Effect of total cementitious content on shear strength of high-volume fly ash concrete beams

Abstract The production of portland cement – the key ingredient in concrete – generates a significant amount of carbon dioxide. However, due to its incredible versatility, availability, and relatively low cost, concrete is the most consumed manmade material on the planet. One method of reducing concrete’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is the use of fly ash to replace a significant amount of the cement. This paper compares two experimental studies that were conducted to investigate the shear strength of full-scale beams constructed with high-volume fly ash concrete (HVFAC) – concrete with at least 50% of the cement replaced with fly ash. The primary difference between the two studies involved the amount of cementitious material, with one mix having a relatively high total cementitious content (502 kg/m 3 ) and the other mix having a relatively low total cementitious content (337 kg/m 3 ). Both mixes utilized a 70% replacement of portland cement with a Class C fly ash. Each of these experimental programs consisted of eight beams (six without shear reinforcing and two with shear reinforcing in the form of stirrups) with three different longitudinal reinforcement ratios. The beams were tested under a simply supported four-point loading condition. The experimental shear strengths of the beams were compared with both the shear provisions of selected standards (US, Australia, Canada, Europe, and Japan) and a shear database of conventional concrete (CC) specimens. Furthermore, statistical data analyses (both parametric and nonparametric) were performed to evaluate whether or not there is any statistically significant difference between the shear strength of both mixes. Results of these statistical tests show there is no significant difference between the shear strength of these two HVFAC mixes for the beams tested in this investigation.

[1]  P. Chindaprasirt,et al.  Shrinkage behavior of structural foam lightweight concrete containing glycol compounds and fly ash , 2011 .

[2]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Designing Against Size Effect on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams Without Stirrups: I. Formulation , 2005 .

[3]  Howard P. J. Taylor,et al.  Shear Strength of Large Beams , 1972 .

[4]  Min-hong Zhang,et al.  Mechanical properties and durability of concrete made with high-volume fly ash blended cements using a coarse fly ash , 2001 .

[5]  Arthur H. Nilson,et al.  Design of concrete structures , 1972 .

[6]  M K Gopalan,et al.  NUCLEAR AND POZZOLANIC FACTORS IN STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS F FLY ASH CONCRETE , 1993 .

[7]  T. Naik,et al.  Long-term performance of high-volume fly ash concrete-pavements , 2003 .

[8]  S. K. Sekar,et al.  Shear resistance of high volume fly ash reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement , 2011 .

[9]  S. Kosmatka,et al.  Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures , 2002 .

[10]  V M Malhotra,et al.  High-volume fly ash system : The concrete solution for sustainable development , 2000 .

[11]  R. Sepanski,et al.  TRENDS '90: A compendium of data on global change , 1991 .

[12]  V. M. Malhotra,et al.  Superplasticized Fly Ash Concrete for Structural Applications , 1986 .

[13]  H. Taylor,et al.  The Fundamental Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Bending and Shear , 1974 .

[14]  Kang Su Kim,et al.  Shear Database for Reinforced Concrete Members without Shear Reinforcement , 2003 .

[15]  C. Atiş High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete with High Strength and Low Drying Shrinkage , 2003 .

[16]  Wichian Chalee,et al.  Utilization of fly ash concrete in marine environment for long term design life analysis , 2010 .

[17]  A. Neville Properties of Concrete , 1968 .

[18]  Stephan A. Durham,et al.  Optimization of Cementitious Material Content for Sustainable Concrete Mixtures , 2012 .