Student justice perceptions following assignment feedback

In higher education, students are exposed to regular feedback about their performance, and a prominent aspect of students’ attention to feedback concerns the extent to which grades are consistent with what a student has expected to receive. Any discrepancies that arise can result in negative justice perceptions, which research has shown are associated with negative cognitive, emotional and behavioral consequences. However the extent of, and consequences of, these negative justice perceptions within the learning process have gone largely unexplored. This study investigates the relationship between expectation/performance discrepancies, justice perceptions, student satisfaction and self‐efficacy. In particular, we found an interaction between the grade received and negative justice perceptions; poor performers with negative justice perceptions were more likely to have lower subsequent self‐efficacy and satisfaction than those who did not have injustice perceptions. However, self‐efficacy rose for those who had negative justice perceptions if they also received moderate to high performance feedback. The results reflect the complexity of cognitive and behavioral responses to performance feedback. Implications for grading and recommendations for reducing injustice perceptions are discussed.

[1]  N. Frank,et al.  Academic Performance and Perceived Validity of Grades: An Additional Case for Self-Enhancement , 2000, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  Jeffrey Cinnamond,et al.  Coming of age in New Jersey : college and American culture , 1990 .

[3]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[4]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[5]  J. Lyden,et al.  Anchoring, attributions, and self-efficacy: An examination of interactions , 2002 .

[6]  Charles J. G. Griffin,et al.  The Meaning of Grades based on Faculty and Student Metaphors. , 1995 .

[7]  J. Forgas On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. Brockner,et al.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[10]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[11]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Responses to Successful and Unsuccessful Performance: The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Performance and Attributions , 1995 .

[12]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Role of causal attributions in dynamic self-regulation and goal processes. , 1994 .

[13]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[14]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[15]  D. G. Morrison,et al.  Do We Really Need Multiple-Item Measures in Service Research? , 2001 .

[16]  Rebecca M. Chory-Assad Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression , 2002 .

[17]  James H. Dulebohn,et al.  PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK EFFECTS IN TRAINING: THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED CONTROLLABILITY , 1994 .

[18]  Ross B. MacDonald Developmental Students' Processing of Teacher Feedback in Composition Instruction. , 1991 .

[19]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  Melanie Moore,et al.  Tenure Status and Grading Practices , 1998 .

[21]  Jane Strobino,et al.  Student Perceptions of Grades: A Systems Perspective. (the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) , 2002 .

[22]  Arnaud Durand,et al.  The Academic Ethic and College Grades: Does Hard Work Help Students to , 2000 .

[23]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[24]  William T. Ross,et al.  The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions , 1998 .

[25]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[26]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  A social-cognitive, attributional model of personal goals: An empirical evaluation , 1992 .

[27]  J. Tata GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS, GRADING PROCEDURES, AND STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF INSTRUCTORS : A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE , 1999 .

[28]  Karen K. Waner,et al.  Student and Instructor Use of Comments on Business Communication Papers , 1996 .

[29]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[30]  Jeffrey B. Adams What Makes the Grade? Faculty and Student Perceptions , 2005 .

[31]  Michael Moffatt,et al.  Coming of Age in New Jersey: College and American Culture , 1989 .

[32]  Brenda S. Sonner,et al.  A is for “Adjunct”: Examining Grade Inflation in Higher Education , 2000 .

[33]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Efficacy-Performance Spirals: An Empirical Test , 2000 .

[34]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Steve Williams,et al.  The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Performance , 1999 .

[36]  A. Baumgardner,et al.  If at First You Don't Succeed, What Makes You Try,Try Again? Effects of Implicit Theories and Ability Feedback in a Performance-Oriented Climate , 2003 .

[37]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. , 1994 .

[38]  D. Skarlicki,et al.  The Relationship Between Perceptions of Fairness and Voluntary Turnover Among Retail Employees1 , 2003 .