An analysis of OWL-based semantic mediation approaches to enhance manufacturing service capability models

The exchange of accurate, computer-interpretable information is critical in today’s dynamic supply chains in which manufacturers come and go as needed. This exchange begins when manufacturers, who hope to join the supply chain, provide the OEM (original equipment manufacturer) with information regarding their production capabilities. These capabilities are represented electronically in what are called manufacturing service capability (MSC) models. These models are frequently proprietary, which makes them difficult to access, and imprecise, which makes them difficult to use. Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a powerful language for capturing the semantics of such models. OWL can enhance both precision and accessibility, but it requires semantic mediation to resolve semantic conflicts and more importantly to enhance model semantics. Semantic-mediation approaches can generally be classified into two approaches mapping-based and reference-ontology-based. This paper characterises and compares the two approaches. Characterisation is based on examples of proprietary MSC models and by deployment criteria including mediation quality, scalability, evolution, and knowledge organisation. Comparison is based on the behaviours and trade-offs of the two approaches in the context of these deployment criteria. The paper also provides a decision-making template associated with these criteria. Finally, the paper uses this template to show under what conditions each mediation technique is preferred.

[1]  Satya S. Sahoo,et al.  A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF , 2009 .

[2]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  An Ontology for Representation of Fixture Design Knowledge , 2008 .

[3]  Dean Allemang,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist - Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Second Edition , 2011 .

[4]  DogacAsuman,et al.  Artemis message exchange framework , 2005 .

[5]  Parag Vichare,et al.  A Unified Manufacturing Resource Model for representing CNC machining systems , 2009 .

[6]  Dong Yang,et al.  An ontology-based architecture for implementing semantic integration of supply chain management , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[7]  Hyunbo Cho,et al.  Discovering and integrating distributed manufacturing services with semantic manufacturing capability profiles , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[8]  Yildiray Kabak,et al.  Artemis message exchange framework: semantic interoperability of exchanged messages in the healthcare domain , 2005, SGMD.

[9]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[10]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems , 1994, TODS.

[11]  S. S. Rao,et al.  SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY FLEXIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2010 .

[12]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  Ontology Reconciliation , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[13]  Hyunbo Cho,et al.  A semantic web service framework to support intelligent distributed manufacturing , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst..

[14]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Infomaster: an information integration system , 1997, SIGMOD '97.

[15]  Jérôme David,et al.  Detection and Transformation of Ontology Patterns , 2009, IC3K.

[16]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources , 1999, SGMD.

[17]  LAKS V.S. LAKSHMANAN,et al.  Logic and Algebraic Languages for Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems , 1997, J. Log. Program..

[18]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Information systems interoperability: What lies beneath? , 2004, TOIS.

[19]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems Based on Interoperation Across Pre-Existing Ontologies , 2000, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[20]  Dejing Dou,et al.  Ontology translation by ontology merging and automated reasoning , 2004 .

[21]  Stephen Hayne,et al.  Multi-user view integration system (MUVIS): an expert system for view integration , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. Sixth International Conference on Data Engineering.

[22]  N. Suresh,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility , 2012 .

[23]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language , 2009 .

[24]  Boris Motik,et al.  MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[25]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  MedMaker: a mediation system based on declarative specifications , 1996, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Data Engineering.

[26]  Vojtěch Svátek,et al.  OWL Matching Patterns Backed by Naming and Ontology Patterns , 2011 .

[27]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies , 2000, KR.

[28]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  An Analysis of Ontology Mismatches; Heterogeneity versus Interoperability , 2007 .

[29]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  A Two-Layered Integration Approach for Product Information in B2B E-commerce , 2001, EC-Web.

[31]  Bodo Rieger,et al.  Semantic Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources , 2000, EFIS.

[32]  James A. Larson,et al.  Integrating User Views in Database Design , 1986, Computer.

[33]  Boonserm Kulvatunyou,et al.  A semantic-mediation architecture for interoperable supply-chain applications , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[34]  Ravi Krishnamurthy,et al.  Language features for interoperability of databases with schematic discrepancies , 1991, SIGMOD '91.

[35]  Farhad Ameri,et al.  An Upper Ontology for Manufacturing Service Description , 2006 .

[36]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[37]  Asuman Dogac,et al.  A Semantic-Based Solution for UBL Schema Interoperability , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[38]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management , 2015, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[39]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  So Far (Schematically) yet So Near (Semantically) , 1992, DS-5.

[40]  Grigoris Antoniou,et al.  Ontology change: classification and survey , 2008, The Knowledge Engineering Review.