .

[10]  Stephen Reysen,et al.  CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP: COMPARISON OF BULGARIA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES , 2012 .

[11]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study , 2011 .

[12]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[13]  L. Manzo,et al.  For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning , 2005 .

[14]  E. Feitelson.  Sharing the globe , 1991 .

[15]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines , 2013 .

[16]  Brigitte Nerlich,et al.  Human Responses to Climate Change: Social Representation, Identity and Socio-psychological Action , 2014 .

[17]  D. Bell,et al.  Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .

[18]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study , 2011 .

[19]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  PLACE ATTACHMENT AND PLACE IDENTITY IN NATIVES AND NON-NATIVES , 2007 .

[20]  M. Fried,et al.  CONTINUITIES AND DISCONTINUITIES OF PLACE , 2000 .

[21]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions , 2001 .

[22]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: the case of transmission lines , 2011 .

[23]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[24]  M. Lewicka.  In search of roots: Memory as enabler of place attachment , 2013 .

[25]  M. Gilmartin.  Border thinking: Rossport, Shell and the political geographies of a gas pipeline , 2009 .

[26]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review , 2007 .

[27]  Audrey Armour,et al.  The siting of locally unwanted land uses: Towards a cooperative approach , 1991 .

[28]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[29]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[30]  K. Koh,et al.  Being environmentally responsible: Cosmopolitan orientation predicts pro-environmental behaviors , 2015 .

[31]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. , 1978 .

[32]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Explaining public preferences for high voltage pylon designs: An empirical study of perceived fit in a rural landscape , 2013 .

[33]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[34]  Kate Burningham,et al.  An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents , 2015 .

[35]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[36]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line , 2013 .

[38]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Public beliefs about high-voltage powerlines in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A comparative survey , 2014 .

[39]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[40]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[41]  Cees J H Midden,et al.  The Role of Trust in the Affective Evaluation of Novel Risks: The Case of CO2 Storage , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[43]  Susan Clayton,et al.  Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition. , 2003 .

[44]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[45]  Claire Haggett.  Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms , 2008 .

[46]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[47]  B. Anderson,et al.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism , 1986 .

[48]  Thomas Priestley,et al.  RESIDENT PERCEPTIONS OF A NEARBY ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE , 1996 .

[49]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[50]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Uncommon ground: The role of different place attachments in explaining community renewable energy projects , 2017 .

[51]  P. O’Hare,et al.  “We're not NIMBYs!” Contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities , 2008 .

[52]  P. Gustafson.  MORE COSMOPOLITAN, NO LESS LOCAL , 2009 .

[53]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  From nuclear to renewable: Energy system transformation and public attitudes , 2012 .

[54]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[55]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[56]  J. Arnett.  The Process of Globalization : Regional Snapshots , 2002 .

[57]  P. Gustafson.  Place attachment in an age of mobility , 2014 .

[58]  Katrina Running.  World Citizenship and Concern for Global Warming: Building the Case for a Strong International Civil Society , 2013 .

[59]  Thomas A. Morton,et al.  Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change , 2015 .

[60]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK , 2010 .

[61]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .

[62]  Kristopher Velasco.  Human Rights INGOs, LGBT INGOs, and LGBT Policy Diffusion, 1991–2015 , 2018 .

[63]  H. Proshansky,et al.  Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self , 1983 .

[64]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  REMEMBERING PASTS AND REPRESENTING PLACES:THE CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL IDENTITIES IN IRELAND , 1997 .

[65]  J. Agnew,et al.  Place and Politics : The Geographical Mediation of State and Society , 1988 .

[66]  Peter Simmons,et al.  Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities , 2012 .

[67]  Maria Lewicka,et al.  On the Varieties of People’s Relationships With Places , 2011 .

[68]  Marit Vorkinn,et al.  Environmental Concern in a Local Context , 2001 .

[69]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[70]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best china': Symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case , 2009 .

[71]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[72]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions , 2015 .