Shell-shocked Diffusion Model for the Light Curve of SN 2006gy

We explore a simple model for the high luminosity of SN 2006gy involving photon diffusion of shock-deposited thermal energy. The distinguishing property of the model is that the large “stellar” radius of ∼160 AU required to prevent adiabatic losses is not the true stellar radius, but rather, it is the radius of an opaque, unbound circumstellar envelope, created when ∼10 M, was ejected in the decade before the supernova in an eruption analogous to that of h Carinae. The supernova light is produced primarily by diffusion of thermal energy following the passage of the blast wave through this shell. This model differs from traditional models of supernova debris interacting with an external circumstellar medium (CSM) in that here the shell is optically thick and the escape of radiation is delayed. We show that any model attempting to account for SN 2006gy’s huge luminosity with radiation emitted by ongoing CSM interaction fails for the following basic reason: the CSM density required to achieve the observed luminosity makes the same circumstellar envelope opaque ( ), forcing a thermal t 300 diffusion solution. In our model, the weaker CSM interaction giving rise to SN 2006gy’s characteristic Type IIn spectrum and soft X-rays is not linked to the power source of the visual continuum; instead, it arises after the blast wave breaks free from the opaque shell into the surrounding wind. While a simple diffusion model can explain the gross properties of the early light curve of SN 2006gy, it predicts that the light curve must plummet rapidly at late times, unless an additional power source is present. Subject headings: circumstellar matter — stars: evolution — supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)

[1]  Piero Madau,et al.  The Detectability of Pair-Production Supernovae at z 6 , 2005 .

[2]  Alexei V. Filippenko,et al.  Optical spectra of supernovae , 1997 .

[3]  The Type IIn supernova 1994W: evidence for the explosive ejection of a circumstellar envelope , 2004, astro-ph/0405369.

[4]  R. Chevalier,et al.  Emission from circumstellar interaction in normal Type II supernovae , 1994 .

[5]  Ryan Chornock,et al.  SN 2006gy: Discovery of the Most Luminous Supernova Ever Recorded, Powered by the Death of an Extremely Massive Star like η Carinae , 2006, astro-ph/0612617.

[6]  Robert D. Gehrz,et al.  Mass and Kinetic Energy of the Homunculus Nebula around η Carinae , 2003 .

[7]  J. R. Bond,et al.  The Evolution and fate of Very Massive Objects , 1984 .

[8]  D. Arnett,et al.  A Theoretical Model for Type II Supernovae , 1973 .

[9]  D. Arnett,et al.  Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis , 1996 .

[10]  Robert D. Gehrz,et al.  The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant Vy Canis Majoris , 2001 .

[11]  G. Smadja,et al.  Nearby Supernova Factory Observations of SN 2005gj: Another Type Ia Supernova in a Massive Circumstellar Envelope , 2006, astro-ph/0606499.

[12]  W. Arnett Type I supernovae. I. Analytic solutions for the early part of the light curve , 1982 .

[13]  David Arnett,et al.  Radiation Dynamics, Envelope Ejection, and Supernova Light Curves , 1977 .

[14]  Z. Barkat,et al.  DYNAMICS OF SUPERNOVA EXPLOSION RESULTING FROM PAIR FORMATION. , 1967 .

[15]  G. Shaviv,et al.  INSTABILITIES IN HIGHLY EVOLVED STELLAR MODELS. , 1967 .

[16]  S. E. Woosley,et al.  The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III , 2002 .

[17]  Kevin Krisciunas,et al.  An asymptotic-giant-branch star in the progenitor system of a type Ia supernova , 2003, Nature.

[18]  Robert M. Quimby,et al.  SN 2005ap: A Most Brilliant Explosion , 2007, 0709.0302.

[19]  S. Owocki,et al.  On the Role of Continuum-driven Eruptions in the Evolution of Very Massive Stars and Population III Stars , 2006, astro-ph/0606174.

[20]  R. McCray,et al.  Supernova 1987A : 20 years after : Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters : Aspen, Colorado, 19-23 February 2007 , 2007 .