The Contribution of Family Culture to Political Participation, Political Outlook, and Its Reproduction

In a secondary analysis of data from a study of political socialization among Israeli teenagers, this article employs a modified and abbreviated version of Chaffee and McLeod's typology of family communications (FCP) to examine its relationship to political participation, political outlook, and the “reproduction” of parents' political outlook in their children. The findings confirm that the pluralist family is most likely to induce political participation, measured by media exposure, political knowledge, and conversation. Family communication pattern was also found to be associated with political outlook, measured in terms of hawkish-dovish orientations to the Arab-Israeli conflict, with a disproportionate number of dovish parents and children in the pluralist families. Nevertheless, the rate of reproduction of specific outlook does not vary significantly among the four types of family communication patterns, except for a suggestion in the data that families have a better chance of reproducing doves when they encourage their children to argue.

[1]  J. Proulx,et al.  Learning about politics. , 1979, The American journal of nursing.

[2]  D. Owen,et al.  Preadult Development of Political Tolerance1 , 1987 .

[3]  R. Bales,et al.  Family, socialization and interaction process , 1956 .

[4]  Civic Education in Ten Countries , 1978 .

[5]  Rivka Ribak,et al.  Democracy at Risk: The Reflection of Political Alienation in Attitudes Toward the Media , 1991 .

[6]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF SOCIALIZATION , 1967 .

[7]  J. Knutson.  Handbook of political psychology. , 1973 .

[8]  D. F. Roberts,et al.  Do the Mass Media Play a Role in Political Socialisation? , 1975 .

[9]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  FAMILY COMMUNICATION PATTERNS AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1986 .

[10]  R. Inglehart.  Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[11]  William M. Wentworth.  Context and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Socialization Theory , 1981 .

[12]  Tamar Liebes,et al.  Decoding television news: The political discourse of Israeli hawks and doves , 1992 .

[13]  Jack Dennis.  Socialization to politics: a reader , 1973 .

[14]  R. Connell.  POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION IN THE AMERICAN FAMILY: THE EVIDENCE RE-EXAMINED , 1972 .

[15]  R. Niemi,et al.  The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[16]  D. Baumrind,et al.  EFFECTS OF AUTHORITATIVE PARENTAL CONTROL ON CHILD BEHAVIOR , 1966 .

[17]  N. Cutler.  GENERATION, MATURATION, AND PARTY AFFILIATION: A COHORT ANALYSIS , 1969 .

[18]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[19]  Family Political Communication and Social Values , 1986 .

[20]  A. Arian,et al.  The Primarily Political Functions of the Left-Right Continuum , 1983 .

[21]  James Lull,et al.  Family Communication Patterns and the Social Uses of Television , 1980 .

[22]  F. Greenstein.  Children and Politics , 1970 .

[23]  G. Zellman.  Antidemocratic Beliefs: A Survey and Some Explanations , 1975 .

[24]  Roy L. Moore,et al.  The Role of Family Communication in Consumer Learning , 1981 .

[25]  The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. , 1969 .

[26]  A. R. Tims,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION PATTERNS , 1985 .

[27]  E. Fromm.  Escape to Freedom , 1941 .

[28]  K. Tedin.  The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[29]  M. Rokeach,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1960 .