Biological interactions in fish stocks: models and reality

Three types of biological interactions; predation, competition and cannibalism are discussed in the context of marine ecosystems. Their effects on stock dynamics are considered and the empirical evidence for biological interactions reviewed. The main predictions from various population models which include some of these interactions are discussed and compared to empirical observations of stock dynamics, in order to see how well the predictions accord with observations. Although some limited evidence exists, showing that interactions - predation in particular - can be important, the fact remains that due to the high level of noise in data from marine ecosystems as well as the confounding effects of environmental varibility, it has proved difficult to find evidence demonstrating conclusively that biological interactions play a significant role in regulating stock dynamics. The purpose of large- scale multispecies models incorporating biological interactions is discussed, a range of such models for boreal ecosystems is reviewed and the necessary and desirable features which such models should have are given.

[1]  Gunnar Stefánsson,et al.  Utilization of the Icelandic Cod Stock in a Multispecies Context , 1997, Marine Resource Economics.

[2]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Chaos in three species food chains , 1994 .

[3]  I. Pokrovskaya,et al.  The Barents Sea , 2000 .

[4]  K. Magnússon,et al.  Destabilizing effect of cannibalism on a structured predator-prey system. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  J. Korrûbel An age-structured simulation model to investigate species replacement between pilchard and anchovy populations in the southern Benguela , 1992 .

[6]  J. Giske,et al.  Ecological Modelling for Fisheries , 1998 .

[7]  W. Ebenhöh,et al.  The stabilizing role of cannibalism in a predator-prey system , 1995 .

[8]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  “Stockfish”, a Multispecies Model for Stochastic Analysis , 1998 .

[9]  Bjarte Bogstad,et al.  A Multi-species Model for Fish and Marine Mammals in the Barents Sea , 1997 .

[10]  N. Daan A review of replacement of depleted stocks by other species and the mechanisms underlying such replacement , 1980 .

[11]  J. Balchen,et al.  A Multidimensional Continuum Model of Fish Population Dynamics and Behaviour: Application to the Barents Sea Capelin (Mallotus Villosus) , 1982 .

[12]  Øyvind Ulltang,et al.  Stock assessment and biological knowledge: can prediction uncertainty be reduced? , 1996 .

[13]  Wilfried Gabriel,et al.  Cannibalism as a life boat mechanism , 1988 .

[14]  B. E. Skud Dominance in Fishes: The Relation Between Environment and Abundance , 1982, Science.

[15]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[16]  D. A. Dwyer,et al.  Feeding Habits and Daily Ration of Walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) in the Eastern Bering Sea, with Special Reference to Cannibalism , 1987 .

[17]  A. Barkai,et al.  Biological interactions: causes or effects of variability in the Benguela ecosystem? , 1987 .

[18]  Sigbjørn Mehl,et al.  Cannibalism and year-class strength in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) in Arcto-boreal ecosystems (Barents Sea, Iceland, and eastern Newfoundland) , 1994 .

[19]  Robert M. May,et al.  Limit Cycles in Predator-Prey Communities , 1972, Science.

[20]  K. L. Seip Defining and measuring species interactions in aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[21]  Einar Hatlebakk,et al.  System Model (Systmod) for the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea , 1998 .

[22]  U. Skúladóttir,et al.  Aspects of the ecology of a Boreal system , 1998 .