The government's role in promoting corporate responsibility: a comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the changing role of governments promoting corporate responsibility (CR) as a result of the challenges raised by globalisation. CR is linked to the restructuring of governments' agendas in the framework of government/private sector/civil society relationships. It is a result of the research project that applies the Relational State Model Approach to the analysis of CR public policies. The relational state situates the relations between the public and private sectors, between the state and society, in the sphere of co-responsibility. The paper concludes that in the UK a more systemic, national government-centred and business-oriented approach prevails, while Italy has a more extensive, multi-stakeholder and multi-level approach. Future research should complete the comparative analysis expanding it to other European countries: northern and central European countries to analyse the difference between all European governments in order to promote CR. The analytical framework of this paper could be used for academic, business leaders and policy makers to develop future actions in relation to CR public development. The objective to be achieved is to understand the new political and public framework incorporating CR as a new form of governance. We compare two countries that represent two very different models of government action. The theoretical approach of the paper is based on the comparative analysis of CR governmental vision, objectives, strategies and internal government CR structure.

[1]  A. Midttun.  Realigning business, government and civil society , 2005 .

[2]  Stefano Pogutz,et al.  New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior , 2004 .

[3]  Halina Ward,et al.  Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study , 2002 .

[4]  J. Moon.  The Social Responsibility of Business and New Governance 1 , 2002, Government and Opposition.

[5]  Simon Zadek,et al.  The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .

[6]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  The Ethical Wealth of Nations , 2001 .

[7]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[8]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[9]  J. Moon,et al.  Local Partnership and the Unemployment Crisis in Britain , 1989 .

[10]  J. Lozano,et al.  The Role of Governments in Fostering CSR , 2006 .

[11]  A. Sapir.  Globalisation and the reform of European social models: Background document for the presentation at ECOFIN Informal Meeting in Manchester, 9 September 2005 , 2005 .

[12]  R. Schmidpeter,et al.  Corporate social responsibility across Europe , 2005 .

[13]  J. Lozano,et al.  Los gobiernos y la responsabilidad social de las empresas: políticas públicas más allá de la regulación y la voluntariedad , 2005 .

[14]  F. Perrini,et al.  LA CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NEI PAESI DELL’UNIONE EUROPEA: SOSTENIBILITA’ DEI MODELLI DI SVILUPPO , 2004 .

[15]  Dirk Matten,et al.  Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization , 2004 .