The effect of managed hydropower peaking on the physical habitat, benthos and fish fauna in the River Bregenzerach in Austria

The lower reaches of the Bregenzerach, a river in western Austria, have been affected by heavy hydro-peaking discharges (up to 60 m3 s−1) for several decades. In conjunction with a plan to construct a new power plant, mitigation measures were developed to reduce the adverse effects of hydro-peaking in this river reach. The impact assessment examined the effects of a new flow management system introduced in 1992. The study concentrated on three main components: abiotics (morphology, hydrology, hydraulics), fish and benthic fauna. Prior to mitigation, both the fish and invertebrate fauna were heavily affected by the peaking. Benthic biomass was less than 15% of that predicted by an altitude model. After mitigation benthic biomass recovered to about 60% of the model prediction. No post-mitigation improvement was found with respect to fish biomass. Flow velocity distribution data showed that rising surge releases had two distinct phases, a bed-filling and a flow acceleration phase. The present flow management system, based on a dual-flow logistic, resulted in increased base flows and reduced peak flows, but did not alter the ramping rates. The reduction of the adverse effects of the bed-filling phase was apparently responsible for the recovery of the benthic fauna. However, the unaltered ramping rate of the acceleration phase may have inhibited the development of the fish community. An analysis of the hydrograph demonstrated the possibility of adjusting the present management strategy to reduce the ramping rate of the acceleration phase, smoothing out the peak duration curve.

[1]  DeLURY Db,et al.  On the estimation of biological populations. , 1947 .

[2]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  Speed and Stamina in Three Fish , 1960 .

[3]  R. Bainbridge Training, Speed and Stamina in Trout , 1962 .

[4]  S. Fisher,et al.  Differences in littoral fauna due to fluctuating water levels below a hydroelectric dam , 1972 .

[5]  J. Irvine,et al.  A preliminary investigation on effects of fluctuating flows on invertebrates of the Hawea River, a large regulated river in New Zealand , 1984 .

[6]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[7]  J. Heggenes Effects of Short-Term Flow Fluctuations on Displacement of, and Habitat Use by, Brown Trout in a Small Stream , 1988 .

[8]  B. Statzner,et al.  Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research , 1989 .

[9]  J. Gore,et al.  Seasonal variation in the composition of the drift below a peaking hydroelectric project , 1989 .

[10]  J. Gore,et al.  Instream flow predictions and management options for biota affected by peaking-power hydroelectric operations , 1989 .

[11]  O. Moog,et al.  Downstream Effects of Intermittent Power Generation , 1990 .

[12]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Effects of Flow Alteration on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities below the Brighton Hydroelectric Dam , 1991 .

[13]  Otto Moog,et al.  Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts , 1993 .

[14]  W. H. Burton,et al.  Enhancement of Fish Feeding and Growth after an Increase in Minimum Flow below the Conowingo Dam , 1993 .

[15]  James A. Gore,et al.  Near‐substrate hydraulic conditions under artificial floods from peaking hydropower operation: A preliminary analysis of disturbance intensity and duration , 1994 .

[16]  Piotr Parasiewicz,et al.  ESTIMATION OF PHYSICAL HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS USING AUTOMATION AND GEODESIC‐BASED SAMPLING , 1996 .