Investigating a Novel Activation-Repolarisation Time Metric to Predict Localised Vulnerability to Reentry Using Computational Modelling

Exit sites associated with scar-related reentrant arrhythmias represent important targets for catheter ablation therapy. However, their accurate location in a safe and robust manner remains a significant clinical challenge. We recently proposed a novel quantitative metric (termed the Reentry Vulnerability Index, RVI) to determine the difference between activation and repolarisation intervals measured from pairs of spatial locations during premature stimulation to accurately locate the critical site of reentry formation. In the clinic, the method showed potential to identify regions of low RVI corresponding to areas vulnerable to reentry, subsequently identified as ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuit exit sites. Here, we perform an in silico investigation of the RVI metric in order to aid the acquisition and interpretation of RVI maps and optimise its future usage within the clinic. Within idealised 2D sheet models we show that the RVI produces lower values under correspondingly more arrhythmogenic conditions, with even low resolution (8 mm electrode separation) recordings still able to locate vulnerable regions. When applied to models of infarct scars, the surface RVI maps successfully identified exit sites of the reentrant circuit, even in scenarios where the scar was wholly intramural. Within highly complex infarct scar anatomies with multiple reentrant pathways, the identified exit sites were dependent upon the specific pacing location used to compute the endocardial RVI maps. However, simulated ablation of these sites successfully prevented the reentry re-initiation. We conclude that endocardial surface RVI maps are able to successfully locate regions vulnerable to reentry corresponding to critical exit sites during sustained scar-related VT. The method is robust against highly complex and intramural scar anatomies and low resolution clinical data acquisition. Optimal location of all relevant sites requires RVI maps to be computed from multiple pacing locations.

[1]  L. Clerc Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Hiroshi Ashikaga,et al.  Feasibility of image-based simulation to estimate ablation target in human ventricular arrhythmia. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[3]  M Manoach,et al.  Ventricular self-defibrillation in mammals: age and drug dependence. , 1980, Age and ageing.

[4]  B. West The Wisdom of the Body; A Contemporary View , 2010, Front. Physiology.

[5]  Kevin Burrage,et al.  A computational investigation into the effect of infarction on clinical human electrophysiology biomarkers , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[6]  W G Stevenson,et al.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Three‐dimensional mechanisms of increased vulnerability to electric shocks in myocardial infarction: Altered virtual electrode polarizations and conduction delay in the peri‐infarct zone , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Warren M. Jackman,et al.  Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Guided by Electroanatomic Mapping for Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction: The Multicenter Thermocool Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[9]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Ventricular scars and ventricular tachycardia. , 2009, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association.

[10]  Fred H M Wittkampf,et al.  RF Catheter Ablation: Lessons on Lesions , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  Bruce H Smaill,et al.  High-Resolution 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Infarct Border Zone: Impact of Structural Remodeling on Electrical Activation , 2012, Circulation research.

[12]  J. Restrepo,et al.  A rabbit ventricular action potential model replicating cardiac dynamics at rapid heart rates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Felipe Aguel,et al.  Computer simulations of cardiac defibrillation: a look inside the heart , 2002 .

[14]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[15]  Lars Eckardt,et al.  Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia , 2009, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[16]  G Plank,et al.  Computational tools for modeling electrical activity in cardiac tissue. , 2003, Journal of electrocardiology.

[17]  I. Efimov,et al.  The role of dynamic instability and wavelength in arrhythmia maintenance as revealed by panoramic imaging with blebbistatin vs. 2,3-butanedione monoxime. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[18]  Makarand Deo,et al.  Arrhythmogenesis by single ectopic beats originating in the Purkinje system. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[19]  Ruben Coronel,et al.  Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na+ Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization , 2010, Front. Physio..

[20]  G. Plank,et al.  The functional role of electrophysiological heterogeneity in the rabbit ventricle during rapid pacing and arrhythmias , 2013, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[21]  S M Dillon,et al.  Anisotropic Reentry in the Epicardial Border Zone of Myocardial Infarcts a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Li Li,et al.  Shock-induced arrhythmogenesis is enhanced by 2,3-butanedione monoxime compared with cytochalasin D. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[23]  J M de Bakker,et al.  Reentry as a cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: electrophysiologic and anatomic correlation. , 1988, Circulation.

[24]  B. Roth Electrical conductivity values used with the bidomain model of cardiac tissue , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  G. Plank,et al.  The role of fine-scale anatomical structure in the dynamics of reentry in computational models of the rabbit ventricles , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Ruben Coronel,et al.  Activation Delay After Premature Stimulation in Chronically Diseased Human Myocardium Relates to the Architecture of Interstitial Fibrosis , 2001, Circulation.

[27]  Alan Garfinkel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Chaos in a Simulated Ring of Cardiac Cells , 1997 .

[28]  Kyoko Soejima,et al.  Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia , 2007 .

[29]  J. D. de Bakker,et al.  Fibrosis and Cardiac Arrhythmias , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[30]  M P Nash,et al.  Organization of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart: experiments and models , 2009, Experimental physiology.

[31]  Alexander V Panfilov,et al.  Is heart size a factor in ventricular fibrillation? Or how close are rabbit and human hearts? , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[32]  Reza Razavi,et al.  An activation-repolarization time metric to predict localized regions of high susceptibility to reentry. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[33]  Igor R Efimov,et al.  Multiple monophasic shocks improve electrotherapy of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model of chronic infarction. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[34]  Candido Cabo,et al.  Remodeling in Cells From Different Regions of the Reentrant Circuit During Ventricular Tachycardia , 2005, Circulation.

[35]  Ruben Coronel,et al.  Dispersion of repolarization and arrhythmogenesis. , 2009, Heart rhythm.